On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 08:31:18AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Rushing around is rarely a good idea and doing a release will only
> detract from the resources we need to be investigating and fixing the
> early problems coming in. I would prefer to see us do a normal 1.8.1
> release roughly 10-14
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > Given the number of reports on users@, I think we have to get a 1.8.1
> > with /only/ the 'svnadmin upgrade' crash fix out ASAP.
>
-1. AFAIK, no data is being compromised and there i
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Given the number of reports on users@, I think we have to get a 1.8.1
> with /only/ the 'svnadmin upgrade' crash fix out ASAP.
I am -0 on this plan.
This is an embarrassing problem and we have gotten several quick
reports, but it also is not
Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:06:45 +0200:
> On 19.06.2013 11:00, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > Given the number of reports on users@, I think we have to get a 1.8.1
> > with /only/ the 'svnadmin upgrade' crash fix out ASAP.
>
> (a.k.a I can try to botch the RM if there's agreement on th
Bert Huijben wrote on Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:25:29 +0200:
> This would be much easier to reproduce if we could 'svnadmin upgrade' to
> specific newer formats instead of only directly to the latest version.
>
Yes.
> I have no idea how hard it would be to implement this (and it certainly
> can't
ore testing for
future versions.
Bert
From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com]
Sent: dinsdag 18 juni 2013 23:53
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: Ivan Zhakov; Miliotis Nikolaos; Subversion Development
Subject: Re: Divide by zero at
subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c:upgrad
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Given the number of reports on users@, I think we have to get a 1.8.1
> with /only/ the 'svnadmin upgrade' crash fix out ASAP.
>
> -- Brane
>
+1, but before releasing 1.8.1 we need to make sure that fix is
correct and we doesn't have similar i
On 19.06.2013 11:00, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Given the number of reports on users@, I think we have to get a 1.8.1
> with /only/ the 'svnadmin upgrade' crash fix out ASAP.
(a.k.a I can try to botch the RM if there's agreement on this.)
--
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop
Given the number of reports on users@, I think we have to get a 1.8.1
with /only/ the 'svnadmin upgrade' crash fix out ASAP.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. br...@wandisco.com
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Shouldn’t be to hard by just passing the options to create an 1.1
> compatible FSFS respository?
>
No. You need to upgrade from 1.1 to 1.4 .. 1.7 and *then* 1.8.
The problem occurs in repos that support sharding but are
not shared.
-- Stef
Shouldn’t be to hard by just passing the options to create an 1.1 compatible
FSFS respository?
Bert
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Stefan Fuhrmann
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 11:39 PM
To: Ivan Zhakov
Cc: Miliotis Nikolaos; Subversion Development
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:42
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Miliotis Nikolaos
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I have installed Su
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Miliotis Nikolaos
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have installed Subversion 1.8 and tried to upgrade the repository.
>> > During the upgrade i
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Miliotis Nikolaos
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have installed Subversion 1.8 and tried to upgrade the repository.
> During the upgrade it
> > produced the attached files.
> >
> > The command I used was:
> >
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:07:28PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> % svnadmin1.8 create --compatible-version=1.0 r
Actually, change "1.0" to "1.1" or "1.2"; FSFS didn't exist in 1.0, so this
should have (and now does) error.
Daniel
Ivan Zhakov wrote on Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 21:10:49 +0400:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:53:41PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Miliotis Nikolaos
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I have installed S
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:53:41PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Miliotis Nikolaos
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have installed Subversion 1.8 and tried to upgrade the repository.
>> > During the upgrad
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:53:41PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Miliotis Nikolaos
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have installed Subversion 1.8 and tried to upgrade the repository. During
> > the upgrade it
> > produced the attached files.
> >
> > The command I used
18 matches
Mail list logo
