Re: 1.7.0-rc2 up for signing / testing

2011-08-30 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes: Status against revision:      2 = Expected 'gamma' and actual 'gamma' in status tree are different

Re: Failing test svnsync_tests.py 28: copy and reencode non-UTF-8 svn:* props

2011-09-01 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:29 PM, David Darj z...@alagazam.net wrote: On 2011-08-28 20:34, Johan Corveleyn wrote: Hi, I get a test failure of svnsync_tests.py 28: copy and reencode non-UTF-8 svn:* props. The following error appears: svnsync: E720087: Can't convert string from 'ISO-8859-3

Re: question for FSFS gurus (was: Re: FSFS successor ID design draft)

2011-09-05 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 01:46:09PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote: [...] I'm not FSFS guru, but I still feel that FSFS successor ID doesn't worth to be implemented because there is no strong reasons/usage for it. For me it looks like bottom-up design approach. Also slightly OT (no FSFS-guruness

Re: SVN 1.7 problems with case insensitive file systems (Windows)

2011-09-12 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Marc Strapetz marc.strap...@syntevo.com wrote: There are some problems when capitalization of a file or directory name changes in the working copy (at least on Windows). I'm starting off with following tree: # svn status -v  1        1 Marc         .  1    

Re: SVN 1.7 problems with case insensitive file systems (Windows)

2011-09-12 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Marc Strapetz marc.strap...@syntevo.com writes: Adding the unversioned directory and removing the missing one seems to work: # svn add a/b/E # svn rm a/b/e # svn status !       a\b\E !       a\b\E\alpha !  

Re: SVN 1.7 problems with case insensitive file systems (Windows)

2011-09-12 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes: No, I don't think that's the problem. That should work (can't test right now, being @work, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on Windows). I think the OP means

Re: SVN 1.7 problems with case insensitive file systems (Windows)

2011-09-12 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes: and the commit failed compaining the a/b/E is missing.  Now that commit works, on case-sensitive and case-insensitive filesystems, when the added tree is a mv with

Re: 1.7.0-rc3 up for testing / signing

2011-09-13 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote: In accordance with my aforementioned intent, I've rolled 1.7.0-rc3 from the latest bits on the 1.7.x branch, and posted them here for testing / signing: http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-rc3/ The magic

Re: Does the fix for case-only renames merit a Release Note?

2011-09-15 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 19:51, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote: It seems to me that the fixes Johan made for case-only renames (obviously

Re: Does the fix for case-only renames merit a Release Note?

2011-09-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 22:54:24 +0200: On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Wed

Re: SVN 1.7 problems with case insensitive file systems (Windows)

2011-09-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes: and the commit failed compaining the a/b/E is missing.  Now that commit works, on case

Running tests over svn://, without running svnserve?

2011-09-27 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Hi, I'm confused: with win-tests.py, is it necessary to start svnserve yourself, before running the tests with --url=svn://localhost; or does win-tests.py take care of starting and stopping svnserve itself? I just started running the testsuite with --url=svn://localhost. But first I started

Re: Running tests over svn://, without running svnserve?

2011-09-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm confused: with win-tests.py, is it necessary to start svnserve yourself, before running the tests with --url=svn://localhost; or does win-tests.py take care of starting and stopping svnserve itself? I just

Re: 1.7.0-rc4 up for signing / testing

2011-09-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote: I've rolled 1.7.0-rc4, what is expected to be the last release candidate, the magic rev is r1176462, and you can find it here: http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-rc4/ After testing this on

Re: Merge info display

2011-09-30 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:24:04PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: I've been thinking about a bunch of issues related to merging and how to help users to avoid some of the common pitfalls.  One subset of my thoughts is on how we

Re: svn merge operation extremely slow

2011-09-30 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kyle Leber kyle.le...@gmail.com wrote: I've encountered what I think is a problem with subversion, but I'm not completely sure (and according to the online instructions I should bring it up here prior to filing a bug). Actually, the instructions on

Re: Merge info display

2011-10-05 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote: On 30.09.2011 16:03, Julian Foad wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 17:27 +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 17:20, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, please keep the old output (one rev per line) available

Re: EXTERNALS table -- good or bad?

2011-10-11 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Neels J Hofmeyr [mailto:ne...@elego.de] Sent: zaterdag 8 oktober 2011 7:58 To: Bert Huijben Cc: 'Subversion Development' Subject: Re: EXTERNALS table -- good or bad? On 10/07/2011 02:18

Re: EXTERNALS table -- good or bad?

