On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09, Julian Foad wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-08-09, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> > Stefan Küng wrote:
>> > > This leads me to another request: would it be possible to 'un-deprecate'
>> > > the svn_wc_get_pristine_copy_path() API?
>>
>> > One
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 09.08.2010 16:44, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Julian Foad
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-08-09, Julian Foad wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Stefan Küng wrote:
>> On 09.08.2010 16:44, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Julian Foad
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On
This fix should probably be made on trunk, yes?
-Hyrum
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:27 PM, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Mon Aug 9 18:27:49 2010
> New Revision: 983764
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983764&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix an obvious typo in the path validation code that is also
Should this fix be made on trunk?
To make sure that bug fixes get the broadest coverage, we fix bugs on
trunk, and then backport them to feature and/or release branches. It
may seem like some additional overhead, since you've (currently) only
got commit priviledges on the performance-improvement
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:45:18PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Also, this isn't really related to performance; it belongs on /trunk. Next
>> time, you could send this with a [PATCH] marker in the subject line, and
>> a full committer co
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:41 AM, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue Aug 10 14:41:31 2010
> New Revision: 984056
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=984056&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
> (includes): Remove a few unused includes.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/t
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 15:31 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Upgrading a WC to single-DB:
>>
>> upgrade_to_wcng() calls
>>
>> svn_wc__db_upgrade_begin() to create a new DB, and then
>> svn_wc__db_wclock_obtain() and then
>> svn_wc__write_upg
The general ambivalence toward buildbot failures on the 1.6.x branch
is due (at least for me) to the fact that some of the build slaves
aren't configured to properly build the branch, so they *always* fail.
However, I can reproduce the authz failure on the 1.6.x branch, which
is a bit disconcertin
When submitting patches, it is helpful to provide a log message. (See
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/general.html#log-messages)
Thanks,
-Hyrum
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> Small update to the patch: change doxygen comment to match new argument name.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> (hitted "send" too soon)
>
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 03:40:51 +0300:
>> For the last few weeks I've been working on the atomic-revprop branch.
>>
>> (Its goal is port the new svn_fs_change_rev_prop2() to libsvn_ra, which
>
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:38 PM, wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Wed Aug 11 01:38:40 2010
> New Revision: 984280
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=984280&view=rev
> Log:
> Reintegrate the issue-2779-dev branch. Permanent redirect responses
> from an HTTP server now cause the client --
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote on Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 20:10:54 -0500:
>> Do you think the work is sufficiently non-disruptive to be moved back to
>> trunk?
>
> Yes.
>
> Updated plan: I'll do the "marshal error
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Bolstridge, Andrew
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:37 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Bikeshed: configuration override order
>>
>> On 11.08.2010 11:05, Bolst
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:07 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 12:04 PM, Loren Cahlander wrote:
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I am trying to make a change to mod_dav_svn on my server and need to get
>> a value out of the HTTP headers. I have not developed in C in quite a
>> while and would app
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> svn_wc_add_repos_file4(..., copyfrom_url, ...) has a check that says,
>
> "If copyfrom_url isn't in the same repository as the WC target parent
> dir, then SVN_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_FEATURE."
>
> Semantically, yes, copying from another repos isn't y
Recently, we've updated the various client APIs which do commits to
return commit info back through a callback[1], since they may be
extended to perform multiple commits (see issue #1199 for instance).
In doing so, I've had the opportunity to take a look at the
svn_commit_info_t struct. It's prett
Should this test be XFail over dav, rather than just skipped? It
seems like a reasonable operation to be doing over dav.
-Hyrum
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:32 AM, wrote:
> Author: sbutler
> Date: Fri Aug 13 10:32:14 2010
> New Revision: 985152
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=985152&vie
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 2:04 PM, wrote:
> Author: sbutler
> Date: Sun Aug 15 19:04:54 2010
> New Revision: 985735
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=985735&view=rev
> Log:
> Eliminate 'AM' in 'svn diff --summarize' output, for items added with
> properties. Print 'A ' instead, which is co
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Shrinivasan T wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get the doc for the function svn_io_copy_perm
>
> I searched in the following URL.
