On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Doug Robinson
doug.robin...@wandisco.com wrote:
Daniel:
I think that simply enabling MN (where it is now an error) will create the
situation where the user makes a mistake, gets something they don't expect
and tries to interpret it based on their desire -
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Doug Robinson wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:10:49 -0400:
Daniel:
I think that simply enabling MN (where it is now an error) will create the
situation where the user makes a mistake, gets something they don't expect
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
At the risk of jinxing the proposed June 18th release date for 1.8.0,
I'm posting the proposed tarballs for signing and testing:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
These are cut from the same magic rev as
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:16:06 +0200:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Doug Robinson wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:10:49 -0400:
Daniel:
I think
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:43 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Fri Jun 14 22:43:09 2013
New Revision: 1493272
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1493272
Log:
Revert r1446177, which tweaked the closing time of a blame stream.
This patch caused a huge performance regression
I'd like to implement 'svn-bench null-blame', to measure the
server-side (and network) involved in blame (mainly get_file_revs2).
I started by copying blame-cmd.c to null-blame-cmd.c, but then I
realized that most client-side work during 'blame' is actually done in
the client layer, i.e. blame.c
Relaying the ping to Lieven :-), as he said here that he was working
on a text for the release notes:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-06/0290.shtml
--
Johan
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
Ping!
- Julian
Johan Corveleyn wrote on 2013-06
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
Hi,
Attached a patch to the site branch that tries to explain
SVNAllowBulkUpdates and http-bulk-updates in the 1.8 release notes.
Anyone care to review and fix where needed? I'm not a lot at my pc
tonight and tomorrow
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:09 PM, jcor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jcorvel
Date: Thu Jun 20 01:09:20 2013
New Revision: 1494829
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1494829
Log:
Add information about serf skelta mode and the
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:09 PM, jcor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jcorvel
Date: Thu Jun 20 01:09:20 2013
New Revision: 1494829
URL: http
The checks that protect the user from accidentally merging unrelated
branches (also used for the mergeinfo command IIRC): are these new in
1.8? Are these mentioned somewhere in the release notes? I can't seem
to find anything about this.
--
Johan
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:40 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
On 06/20/2013 06:55 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Fine for me. I actually don't care about this personally (at our
workplace we're still
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
...
The customer would like early access to the features developed as
part of this effort. I think this is a great opportunity to get
real-world testing of new features before we decide whether to ship
them in an official
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Maybe I'm missing something, but why would you downgrade to HTTP/1.0
only because of the 411 (Content Length Required)? Can't you just
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:40 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 11/10/2011 10:29 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
It seems to me that excluding only those externals (dir file) that are
fixed to a specific revision is the best solution. My only worry are all
those users out there
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr ne...@elego.de wrote:
On 11/11/2011 11:41 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
I think there is general agreement (to the degree of common
sense?) that file and dir externals should behave the same
way.
+1 to that.
I would be
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Subversion Wiki for
change notification.
The RepetitiveResolvingOfTheSameRename page has been changed by
PhilipMartin:
Hi all,
I'm wondering if it would be feasible to (make it possible to)
alter/add copyfrom information in an SVN repository. And if so, would
this be a desirable feature?
It would certainly be useful (although I can't fully estimate the
ramifications) for the following use case:
- User commits a
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:23 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wondering if it would be feasible to (make it possible to)
alter/add copyfrom information in an SVN repository
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Talden tal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 01:32:02PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Having a way to do this with svnsync and svndumptool would already be
very useful. It would
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
On Sunday, November 27, 2011 11:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com
wrote:
wild idea
What if we could 'svnadmin (re)load' a single revision $REV in a
repository, which would then automatically fix up
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
Hi Johan. See below...
Hi Julian. Thanks for your insights. You've obviously thought a lot
more about this stuff than I have :-). Some more below ...
On 28 November 2011, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 14:01:45 -0500:
On 12/13/2011 01:25 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net:
Does a file replace differ in any way from a delete plus add of
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 22:04:33 +0100:
[...]
