Greg Stein wrote:
> Woah. This is even crazier than what you fixed. *nobody* asks
> for the end revision. In fact, the code would have crashed since
> END_REVISION was always NULL.
No, it wasn't that broken, it was only a bit of an ugly API. Both the END_URL
and END_REVISION output pointers were
Woah. This is even crazier than what you fixed. *nobody* asks for the end
revision. In fact, the code would have crashed since END_REVISION was
always NULL. Thus, ->kind must have never been unspecified. But no matter,
as the param is useless. Also note that only one callsite asks for the
start, an
2 matches
Mail list logo