>
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/api/latest/search.php?query=svn_io_copy_perm
>
> It is not searching properly.
>
> Please fix this
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12, Paul Burba wrote:
>> I'm working on that approach, but in the meantime I have a question
>> about the behavior of svn diff --summarize when describing the
>> addition of paths with properties.
>>
>> ### Let's take a vanilla
Thanks. Committed a fix to the tigris repo in r110.
For those wondering, the correct link is:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/release-history.html
-Hyrum
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Vincent Lefevre
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When one searches for Subversion history on Google, one g
This looks like it could be a candidate for 1.6.x.
-Hyrum
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:47 AM, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Aug 15 15:47:38 2010
> New Revision: 985695
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=985695&view=rev
> Log:
> Follow-up to r985601: fix a rare error condition that d
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Recently, we've updated the various client APIs which do commits to
>> return commit info back through a callback[1], since they may be
>> extended to perform multiple co
Howdy all.
All of the wandiscians are having a face-to-face this week, and one of
the ideas floated was a public-facing page on our website listing the
items left to complete before the 1.7 release. In the past, we've had
a STATUS-1.x in trunk, which has been useful for tracking the stages
toward
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 01:42 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
>> Maybe I don't understand that change:
>> --depth specifies a depth to use for the command. If I want the command
>> to use the depth of the working copy, I specify an unknown depth or none
>>
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found that I need the functionality to change a repository's UUID
> over the RA layer in 'svnrdump load' (see my recently committed tests
> to see why). I initially planned to put this off until functionality
> until someon
It's that time again! In looking at the list of current branches
(excepting release and backport branches I've noticed several which
look to be abandoned or unmaintained. Branches which have not been
touched in over a year include (along with author and date of last
revision, stolen from ViewVC):
I raised some issues about this proposed change in
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-08/0431.shtml. Could you please
address them?
Thanks,
-Hyrum
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:25 PM, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue Aug 17 22:25:09 2010
> New Revision: 986510
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:33:13PM -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> It's that time again! In looking at the list of current branches
>> (excepting release and backport branches I've noticed several which
&
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:26 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 09:59 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Howdy all.
>>
>> All of the wandiscians are having a face-to-face this week, and one of
>> the ideas floated was a public-facing page on our website listing th
ur list.
Whoops! I've seen those commits recently, and it certainly isn't an
abandoned branch. Sorry to have kept it on that list (it was an
oversight, I assure you).
> I've discussed the plans on dev@ recently, the only thing blocking it
> from moving forward is that I haven&
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 17.08.2010 23:41, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, C. Michael Pilato
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/17/2010 01:42 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Maybe
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> [[[
> * subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c
> (svn_repos_parse_dumpstream2, svn_repos_parse_dumpstream3): Rename
> the older function and add a version_number argument; error out if
> there's a version mismatch.
>
> * subversion/include/
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:39 AM, wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Fri Aug 20 10:39:27 2010
> New Revision: 987454
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=987454&view=rev
> Log:
> * site/publish/roadmap.html
> (release-status): Instead of having one big WC-NG item and several other
> items that
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Getting back to this...
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 16:10, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
>> Recently, we've updated the various client APIs which do commits to
>> return commit info back through a callback[1], sin
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:35 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> See http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3693
>
> Would it make sense for a multi-target update (such as 'svn update *') to
> print headers for each of its targets?
>
> $ svn up projects/*
> Updating 'projects/ezt'.
> At re
Steve,
This is is about the development of Subversion. Your question about
the usage of Subversion is more appropriately directed toward the
users' list .
Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Steve wrote:
> I am trying to get a list from the repository (not anyone's working
> copy) of the f
Thanks!
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24, [email protected] wrote:
>> Log:
>> Move the commit callback out of the client context and into the individual
>> APIs
>> which require it.
>
> Hurrah!
>
> Reviewed and looks good.