And even:
$ svn mv some/file.txt some/otherfile.txt
$ svn mv some/otherfile.txt some/file.txt
$ svn ci -m Replace some/file.txt with a copy
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012, at 17:58, Paul Burba wrote:
Mike Pilato and I have been kicking around some ideas on server
dictated configuration recently and
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:40:40 +0100:
Another question: is the server-dictated config still extendable by
the client? I.e.: if the server already defines a global svn:ignore
value, can the user still
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
[ ... ]
SERVER DESIGN
Any time the server is about to send a set of revision properties to
the client, the server looks up the extended author fields and adds
corresponding properties to the set of revision
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:04 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Fri Dec 2 18:04:14 2011
New Revision: 1209610
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1209610view=rev
Log:
Fix builds where SVN_DEBUG is not defined.
* subversion/libsvn_subr/debug.c:
Don't build any of this
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 00:03, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 02:58, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike Pilato and I
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:12:15 +0100:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:04 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Fri Dec 2 18:04:14 2011
New Revision: 1209610
URL: http
From: Johan Corveleyn
Sent: 6-1-2012 23:50
To: Daniel Shahaf
Cc: Subversion Development; Hyrum Wright
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1209610
- /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/debug.c
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2012 8:39 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
...
BTW, I noticed that, before r1209610, my release build was failing for
another reason:
..\..\..\subversion\libsvn_subr\debug.c(111): error C4013: 'SVN_DBG
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2012 8:39 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
...
BTW, I noticed that, before r1209610, my release build was failing for
another
Hi,
I'm looking into fixing issue #4023. I'd like to have some feedback on
a possible solution, and some hints on how to best implement it.
The problem
---
- 'svn rm missingItem' (while there is a 'MissingItem' on disk, and
not a 'missingItem') will eventually call
did sway me :-)
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Come to think of it: using properties has the nice advantage that
these configurations come along when a project is branched or
tagged. Which is what most users would expect, I guess.
Except when they don't
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 15 januari 2012 21:26
To: Subversion Development
Subject: How to fix issue #4023 (on Windows, 'svn rm missingItem' deletes
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
[...]
Another thing to note is that there have been some rumblings about
authz improvements, along the lines of an additional permission to
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
We could chose to make things simple and follow the svn:mergeinfo
model
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 15 januari 2012 21:26
To: Subversion Development
Subject
insensitive one.
Heh. But we can still try to emulate it as good as possible :-).
--
Johan
Bert Huijben (Cell phone)
From: Johan Corveleyn
Sent: 22-1-2012 2:48
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: How to fix issue #4023 (on Windows, 'svn rm missingItem'
deletes
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Ok, but in the svn working copy, even on Windows, we can have a valid
fILE.eXT in wc.db, while there is an unrelated file.ext present on the
filesystem. We should be able to do useful things
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com writes:
We haven't chosen to behave like a case-insensitive Windows app, it
seems, and obviously(?) we can't be fully case-sensitive when the
underlying Windows APIs are
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
The only criterion is: is there a case-exact match in wc.db somewhere.
Otherwise, go on and case-normalize to what's on disk.
Even if the exact match is status
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Julian Foad wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Ok, but in the svn working copy, even on Windows, we can have a valid
fILE.eXT in wc.db, while there is an unrelated file.ext present
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Is that sufficient? Given three files foo, FOO and Foo, one in
wc.db, one on disk
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 13:57:28 +:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Philip Martin wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 13:45:49 +:
Johan Corveleyn jcor
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
I'd like to note though that #4023 is also potentially an issue for
svn 1.7 (pre-wcng). At least if you're thinking about
non-commandline usage. As of #3865, one can now also run into this
situation
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
On 24.01.2012 15:15, Philip Martin wrote:
Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de writes:
Given three files foo, FOO and Foo, one in
wc.db, one on disk and one on the command line, is that the same file?
