On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
>> On 19.04.2015 10:57, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>> Why do you set the header if you can just set the parsed depth value even
>> more locally as I did in my patch I sent as reply on the thr
Sure, I can add your +1 ... both backports? 1.8 and 1.9 ?
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation on why you prefer the tweak here. With that
> explanation feel free to add my +1. (Or I will add it myself later tonight).
>
> Bert
>
> Sent from Windows M
Thanks for the explanation on why you prefer the tweak here. With that
explanation feel free to add my +1. (Or I will add it myself later tonight).
Bert
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Greg Stein
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 7:27 PM
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
On Sun
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 19.04.2015 10:57, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
> Why do you set the header if you can just set the parsed depth value
> even more locally as I did in my patch I sent as reply on the thread?
>
>
> The patch Greg and Stefan cooked up kicks in a
I don't have those links in my telephone. As far as I know the link was in the
thread where we discussed this; perhaps in the related issue.
Bert
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Stefan Sperling
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 6:18 PM
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Cc: comm...@subv
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 05:57:54PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Why do you set the header if you can just set the parsed depth value even
> more locally as I did in my patch I sent as reply on the thread?
I could not find your patch in the thread with subject
"branching over mod_dav 2.4.6 is O(tr
svn commit: r1674628 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
Author: stsp
Date: Sun Apr 19 15:03:12 2015
New Revision: 1674628
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1674628
Log:
* STATUS: Nominate r1674627.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
URL:
http://s
7 matches
Mail list logo
