On 2/11/14, 6:23 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> I'm going to leave a trunk and 1.8.x with r1496127,r1567492,r1567494 running
> the test repeatedly over night to see if I can duplicate the occasional test
> failure (I see this sometimes on the machine I'm doing this on) like so:
> exit=0; while [ $exit -eq
On 7/9/13, 6:52 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Philip Martin wrote on Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:12:35 +0100:
>> Does that work in 2.5?
>>
>
> It works in 2.4:
>
> >>> r1_time = datetime.datetime(2007, 1, 10, 1, 25, 1, 123456)
> >>> peg_time = r1_time + datetime.timedelta(microseconds=1)
> >
Philip Martin wrote on Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:12:35 +0100:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > Philip - would the following work on your machine? I'd be +1 on the
> > r1496127 nomination in STATUS if the following patch were (commited to
> > trunk and) added to it.
> >
> > In case it matters, the Pyt
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Philip - would the following work on your machine? I'd be +1 on the
> r1496127 nomination in STATUS if the following patch were (commited to
> trunk and) added to it.
>
> In case it matters, the Python version I tested it with is 2.6.
2.5 is the problem and I don't have
Philip - would the following work on your machine? I'd be +1 on the
r1496127 nomination in STATUS if the following patch were (commited to
trunk and) added to it.
In case it matters, the Python version I tested it with is 2.6.
Daniel
[[[
Follow-p to r1496127: Have the test try a date which is n
5 matches
Mail list logo