>
> - Julian
>
>
>> * subversion
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:03:04PM -0400, Bob Archer wrote:
>> I'm just talking as a user here... and not an svn dev... but do you
>> really need to spend time on a 1.6 to 1.7 WC upgrade? Why not just
>> have 1.7 not work with 1.7 WCs and
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Julian Foad
> wrote:
>> Bindings: swig-py, swig-pl, swig-rb all pass their tests. ctypes-python
>> fails to build for me. Java: Philip said "I've run javahl tests in
>> single-db, 3 FAILs compared to 1 in
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:04 PM, wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Thu Sep 2 18:04:32 2010
>> New Revision: 992041
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=992041&view=rev
>> Log:
>> JavaHL: Make a couple of URI fields of the public java
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
>
>> After our conversation on IRC, I did write a short test program to
>> better investigate what the Java URI class accepted or balked at. I
>>
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> As described by Julian earlier this month, Julian, Philip and I observed
> that the BASE_NODE, WORKING_NODE and NODE_DATA tables have many fields in
> common. Notably, by introducing the NODE_DATA table, most fields from
> BASE_NODE and WORKI
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 22:51, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
>>...
>> My one concern (and perhaps this comes from not following the
>> discussion closely enough) is how this impacts 1.7. This feels eerily
>> like an e
As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch "done".
It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and devs looking at the
branch and providing feedback.
Through IRC and other conversations, I've gotten the feeling that some
of the changes made on the branch might be a bit too wide-
Try renaming the file as a .txt ?
-Hyrum
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Wei-Yin Chen wrote:
> Sorry, don't know why the attachment was removed again. Does this
> mailing list have a strict "Content-Type" filter? I'm trying
> text/x-patch this time from my linux box. Type
> application/octet-str
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Greg Stein [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: zaterdag 4 september 2010 6:28
>> To: Bert Huijben
>> Cc: Julian Foad; Erik Huelsmann; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] WC-NG: merge NODE
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch "done".
> It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and devs looking at the
> branch and providing feedback.
>
> Through IRC and other conversa
Should you be using SVN_ERR_ASSERT() or one of its variants, here?
-Hyrum
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:30 PM, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Sep 5 22:30:09 2010
> New Revision: 992905
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=992905&view=rev
> Log:
> Format fix:
> Remove spaces between funct
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>> As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch "done".
>>
>
> Correct. I've just been polishing parts of it over the last
> two weeks or so.
>>
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> I would not be so sure. When you are dealing with a GUI, adding a
>> handful of milliseconds to something that is going to be done
>> thousands of times can add up to less responsivenes
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 13:34, wrote:
>> Author: rhuijben
>> Date: Fri Sep 3 17:34:52 2010
>> New Revision: 992390
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=992390&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Add a few helper functions to allow experimenting with SQL
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I don't see a README.branch or whatever it should be named...
Thanks for the reminder, I've added one in r995168.
> What is this branch for, and why is it not on trunk?
The purpose is to expose some of the RA-layer APIs in JavaHL. The
reason
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
>> As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch "done".
>> It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and devs looking at the
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> while trying to get git-svn to work with gnome-keyring, I found that the
> (perl) bindings for the svn_auth_get_platform_specific_client_providers
> function are missing. Or actually, a binding is generated, but it
> ends wit
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>> While writing this, I've finally found the "include/svn_containers.swg"
>> file containing all kinds of typemaps for the apr_*_t types. I'll try
>> poking in there a bit, I'll keep you posted.
>
> Using the following patch (
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hi Hyrym,
>
> thanks for your thoughts.
>
>> Would it be possible to add a test to the Perl bindings tests which
>> exercises this new code?
> Where do these live? I looked around the tests directory a bit, but I
> didn't think there were
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I suspected as much, and simply wanted to confirm/prod.
No problem, thanks for the prod.
