On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
[...]
>> Questions remain about passing externals explicitly:
>>
>> - when an external is passed as explicit target, still require --include-
>> externals?
>
> IMHO: Do not require --include-externals. If I only want to commit a single
> fi
On 08/29/2011 06:15 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> - when a *pegged* external is passed as explicit target (and say even if
> --include-externals is passed), should we *still* refuse to commit it?
>
> I'd say [...] yes (thinking of avoiding
> inconsistent external state as seen with file externals,
On 08/29/2011 08:46 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>sne-wc-top (an empty wc)
> unversioned
> sne-wc-nested (a different empty wc from svn-wc-top)
> unversioned
>sne-wc-ext (a third, different empty wc, which is an
> externa
> -Original Message-
> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net]
> Sent: maandag 29 augustus 2011 21:55
> To: Neels J Hofmeyr
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Recurse into same-repos externals at commit time.
>
> On 08/29/2011 02:47 P
> -Original Message-
> From: Neels J Hofmeyr [mailto:ne...@elego.de]
> Sent: maandag 29 augustus 2011 20:47
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Recurse into same-repos externals at commit time.
>
> On 08/29/2011 06:23 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
On 08/29/2011 02:47 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 06:23 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 08/29/2011 12:15 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>>> - when an external is passed as explicit target, still require
>>> --include-externals?
>>
>> No. Because we've recommended in the issue I referen
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 14:46:40 -0400:
> On 08/29/2011 02:23 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:23:34 -0400:
> >> On 08/29/2011 12:15 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> >>> If user wants to commit to a *pegged* external, user should ju
On 08/29/2011 06:23 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 12:15 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>> - when an external is passed as explicit target, still require
>> --include-externals?
>
> No. Because we've recommended in the issue I referenced exactly this
> behavior as a workaround for this
On 08/29/2011 02:23 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:23:34 -0400:
>> On 08/29/2011 12:15 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>>> If user wants to commit to a *pegged* external, user should just use a
>>> different, non-externals-ized checkout.
>>
>> AFAIK, we don
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:23:34 -0400:
> On 08/29/2011 12:15 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> > If user wants to commit to a *pegged* external, user should just use a
> > different, non-externals-ized checkout.
>
> AFAIK, we don't have the means to detect and prevent this acti
On 08/29/2011 12:15 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 05:48 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> No sweat. 'svn commit --include-externals' sounds like a fine plan.
>
> +1 and volunteering.
>
> So by default, *all* externals shall be skipped from commit (dir and file
> externals alike).
>
>
On 08/29/2011 05:48 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> No sweat. 'svn commit --include-externals' sounds like a fine plan.
+1 and volunteering.
So by default, *all* externals shall be skipped from commit (dir and file
externals alike).
When --include-externals is passed to 'svn commit', *all* exter
On 08/29/2011 11:45 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net]
>> Sent: maandag 29 augustus 2011 17:40
>> To: Neels J Hofmeyr
>> Cc: Subversion Development
>> Subject: Recurse into same-repos externals at commit time. (was: [P
> -Original Message-
> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net]
> Sent: maandag 29 augustus 2011 17:40
> To: Neels J Hofmeyr
> Cc: Subversion Development
> Subject: Recurse into same-repos externals at commit time. (was: [PATCH]
> don't recursively-commit pegged file externals
14 matches
Mail list logo
