Updated in r1397331.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> They are indeed. It's always bothered me that we didn't use a stable
> type for our revnums:
>
> $ grep svn_revnum_t subversion/include/svn_types.h | grep typedef
> typedef long int svn_revnum_t;
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at
They are indeed. It's always bothered me that we didn't use a stable
type for our revnums:
$ grep svn_revnum_t subversion/include/svn_types.h | grep typedef
typedef long int svn_revnum_t;
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Eh? I thought revnums were longs. Not 64-bit (except b
Eh? I thought revnums were longs. Not 64-bit (except by happenstance)
On Oct 10, 2012 3:06 PM, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Wed Oct 10 22:05:34 2012
> New Revision: 1396826
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1396826&view=rev
> Log:
> Avoid integer size mismatch warning.
>
> * subversio
3 matches
Mail list logo