> Keeping "new" features from here-on-out on a branch is totally fine
> with me. Alternatively, placing them under an #ifdef like we did with
> the obliter
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:27 PM, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Thu Aug 12 23:27:40 2010
> New Revision: 985037
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=985037&view=rev
> Log:
> The second (and probably last) mass change: svn_stringbuf_appendbytes has
> a relatively large runtime overhead if w
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I've went ahead and added the atomic-revprop branch to the buildbot's
> watched branches. (Apparently I missed some ra_serf breakage on the
> branch, and I can't run the 4-way tests every time.) If anyone has an
> issue with this change, ple
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 06:52:07AM -, [email protected] wrote:
>> ==
>> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_string.h (original)
>> +++ subversion/trunk
I've been thinking about ways that our API documentation could be made
a bit cleaner.
Currently, we use a lot of prose to describe APIs, their parameters,
and other nuances. I find this approach rather unique, and in some
ways obfuscating. We have great documentation in that we cover a lot
of gr
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> I've been thinking about ways that our API documentation could be made
>> a bit cleaner.
>>
>> Currently, we use a lot of prose to describe APIs, their parameters,
>> and other
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: woensdag 15 september 2010 11:18
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: svn commit: r997237 - in
>> /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindin
It's been 3 months since the last 1.6.x release, and we've got a few
items in STATUS or CHANGES which could warrant a release. I'd like to
roll in 1 or 2 weeks, so please go through STATUS and do some review.
If folks have thoughts on the timeliness of this release, or other
changes which ought to
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Daniel Trebbien wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright mail.utexas.edu> writes:
>> Thanks. Though I'll probably wait a day or two, to let any dissenters
>> make themselves known. :)
>
> -1/2. There are parts of your idea that I like, such as linki
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 04:51:15PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> [email protected] wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05:15 -:
>> > Author: stsp
>> > Date: Wed Sep 15 10:05:14 2010
>> > New Revision: 997249
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99
>> > where the benefits are desirable? When Subvers
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 16:39, wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Wed Sep 15 20:39:44 2010
>> New Revision: 997493
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997493&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Create the object-model branch, wherein we will attempt
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:23, wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Thu Sep 16 08:23:54 2010
>> New Revision: 997639
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997639&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Attempt to centralize and improve our API documentation,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 12:02
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: svn commit: r997670 - in /subversion/branches/object-model: ./
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> It's been 3 months since the last 1.6.x release, and we've got a few
> items in STATUS or CHANGES which could warrant a release. I'd like to
> roll in 1 or 2 weeks, so please go through STATUS and do some review.
During the bar camp at the Apache Retreat in Hursley, several[1] devs
got together to tolk about Subversion stuff. Here's a brief summary
of our discussion:
* diff and blame [Johan Corveleyn]
- blame behavior is much worse (still) than CVS
- a brief overview of how 'blame' works
- it would
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: zondag 19 september 2010 21:59
>> To: Subversion Development
>> Subject: Performance branch review: single revision changes
>>
>> Hi there,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 15.09.2010 14:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> Some update on this: I have implemented this for svn_diff (excluding
>>> the identical prefix and suffix of both files, and only the
For the C++ folks out there, I've got a question about an approach to
take on the object-model branch. At issue is how to wrap the various
C structures returned to callers, particularly in a backward
compatible manner. Currently, I'm looking at svn_wc_notify_t *. As I
see it, there are a few opt
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> For the C++ folks out there, I've got a question about an approach to
> take on the object-model branch. At issue is how to wrap the various
> C structures returned to callers, particularly in a backward
> compatible m
[ apologizes for the somewhat stream-of-conscious nature of these mails ]
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
>> For the C++ folks out there, I've got a question about an approach to
>> t
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 13:41, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Greg Stein writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 05:16, wrote:
Author: philip
Date: Thu Sep 23 09:16:28 2010
New Revision: 1000370
URL: http://svn.apache.or
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 22.09.2010 21:41, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> [ apologizes for the somewhat stream-of-conscious nature of these mails ]
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 24.09.2010 04:05, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 22.09.2010 21:41, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>> [ apologizes for the somewhat stream-of-conscious nature
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:27:35 -0400:
>> On 09/24/2010 08:46 AM, Geoff Rowell wrote:
>> > Is it too late to backport it for the upcoming release?