2011-10-11 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 10:20 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Neels J Hofmeyr [mailto:ne...@elego.de] Sent

Re: EXTERNALS table -- good or bad?

2011-10-12 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr ne...@elego.de wrote: On 10/11/2011 01:29 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: AFAIUI, the EXTERNALS table is indeed not a cache, but it notes the externals as rolled out by the last svn update, i.e. the externals as currently expanded in the WC (at least

Re: Status of the 'showing-merge-info' branch

2011-10-27 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com [...] IDENTIFYING BRANCH ROOTS [[[ $ svn mergeinfo ^/subversion/trunk ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x Branch marker: 'subversion-source-tree' (found on

Re: Status of the 'showing-merge-info' branch

2011-10-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote: Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 22:24:19 +0200: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com

Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying

2013-06-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Tobias Bading tbad...@web.de wrote: Dear Devs, GNU Emacs 24.3 was behaving a little odd today while trying to display a svn diff from Annotate mode. It simply barked svn: Unable to find repository location for '...' in revision ... at me :-(. Since this wasn't

Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying

2013-06-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Tobias Bading tbad...@web.de wrote: Dear Devs, GNU Emacs 24.3 was behaving a little odd today while trying to display a svn diff from Annotate mode. It simply barked svn: Unable to find

Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying

2013-06-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:26:08PM +0200, Ben Reser wrote: Back to your issue. Since Subversion can't represent the copy as part of the diff it tries to do the interoperable thing which is to represent the addition of a

Re: svn commit: r1495419 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf: options.c ra_serf.h serf.c util.c

2013-06-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com writes: I'm really not a fan of this

Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying

2013-06-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: Not by default perhaps, but we could do it by adding the same option to 'svn diff' that you need for 'svnlook diff' for this to work: C:\svnlook help

Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying

2013-06-26 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:20:02PM +0200, Ben Reser wrote: ... Johan pointed out that svnlook diff seems to traverse to the copyfrom source even in case 2). If this is indeed the case, these commands are now behaving in

Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8: strange behavior of 'svn diff -cN WC-FILE' if the file was created in rev N by copying

2013-06-27 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] Sent: woensdag 26 juni 2013 23:53 To: Johan Corveleyn; Ben Reser; Tobias Bading; Peter Samuelson; Subversion Development Subject: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.8

Re: Updatable svn export

2013-07-04 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:30 PM, David Schweikert da...@schweikert.ch wrote: Hi Johan, Thank you for your quick response! On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 15:18:57 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: We have a svn repository with many files (more than 30'000), and need to have the HEAD version exported

Re: SVN 1.8.1

2013-07-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote: Just an fyi. Paul Burba and myself are both travelling this week and we only have our Mac laptops with us. So if you cut a 1.8.1, neither of us can

Re: svn commit: r1500884 - /subversion/branches/invoke-diff-cmd-feature/subversion/svnlook/svnlook.c

2013-07-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:03 PM, g...@apache.org wrote: Author: gbg Date: Mon Jul 8 19:03:37 2013 New Revision: 1500884 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1500884 Log: On the --invoke-diff-cmd branch: Fix help string and comment. * subversion/svnlook/svnlook.c (options_table): Reverse the

Re: svn commit: r1500884 - /subversion/branches/invoke-diff-cmd-feature/subversion/svnlook/svnlook.c

2013-07-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Gabriela Gibson gabriela.gib...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:03 PM, g...@apache.org wrote: Author: gbg I didn't realize you intended to deprecate --diff-cmd in favor

build-svn-deps-win.pl and debug builds

2013-07-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
It would be interesting if build-svn-deps-win.pl could also build debug builds of the dependencies (so I can use them to make a debug build of svn). I suppose this is basically using Debug throughout the file where it currently says Release, and installd instead of installr for httpd etc. [1]

Re: svn commit: r1495419 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf: options.c ra_serf.h serf.c util.c

2013-07-10 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:45:49AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: The option doesn't seem like a big barrier when you're applying it to a handful of machines for

Re: svn commit: r1495419 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf: options.c ra_serf.h serf.c util.c

2013-07-10 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes: Can someone explain again why ra_serf / serf can't just resend requests, with C-L, whenever it has received a 411? So (after we know it's HTTP/1.1) send every request

Re: 1.7.11 up for signing/testing

2013-07-18 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.7.11 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July 23rd so

Re: 1.8.1 up for signing/testing

2013-07-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.8.1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July 23rd so please

