[ old thread, but I'd like to add this warning to the archives: ]
> > > > If you ensure that no commits happen during the backup period you
> > > > could use rsync instead.
> > >
> > > It is not safe to rsync live Subversion filesystems. (the result may or
> > > may not be corrupt)
> >
> > That's
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 12:17:07 +0200
> From: s...@elego.de
> To: d...@daniel.shahaf.name
> CC: smith_winston_6...@hotmail.com; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: large number of large binary files in subversion
>
> On Wed,
On 05/25/2011 10:42 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> To resolve this and similar problems we defined that we are not allowed
> to remove pristines with refcount zero until there are no more workqueue
> items, and nobody else has a working copy lock.
>
> (During update the only reference to a pristine is
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu] On Behalf Of Branko Cibej
> Sent: dinsdag 24 mei 2011 18:22
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Server-transmitted "final SHA1 checksums" (Was: "large
> number of large bin
Hi,
> Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> > > using
> > > 'svnadmin hotcopy' to copy your repositories to it once a week or
so
> >
> > Yes, I planned to do that for a read-only backup repository as part
of
> > various backup schedules (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly).
>
> Unfortunately
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:02:28PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:45:21 +0200:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:03:16AM +1100, Winston Smith wrote:
> > > Yes, I planned to do that for a read-only backup repository as part of
> > > various backup schedul
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:45:21 +0200:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:03:16AM +1100, Winston Smith wrote:
> > Yes, I planned to do that for a read-only backup repository as part of
> > various backup schedules (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly).
>
> Unfortunately there is no inc
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:03:16AM +1100, Winston Smith wrote:
>
> > > repo(s) is/are on a permanently mounted USB disk.
> >
> > The USB stick might give you less i/o throughput than an internal hard
> > disk, and it might fail early due to flash wearing out.
>
> I believe I mentioned a disk, not
On May 24, 2011 11:47 AM, "Stefan Sperling" wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:30:39AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > I held off on committing my RA work because there were no consumers.
But
> > I've still considering making the change because a) there's no penalty
for
> > doing so, and b
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 18:21 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 24.05.2011 17:53, Arwin Arni wrote:
> >> I was hoping to slip in
> >> support for avoiding those text transfers altogether where possible.
> >> But I
> >> ran into the obvious problems with the editor interface. (Also, I
> >> became
> >>
> > repo(s) is/are on a permanently mounted USB disk.
>
> The USB stick might give you less i/o throughput than an internal hard
> disk, and it might fail early due to flash wearing out.
I believe I mentioned a disk, not a stick. But thanks anyway...
> using
> 'svnadmin hotcopy' to copy your rep
On 05/24/2011 11:47 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:30:39AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> I held off on committing my RA work because there were no consumers. But
>> I've still considering making the change because a) there's no penalty for
>> doing so, and b) maybe if
On 24.05.2011 17:53, Arwin Arni wrote:
>> I was hoping to slip in
>> support for avoiding those text transfers altogether where possible.
>> But I
>> ran into the obvious problems with the editor interface. (Also, I
>> became
>> concerned about the possibility of a race condition in the pristines
On Tuesday 24 May 2011 09:00 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 05/24/2011 04:23 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:04:26PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
Why can't we send the recorded checksum from the server instead of
sending the whole file and then calculating it on the client si
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:30:39AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I held off on committing my RA work because there were no consumers. But
> I've still considering making the change because a) there's no penalty for
> doing so, and b) maybe if we add the requisite client-side magic in 1.8, 1.7
On 05/24/2011 04:23 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:04:26PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
>> Why can't we send the recorded checksum from the server instead of
>> sending the whole file and then calculating it on the client side?
>>
>> If the checksum matches one of the pristine
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:02:07PM +1100, Winston Smith wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Thanks for your replies. So, in principle, I should not expect any problems.
> The machine would be a decent one-core Athlon3500+ with 2GB RAM,
> doing nothing else other than serving bugzilla, reviewboard and mediawik
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:04:26PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
> Why can't we send the recorded checksum from the server instead of
> sending the whole file and then calculating it on the client side?
>
> If the checksum matches one of the pristine files, then use that to
> populate the nodes table.
corruption.
But this does not seem to be of any concern.
Thanks again.
- Winston
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 12:04:26 +0530
> From: ar...@collab.net
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: large number of large binary files in subversion
>
On Tuesday 24 May 2011 12:58 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:07:50PM +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
In svn 1.7 there is pristine storage area in the working copy, where
all present files are stored by their checksums. If I understand this
pristine storage correctly, if yo
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
> wrote:
> > 2011/5/23 Mark Phippard :
> >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> >>> Bob Archer wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:54:59 -0400:
> I can't imagine that this would need to move the file over the
> network
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:07:50PM +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> In svn 1.7 there is pristine storage area in the working copy, where
> all present files are stored by their checksums. If I understand this
> pristine storage correctly, if you move a file remotely on the server
> (svn mv URL UR
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2011/5/23 Mark Phippard :
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>>> Bob Archer wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:54:59 -0400:
I can't imagine that this would need to move the file over the network
since i
2011/5/23 Mark Phippard :
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> Bob Archer wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:54:59 -0400:
>>> I can't imagine that this would need to move the file over the network
>>> since it all happens server side. Although, I guess when you do an
>>> upd
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Bob Archer wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:54:59 -0400:
>> I can't imagine that this would need to move the file over the network
>> since it all happens server side. Although, I guess when you do an
>> update it might bring the file down ag
Bob Archer wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:54:59 -0400:
> I can't imagine that this would need to move the file over the network
> since it all happens server side. Although, I guess when you do an
> update it might bring the file down again rather than doing a local
> move/rename.
update used t
> I keep my personal photos and videos in Subversion.
> Total repository size is currently 475 GB. There are
> some large (1-4 GB) video files. Everything seems to
> work fine.
>
> Some details: I'm still running Subversion 1.4.6 on the
> server (FSFS, CentOS 5, x86_64). Running 1.6.16
> cmdlin
I keep my personal photos and videos in Subversion.
Total repository size is currently 475 GB. There are
some large (1-4 GB) video files. Everything seems to
work fine.
Some details: I'm still running Subversion 1.4.6 on the
server (FSFS, CentOS 5, x86_64). Running 1.6.16
cmdline client on Cent
On Fri, 2011-05-20, Winston Smith wrote:
> Sorry if this is the wrong list, but I'm curious about one thing:
> Are the SVN developers aware of any quirks in SVN in regards
> to storing a large number (say, 1000) very large binary files
> (say, 1GB each)? So, the entire repository would be 1TB of si
Hi all,
Sorry if this is the wrong list, but I'm curious about one thing:
Are the SVN developers aware of any quirks in SVN in regards
to storing a large number (say, 1000) very large binary files
(say, 1GB each)? So, the entire repository would be 1TB of size,
but my concern is not space, but ra
30 matches
Mail list logo
