Re: svn commit: r1649012 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/

2015-01-12 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 5 January 2015 at 15:43, Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015 New Revision: 1649012 URL:

Re: svn commit: r1649012 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/

2015-01-05 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015 New Revision: 1649012 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012 Log: Merge branches/fsx-id in /trunk, remove the

Re: svn commit: r1649012 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/

2015-01-02 Thread Philip Martin
Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com writes: On 2 January 2015 at 18:59, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com writes: Do I understand correctly that you have merged branch without resolving concerns about dirent_t structure naming raised dev@ list two

Re: svn commit: r1649012 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/

2015-01-02 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015 New Revision: 1649012 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012 Log: Merge branches/fsx-id in /trunk, remove the BRANCH-README and resolve trivial conflicts. Stefan, Do I understand correctly

Re: svn commit: r1649012 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/

2015-01-02 Thread Philip Martin
Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com writes: Do I understand correctly that you have merged branch without resolving concerns about dirent_t structure naming raised dev@ list two weeks ago [1] ? The names appear to have been changed (dirent_t to svn_fs_x__dirent_t) as part of the merge commit. --

Re: svn commit: r1649012 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/

2015-01-02 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 2 January 2015 at 18:59, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com writes: Do I understand correctly that you have merged branch without resolving concerns about dirent_t structure naming raised dev@ list two weeks ago [1] ? The names appear to have

Re: svn commit: r1649012 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/

2015-01-02 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes: My mistake, I was looking at libsvn_fs_fs/fs.h in my tree and saw the rename, but it occurred later in r1649062. Should be looking at libsvn_fs_x/fs.h -- Philip

Re: svn commit: r1649012 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/

2015-01-02 Thread Branko Čibej
On 02.01.2015 14:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote: On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015 New Revision: 1649012 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012 Log: Merge branches/fsx-id in /trunk, remove the BRANCH-README and resolve trivial

Re: svn commit: r1649012 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/

2015-01-02 Thread Branko Čibej
On 02.01.2015 14:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote: On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015 New Revision: 1649012 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012 Log: Merge branches/fsx-id in /trunk, remove the BRANCH-README and resolve trivial