Re: Merge bug causes changesets to be applied although this should not be the case

2013-08-06 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote: Hi Christoph. Christoph Schulz wrote: [...] silently ignoring the deletion of a non-existing file part is not a sound decision in my opinion. [...] the problem is that [...] no conflict is _detected_ at all. I

Re: Merge bug causes changesets to be applied although this should not be the case

2013-08-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Fredrik Orderud forde...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: FYI, another user complained about this on the users list (Fredrik Orderud, CC'd) [1]. He has filed issue #4405 [2]. Perhaps some

Re: localisation: status, migration to pootle

2013-08-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote: Mattias Engdegård wrote on Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 19:40:00 +0200: 8 aug 2013 kl. 08.21 skrev Daniel Shahaf: Mattias Engdegård wrote on Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 23:43:36 +0200: Sorry about the late reply; I rarely have time to

Re: localisation: status, migration to pootle

2013-08-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote: Mattias Engdegård wrote on Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 19:40:00 +0200: 8 aug 2013 kl. 08.21 skrev Daniel Shahaf: Mattias Engdegård wrote on Wed, Aug 07

Re: localisation: status, migration to pootle

2013-08-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote: On 09.08.2013 23:54, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote: Mattias Engdegård wrote on Thu

Re: Error compiling with serf 1.3.1 on Windows

2013-08-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
. In general, we should stop building dependencies, except when we embed the sqlite amalgamation. [ btw: serf 1.3.x uses scons to build; serf.mak is gone ] Cheers, -g On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: When I try to build trunk (@now) with serf 1.3.1

Re: Error compiling with serf 1.3.1 on Windows

2013-08-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: When I try to build trunk (@now) with serf 1.3.1 on Win XP (with VS 2010), I

Error during 'svn export' over http with serf 1.3.1

2013-08-23 Thread Johan Corveleyn
I get an error when exporting http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/tags/1.8.3, with trunk@now + serf 1.3.1: [[[ svn export -q http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/tags/1.8.3 ..\..\..\subversion\svn\export-cmd.c:127, ..\..\..\subversion\libsvn_client\export.c:1441,

Re: Error during 'svn export' over http with serf 1.3.1

2013-08-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: I get an error when exporting http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/tags/1.8.3, with trunk@now + serf 1.3.1: [[[ svn export -q http

Re: Error during 'svn export' over http with serf 1.3.1

2013-08-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Saturday, August 24, 2013, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: I get an error when

Re: Error during 'svn export' over http with serf 1.3.1

2013-08-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Saturday, August 24, 2013, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 24

Re: Error during 'svn export' over http with serf 1.3.1

2013-08-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: Thanks! I'll check it later today. Btw did you try fully uninstall antivirus? No, I didn't try that yet. I'm afraid I'll lose the ability to reproduce

Re: Error compiling with serf 1.3.1 on Windows

2013-08-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] Sent: donderdag 22 augustus 2013 23:24 To: Subversion Development Cc: jbl...@gmail.com; Greg Stein Subject: Re: Error compiling with serf 1.3.1

Re: svn commit: r1517192 - /subversion/trunk/build/generator/gen_win_dependencies.py

2013-08-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: jcor...@apache.org [mailto:jcor...@apache.org] Sent: zaterdag 24 augustus 2013 22:02 To: comm...@subversion.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r1517192 -

Re: 1.7.13 up for testing/signing

2013-08-27 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.7.13 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on August 29th so

Re: Improving CHANGES (or at least making it easier to produce)

2013-08-30 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: Right now we produce the CHANGES file by someone going through the log and looking at the individual commits and coming up with the entries for CHANGES. It's an after the fact process. The problem with this is that it's not

Re: Improving CHANGES (or at least making it easier to produce)

2013-08-30 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: At my workplace, we have a convention (enforced by pre-commit hook) to use a prefix between square brackets ([U] for the user-facing text, [S9

Re: Improving CHANGES (or at least making it easier to produce)

2013-08-30 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote: On 30.08.2013 11:48, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: Right now we produce the CHANGES file by someone going through the log and looking at the individual commits

Re: Improving CHANGES (or at least making it easier to produce)

2013-09-01 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On 8/30/13 4:01 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: A log message should describe what changed in the code. Automatically generating release notes and/or CHANGES from log messages is, in my experience, quite impractical. A better approach

Re: Move using initial state

2013-09-06 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes: What about alter_dir? I think the rule is that alter_dir on a directory should occur before add or delete affects the children of the directory. There is also a

