Re: svn commit: r1501038 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

2013-07-09 Thread Ben Reser
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: If you're going to vote this way, then I think you need to say what would solve the issue for you. We probably don't want to play bring me another rock. I'm pretty sure that Daniel would accept my suggestion in the other thread

Re: svn commit: r1501038 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

2013-07-09 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: [..] Have we considered just turning off chunked requests entirely until Serf has a fix to automatically detect and handle servers that don't support chunked requests? Note, again: Serf will not have a feature to automatically

Re: svn commit: r1501038 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

2013-07-09 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Hi Philip, On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Lieven Govaerts l...@apache.org writes: Note, again: Serf will not have a feature to automatically detect that servers don't support chunked requests. Such a check is implemented in ra_serf with the

Re: svn commit: r1501038 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

2013-07-09 Thread Philip Martin
Lieven Govaerts l...@apache.org writes: First of all, because that's not guaranteed to be or stay that way. Take for instance svnsync. It currently sends two non-pipelined OPTIONS requests (to my surprise) from: 1. svn_ra_serf__exchange_capabilities 2. svn_ra_serf__v2_get_youngest_revnum I

Re: svn commit: r1501038 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

2013-07-09 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: Have we considered just turning off chunked requests entirely until Serf has a fix to automatically detect and handle servers that don't support chunked requests? I've seen a lot of discussion about the cost of doing an extra

Re: svn commit: r1501038 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

2013-07-09 Thread Greg Stein
On Jul 9, 2013 12:52 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: Have we considered just turning off chunked requests entirely until Serf has a fix to automatically detect and handle servers that don't support chunked requests? I've

Re: svn commit: r1501038 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

2013-07-08 Thread Greg Stein
If you're going to vote this way, then I think you need to say what would solve the issue for you. We probably don't want to play bring me another rock. Note: I see the term busted is from svn's point of view, NOT the protocol definition, and since this is *our* config, then it is entirely

Re: svn commit: r1501038 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

2013-07-08 Thread Daniel Shahaf
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:52:34AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote: If you're going to vote this way, then I think you need to say what would solve the issue for you. http-probe-chunking We probably don't want to play bring me another rock. Note: I see the term busted is from svn's point of view,