My understanding is that
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: woensdag 25 januari 2012 1:48
To: Julian Foad
Cc: Subversion Development; Bert Huijben; Philip Martin
Subject: Re: How to fix issue #4023
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
[ ... ]
The 'svn rm' case that opened this thread was the first case where libsvn_wc
would be involved and this opens the door to many other changes.
If we change svn rm, then it no longer matches 'svn revert' for these
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 22:05, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
This mail is very non-committal, but from the looks of CHANGES and
Hi,
Is there any existing regexp matching functionality somewhere in de
svn codebase, in a way that is reusable for new functionality? If not,
does anyone know of a reusable third-party library that could be
easily intregrated (I know, it would be Yet Another Dependency, but
I'm just asking for
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 27 januari 2012 16:31
To: Subversion Development
Subject: regexp matching in svn?
Hi,
Is there any existing regexp matching
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012, at 21:30, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 28.01.2012 10:44, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:10:05 +0100:
Yes, it's an option. But it's a hassle. I'm investigating other options.
Installing GNU diff requires deploying
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
Other than that, there is something about GNU diff's -F option that I
don't like: it doesn't trim leading whitespace from the matched
function line, unlike the -p option.
Sorry, I made a mistake here, I
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:42:21AM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
2012/1/30 Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de:
[ ... ]
And mixing various unicode forms works fine today if the filesystem
used by the client supports this. The
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
On 30.01.2012 21:00, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:42:21AM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
2012/1/30 Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 01:12:39AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
By the way, I read Stefan's description of why --reintegrate is
necessary, and after slogging through the unfortunate terminology (2-URL
merge doesn't mean a
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:37:51PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
But you cannot use the last-synced revision as left anchor either:
svn co b
svn
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
Other than that, there is something about GNU diff's -F option that I
don't like: it doesn't trim leading whitespace from the matched
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
Hi Paul. Thanks for indulging my enquiries.
Paul Burba wrote:
Julian Foad wrote:
Overriding is done by setting a new value for the inheritable
property svn:i:ignore, like this:
/subversion
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danielsh
Date: Thu Feb 2 16:13:20 2012
New Revision: 1239695
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1239695view=rev
Log:
Merge the r1207555 group from trunk:
* r1207555, r1207808
mod_dontdothat: contrib/ - tools/ and
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Stephen Butler sbut...@elego.de wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 23:18 , Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danielsh
Date: Thu Feb 2 16:13:20 2012
New Revision: 1239695
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
I'm hesitant to roll a release until the cause of this problem has
been located, and a potential course of action identified.
There is also the recent backport (just
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
I'm hesitant to roll a release until the cause of this problem has
been located, and a potential
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
My scripts build both ways on the buildbots and don't fail, but I don't
see a problem with the fix.
Bert Huijben (Cell phone)
From: Paul Burba
Sent: 3-2-2012 9:01
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: Johan Corveleyn; dev
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
Doh, you obviously meant that I try it with serf, not with ra_local.
Yes, I can reproduce that: it fails in exactly the same way as the
svn-slik-w2k3-x64-ra buildbot
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:44:06 -0600:
The question I have, which is more 1.7.3-centric, is what changed on
the 1.7.x branch to start this happening? Perhaps answering that
will help us know what
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:44:06 -0600:
The question I have, which is more 1.7.3-centric, is what changed on
the 1.7.x branch
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de writes:
Does the test trigger the error message
680 ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, serr-apr_err,
681 resource-info-r,
682
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
I actually don't see anything either in the Apache error log (except
the child process starting up etc). Or should I look somewhere else?
The error log is the right
Having another look at this failure ...
So far, we know (anyone, correct me if I'm wrong):
- 'svnrdump load' in this test fails with: svnrdump: E140001:
Unrecognized record type in stream. It seems the dumpfile contents of
the file D/H/psi is split incorrectly (property content is dumped
early,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Having another look at this failure ...