Re: Error during 'svn export' over http with serf 1.3.1

2013-09-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Lieven Govaerts lieven.govae...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Lieven Govaerts lieven.govae...@gmail.com wrote: Summarising our investigation: 1. The error that Johan

Re: Error during 'svn export' over http with serf 1.3.1

2013-09-10 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Curt Sellmer sellmer...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Lieven Govaerts [hidden email] wrote: On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Johan Corveleyn [hidden email] wrote: On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Lieven Govaerts [hidden email] wrote

Re: Improving CHANGES (or at least making it easier to produce)

2013-09-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On 9/1/13 2:42 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: That's not really an argument, because that's true whether you do it at commit time or afterwards. You don't save any time (quite the contrary) by postponing it until CHANGES needs

Re: svn log --ignore-properties option

2013-09-27 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On 9/26/13 12:45 PM, Mark Moe wrote: We found that about half the performance issue was solved by using SVNPathAuthz off while the other half was solved by skipping that big revision when doing svn log -v. Just the sheer

Re: Presenting net code changes for a branch

2013-10-13 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Gabriela Gibson gabriela.gib...@gmail.com wrote: On 13/10/13 15:15, Lieven Govaerts wrote: Hi Lieven, The last time you updated the invoke-diff-cmd branch from trunk was in rr1526487, you updated from trunk r1526439. Sorry, I had merged locally but not

Re: Error during 'svn export' over http with serf 1.3.1

2013-10-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] Sent: dinsdag 10 september 2013 09:29 To: Curt Sellmer Cc: Subversion

Re: Branch 'invoke-diff-cmd-feature' is ready for half-way review

2013-10-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Gabriela Gibson gabriela.gib...@gmail.com wrote: ... 2.) The delimiter: There appears to be some team miscommunication here -- afaik, the last status was that danielsh asked me to implement the semi-colon, so this is what you got^Whad :) Now I had a long

syntax for --invoke-diff-cmd (was: Branch 'invoke-diff-cmd-feature' is ready for half-way review)

2013-10-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
[ Changing subject because perhaps some more discussion might arise. More below. ] On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Gabriela Gibson gabriela.gib...@gmail.com wrote: ... 2.) The delimiter: There appears to be some

Re: follow symlinks

2013-11-07 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Dirk noi...@pwnoogle.com wrote: On 11/07/13 01:47, Ben Reser wrote: First of all this really belongs on the users@ list and not dev@. But it's here now so let's look at what your issues are... It would belong to users@ is there was already an

Re: 1.8.5 up for testing/signing

2013-11-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.8.5 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on November 25th so

Re: 1.7.14 up for testing/signing

2013-11-20 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.7.14 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on November 25th so

Re: svn_mime_type_is_binary, libmagic and application/xml

2013-11-20 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:23:39PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote: I suggest that we do two things: 1) update our defaults for some mime types to be text 2) make which mime types are treated as text user configurable with a new

Re: svn_mime_type_is_binary, libmagic and application/xml

2013-11-20 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:19:16AM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: I'm not sure, but isn't libmagic support in svn unix-only? I've never seen it being part of a Windows build. Maybe there's a Windows alternative, but I've

Re: 1.7.14 up for testing/signing

2013-11-20 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote: ... checkout_tests.py 14: 'checkout from the root of a Windows drive' fails for all permutations tested. In his test results Johan mentioned that he saw the same thing and it was due to test suite problem because of

Re: prop edit: lost user edit bug

2014-01-04 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Gabriela Gibson gabriela.gib...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I found the other day that if my network fails for some reason whilst editing a prop, the entire edit is lost. I took a look at the propedit code and found the following: in subversion/svn/propedit-cmd.c

Re: possible optimization on update at externals with fixed-revision number?

2014-01-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote: On 24.01.2014 14:09, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:11:36PM +, Kuno Meyer wrote: Hi all, One of the repositories I am working with has a long list of svn:external links. This has a major impact

Re: [PATCH] pager support for command line client

2014-02-06 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote: ... But this all does make me wonder, what problem are you really trying to solve, and is making 'svn' pipe stdout to a pager the best way of solving it? You mentioned you'd be happy with just 'help' being paged.