>>
>> It's not about the timing, really. We don't introduce new feat
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 24.09.2010 18:43, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> All of the Pools used to hold the child objects are children of the
>> global parent (created with NULL as the parent pool). As such, they
>> are independent of each
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Steinar Bang wrote:
>>>>>> "Hyrum K. Wright" :
>
>> This could get ugly.
>
>> Creating and destroying pools all over the place could get ugly, but
>> it's necessary evil because all of our object cr
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Dani Church wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> Adding the SVN_MAYBE_POISON(svn_wc_some_function) can be done
>> mechanically (by a script that reads the @deprecated comments and
>> transforms the header files accordingly) --- instead of editing
+1 to merge to trunk.
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:01 AM, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Sep 26 11:01:03 2010
> New Revision: 1001413
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1001413&view=rev
> Log:
> Extensively document the benefits of svn_stringbuf_appendbyte and
> the rationals behind it
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 13:25, Julian Foad wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-09-24, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:16, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> >...
>>> > I think we should produce a test framework that can give us a WC
>>> > containing a
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just had a discussion with WANdisco about the versions that are supported
> for TSVN. Since their customer is using an 1.4.x server I wanted to check
> which version SVN still supports, i.e., provides at least security updates
> for. Bu
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 29.09.2010 20:45, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Stefan Küng
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just had a discussion with WANdisco about the versions that
1.6.13 tarballs are up for testing and signing. The magic revision is r1002816:
http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.6.13/
As usual, signatures from full committers please send back to me.
Testing by enthusiastic users is also welcomed (but remember that this
is not yet a blessed release, with
F51A 2572 0E78 8827 5329 FCFD 6305 9821 F7B2
Hyrum K. Wright [1024D/4E24517C] with fingerprint:
3324 80DA 0F8C A37D AEE6 D084 0B03 AE6E 4E24 517C
Stefan Sperling [1024D/F59D25F0] with fingerprint:
B1CF 1060 A1E9 34D1 9E86 D6D6 E5D3 0273 F59D 25F0
Mark Phippard [1024D/035A96A9] w
5728 351F 33E4 353E 25BC
Bert Huijben [1024D/9821F7B2] with fingerprint:
2017 F51A 2572 0E78 8827 5329 FCFD 6305 9821 F7B2
Hyrum K. Wright [1024D/4E24517C] with fingerprint:
3324 80DA 0F8C A37D AEE6 D084 0B03 AE6E 4E24 517C
Stefan Sperling [1024D/F59D25F0] with fingerprint:
The release is now public, and I've published the CVE advisory (and
linked to it from the release announcement).
Thanks to everybody who tested and signed this release (or just kicked
the tires a bit :) )
A very tired,
-Hyrum
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
>
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-04, Philip Martin wrote:
>> [email protected] writes:
>>
>> > Author: stsp
>> > Date: Sun Oct 3 16:05:19 2010
>> > New Revision: 1003986
>
> Quoting the log message:
>
>> > Starting with version 4, gcc has been printing irritating
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 01.10.2010 15:45, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: vrijdag 1 oktober 2010 1:51
To: Subversion De
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> I'd like to enable NODES as a replacement for BASE_NODE and
> WORKING_NODE. This would involve bumping the format number, and old
> working copies would get automatically upgraded.
>
> This is not the final NODES data model. It currently jus
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Bob Fletcher wrote:
> Philip Martin wandisco.com> writes:
>
>> Ideally these would be commands we could execute using the command
>> line client.
Of even a script with these commands in it (though that isn't always feasible).
>
>
> Thanks, Philip.
>
> I normally
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: vrijdag 8 oktober 2010 13:52
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: svn commit: r1005788 - /subversion/branches/gpg-agent-
>> password-stor
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a follow-up to the WIP-patches I posted last week [1], which
> are about improving performance of svn_diff (and therefor also blame
> on the client-side), especially for large files.
>
> To summarize: the idea was (is) to
1 - 100 of 1458 matches
Mail list logo