So far, we know (anyone, correct me if I'm wrong):
- 'svnrdump load' in this test fails with: svnrdump: E140001:
Unrecognized record type in stream. It seems the dumpfile contents
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
DBG: dump_editor.c: 756: close_file 0112B188
DBG: dump_editor.c: 552: add_file trunk/D/H/psi
DBG: dump_editor.c: 725: apply_textdelta 0112B188
DBG: dump_editor.c: 633
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:26 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
Bah. I'd be surprised if most of our editors supported postfix text deltas.
To my knowledge, there is exactly one driver which uses that
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
However, if I let the test suite start up httpd, then I *do*
consistently see the same failure:
Wow, I wouldn't have thought of that as a discriminating factor. I'm
running the server in a separate command window,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012 1:23 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
...
It is suggested there that setting
libsvn_ra_serf/update.c:MAX_NR_OF_CONNS
to 2
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012 3:07 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012 1:23
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not build with BDB. When running the tests, I had one test
failure I have never had before. Anything to be concerned with?
svn_tests: E160033: Failed to load module for FS type 'bdb'
FAIL: client-test.exe 3: test
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
Subversion-1.7.4 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
Please add your signatures to the .asc
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
The primary issue when I looked at this problem was that the streamy
abstraction is broken in several places, such as when we install the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 12, 2012 9:59 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
...
(BTW: the pristine file (on Windows) only has LF line-endings when
svn:eol-style=native (or =LF). When it's svn:eol-style=CRLF, the
pristine file has
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 16, 2012 8:32 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:58:18AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mar 16, 2012 5:30 AM, phi...@apache.org wrote:
...
+++
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 16.03.2012 15:50, Stephen Butler wrote:
Some users do want more control over update (i.e., they trust
Subversion less). Interactive resolution during or after update is an
interesting scenario.
s/Some/Many/ :)
I
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Stephen Butler sbut...@elego.de wrote:
On Mar 17, 2012, at 1:14 , Johan Corveleyn wrote:
[...]
Don't git and mercurial and others just apply the changes to wherever
the code moved to, regardless of the container? Do those users often
complain about
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:52 AM, ne...@apache.org wrote:
/home/neels/svnbench/20120319-002438
Started at Mon Mar 19 00:24:38 UTC 2012
*Disclaimer:* this tests only file://-URL access on a GNU/Linux VM.
This is intended to measure changes in performance of the local working
copy layer,
2012/3/22 Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com:
Sérgio Basto wrote:
Philip Martin wrote:
Or you could rebuild the current APR with a
one-line patch to set ht-seed to 0 in apr_hash.c:apr_hash_make.
I think when subversion receive the result of this apr_function , we
should do the sort ,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Ashod Nakashian
ashodnakash...@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip]
From: Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com
[snip]
In some respects, it looks like you're solving *two* problems:
compression and the internal fragmentation due to large FS block
sizes. How orthogonal are
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@apache.org wrote:
Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
Please add your signatures to the .asc
Hi,
I haven't built trunk for a while, and now that I'm catching up I get
the following build errors (with my release build):
libsvn_client.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
svn_client__do_symmetric_merge
libsvn_client.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
buildbot would have
failed.
I think the problem is that the extractor wasn't used, while public
APIs were added/removed.
Bert Huijben (Cell phone)
From: Daniel Shahaf
Sent: 10-4-2012 5:03
To: Johan Corveleyn
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: build probs on Windows with release build
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
But, but ... I re-run gen-make.py pretty often (especially after I've
not built it for a while), so I certainly did in this case. Or do I
need to manually clean something before rerunning gen-make.py?
Bert, does
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
I don't know what Surf-Shield does. Its description says: Can detect
exploit sites and other complex online threats. There is some more
explanation on the AVG website
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 15:46:38 +0200:
On 11.04.2012 13:52, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 13:43:57 +0200:
If anyone has any suggestions on capturing network
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@apache.org wrote:
I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.6.18.
[...]
For this release, the following people have provided PGP signatures:
C. Michael Pilato [1024D/1706FD6E] with fingerprint:
20BF 14DC F02F 2730
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:38:52PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@apache.org wrote:
I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.6.18
301 - 400 of 1221 matches
Mail list logo