Re: 1.8.6 up for testing/signing

2014-02-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.8.6 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on February 12th so

Re: 1.8.8 up for testing/signing

2014-02-17 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.8.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion

Re: 1.8.8 up for testing/signing

2014-02-18 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On 2/17/14, 3:27 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.8.8 release artifacts are now available

Re: 1.8.8 up for testing/signing

2014-02-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote: Ben Reser wrote: On 2/18/14, 12:22 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: Thanks for the hint. Now, this wasn't an error path (just a commit that should have succeeded and should've written something to stdout). I'm

Re: 1.8.8 up for testing/signing

2014-02-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Ben Reser b...@reser.org writes: On 2/18/14, 12:22 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: Thanks for the hint. Now, this wasn't an error path (just a commit that should have succeeded and should've written something

Re: 1.7.16 up for testing/signing

2014-02-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.7.16 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on February 26th so

Re: 1.9.0-alpha1 up for testing/signing

2014-02-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.9.0-alpha1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this and

Re: 1.9.0-alpha1 up for testing/signing

2014-02-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.9.0-alpha1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this and

Re: 1.9.0-alpha1 up for testing/signing

2014-02-23 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] Sent: zaterdag 22 februari 2014 16:52 To: Johan Corveleyn Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development Subject: Re: 1.9.0-alpha1 up for testing

Re: 1.9.0-alpha1 up for testing/signing

2014-02-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.9.0-alpha1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this and

Re: 1.9.0-alpha1 up for testing/signing

2014-02-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] Sent: dinsdag 25 februari 2014 00:41 To: Ben Reser Cc: Subversion Development Subject: Re: 1.9.0-alpha1 up for testing/signing On Thu, Feb 13

Re: 1.9.0-alpha2 up for testing/signing

2014-03-16 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On 3/4/14, 1:23 AM, Ben Reser wrote: The 1.9.0-alpha2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there.

Re: 1.9.0-alpha2 up for testing/signing

2014-03-18 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On 3/4/14, 1:23 AM, Ben Reser wrote: The 1.9.0-alpha2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https

Re: 1.9.0-alpha2 up for testing/signing

2014-03-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On 3/18/14, 9:52 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: I get one failure when testing with FSX: [[[ svn_tests: E160057: Node revision index 26 exceeds container size 26 FAIL: fs-x-pack-test.exe 3: read from a packed FSX filesystem

Re: 1.9.0-alpha2 up for testing/signing

2014-03-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.9.0-alpha2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this

Re: [VOTE] Only require 3 votes for Alpha/Beta releases

2014-04-01 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Op 1-apr.-2014 21:22 schreef Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com: On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: It's proving to be impossible to move forward with the alpha2 release. Let's officially say that alpha and beta releases only require 3 votes (platform doesn't

Re: [VOTE] Only require 3 votes for Alpha/Beta releases

2014-04-03 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On 1 April 2014 23:17, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: It's proving to be impossible to move forward with the alpha2 release. Let's officially say that alpha and beta releases only require 3 votes (platform doesn't matter).

Re: [PATCH] New --file-merge option for issue #4487

2014-04-07 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 18:00:21 +0200: A new --file-merge option is the simplest way of solving this problem I could come up with. It maps the options provided by the internal merge tool to a

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) and at least 3 votes

Re: 1.8.9 up for testing/signing

2014-05-05 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: The 1.8.9 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on May 7th so please

Re: 1.7.17 up for testing/signing

2014-05-06 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On 4/30/14, 2:00 PM, Ben Reser wrote: The 1.7.17 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to

Re: upgrade_tests.py 29 spurious failure while testing 1.7.17

2014-05-13 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On 5/5/14, 4:24 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: As always, I tested with Windows XP (it's end of life, I know ... whatever) on a ramdisk, non-parellel. This time I took a copy of repository and working copy before rerunning the test

Re: svn doesn't cope well with read-only auth cache

2014-05-16 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: If the file with the cached credentials (the file under subversion config dir/auth/svn.simple) is read-only, 'svn' 1.8 (on Windows) will behave as follows after a password change: [[[ C:\svn ls https://svn.example.com

svn doesn't cope well with read-only auth cache

2014-05-16 Thread Johan Corveleyn
If the file with the cached credentials (the file under subversion config dir/auth/svn.simple) is read-only, 'svn' 1.8 (on Windows) will behave as follows after a password change: [[[ C:\svn ls https://svn.example.com/svn Authentication realm: https://svn.example.com:443 SVN Password for

Re: upgrade_tests.py 29 spurious failure while testing 1.7.17

2014-05-16 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: On 5/13/14, 12:43 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: First, thanks a lot for taking a look and giving a plausible explanation. It's a possibility, but I'm not fully convinced yet :-). Pro: - It fits theoretically (the one bit off etc

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >