Subversion should merge with Mercurial (reverse takeover)

2014-02-03 Thread Paul Hammant
I've been nudged by nice people to post this here - honest !! http://paulhammant.com/2014/02/03/facebook-scaling-mercurial-for-trunk-based-development - (scroll down half way). I'm a user of Subversion from about 0.7 onwards (via Codehaus). I was at the 1.0 party in Brisbane, CA many tears ago.

RE: Subversion should merge with Mercurial (reverse takeover)

2014-02-03 Thread Winston Smith
> I was at the [SVN] 1.0 party [...] many tears ago. SVN isn't that bad, is it :-)))

Re: Subversion should merge with Mercurial (reverse takeover)

2014-02-03 Thread Karl Fogel
Paul Hammant wrote: > http://paulhammant.com/2014/02/03/facebook-scaling-mercurial-for-trunk-based-development > - > (scroll down half way). > > I'm a user of Subversion from about 0.7 onwards (via Codehaus). I was at > the 1.0 party in Brisbane, CA many tears ago. Like Perforce, Svn is still > ou

Re: Subversion should merge with Mercurial (reverse takeover)

2014-02-03 Thread Ben Reser
On 2/3/14, 6:22 PM, Paul Hammant wrote: > I've been nudged by nice people to post this here - honest !! > > > http://paulhammant.com/2014/02/03/facebook-scaling-mercurial-for-trunk-based-development > - > (scroll down half way). > > > I'm a user of Subversion from about 0.7 onwards (vi