Re: [dev] dmc news

2009-11-09 Thread pancake
On Nov 10, 2009, at 8:37 AM, Uriel wrote: On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:49 PM, pancake wrote: Hello everyone! I'm writing this lines because the delayed release of dmc that was announced few mails ago. The reason for the lagged release is because of the lack of time to finish the design and i

Re: [dev] dmc news

2009-11-09 Thread pancake
On Nov 10, 2009, at 7:14 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:49 PM, pancake wrote: - mbox: 150 LOC - mdir: 80 LOC Please consider supporting mbox/mdir access over ssh. This was the one redeeming feature of sup[1], but of course they broke it and have inexplicably left it b

Re: [dev] dmc news

2009-11-09 Thread pancake
On Nov 10, 2009, at 6:08 AM, Anders Andersson wrote: Some comments: Networking: - ssl (no certificate check yet) Aren't there ssl-wrappers already? I'm thinking of stunnel, but maybe that doesn't work in this setting. Yep. See the pipeline doc. Originally I was using a pipe to openss

Re: [dev] dmc news

2009-11-09 Thread Uriel
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:49 PM, pancake wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I'm writing this lines because the delayed release of dmc that > was announced few mails ago. > > The reason for the lagged release is because of the lack of time > to finish the design and implementation :( > > We plan to relea

Re: [dev] dmc news

2009-11-09 Thread Enno Boland (Gottox)
2009/11/10, Kurt H Maier : > Please consider supporting mbox/mdir access over ssh. This was the > one redeeming feature of sup[1], but of course they broke it and have > inexplicably left it broken for years in the source. ssh+maildir > obviates imap and pop3. use sshfs > -- > > # Kurt H Maie

Re: [dev] dmc news

2009-11-09 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 11/10/09, Anders Andersson wrote: > Why rewrite it in C? What will you gain with this? There's a lot of > code in the shell interpreter, and everyone will have one (even in an > embedded environment you'll have busybox ash or similar). Use the code > that's already there. :) > usually true but

Re: [dev] [surf] trouble on last tip

2009-11-09 Thread Enno Boland (Gottox)
reverting revision. Was a bad idea anyway... :) 2009/11/9, Tadeusz Sośnierz : > On 9-11-2009 23:12:29, Julien Steinhauser wrote: > > Hello, > > on a fresh last tip surf build, i experience trouble with suckless.org > home page > > when i launch for example : > > surf http://suckless.org > >

Re: [dev] dmc news

2009-11-09 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:49 PM, pancake wrote: >  - mbox: 150 LOC >  - mdir: 80 LOC Please consider supporting mbox/mdir access over ssh. This was the one redeeming feature of sup[1], but of course they broke it and have inexplicably left it broken for years in the source. ssh+maildir obviates

Re: [dev] dmc news

2009-11-09 Thread Anders Andersson
Some comments: > Networking: >  - ssl (no certificate check yet) Aren't there ssl-wrappers already? I'm thinking of stunnel, but maybe that doesn't work in this setting. > Addressbook support: >  - dmc can read/edit a simple addressbook file Is this necessary? read:$ mail `grep "cool dude" ~/.

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscr...@suckless.org

2009-11-09 Thread Kris Maglione
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 07:20:28PM -0600, tosh wrote: For fucks sake it's not that big of a deal is it? I don't read the discussions, hence the unsubscribe. Gmail adds an unsubscribe link, apparently it doesn't work. No need to be a dick. It really is, given the frequency of these things, and t

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscr...@suckless.org

2009-11-09 Thread tosh
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 06:16:43PM -0600, tosh wrote: > >> unsubscribe >> > > For fuck's sake! It's not that hard, and we've just had this discussion. > Well, I hope you can figure this one out yourself, or I suppose you'll have > to stay sub

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscr...@suckless.org

2009-11-09 Thread Kris Maglione
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 06:16:43PM -0600, tosh wrote: unsubscribe For fuck's sake! It's not that hard, and we've just had this discussion. Well, I hope you can figure this one out yourself, or I suppose you'll have to stay subscribed. -- Kris Maglione Pessimists, we're told, look at a glas

[dev] dev+unsubscr...@suckless.org

2009-11-09 Thread tosh
unsubscribe

[dev] dmc news

2009-11-09 Thread pancake
Hello everyone! I'm writing this lines because the delayed release of dmc that was announced few mails ago. The reason for the lagged release is because of the lack of time to finish the design and implementation :( We plan to release it before the end of the year ;) hopefully before the end of

Re: [dev] [surf] trouble on last tip

2009-11-09 Thread Tadeusz Sośnierz
On 9-11-2009 23:12:29, Julien Steinhauser wrote: > Hello, > on a fresh last tip surf build, i experience trouble with suckless.org home > page > when i launch for example : > surf http://suckless.org > the page doesn't load and in dwm status bar it blinks alternatively > [0%] http://suckless.org

[dev] [surf] trouble on last tip

2009-11-09 Thread Julien Steinhauser
Hello, on a fresh last tip surf build, i experience trouble with suckless.org home page when i launch for example : surf http://suckless.org the page doesn't load and in dwm status bar it blinks alternatively [0%] http://suckless.org and suckless.org Dedicated to software that suck less With other

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread Moritz Wilhelmy
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:47:00PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote: > [2009-11-09 10:21] Kris Maglione > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:02:56PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote: > > > > > >Aren't they able to take a look at the List-Unsubscribe header? > > > > Apparently. Look closely: > > > To: "dev+un

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-11-09 10:21] Kris Maglione > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:02:56PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote: > > > >Aren't they able to take a look at the List-Unsubscribe header? > > Apparently. Look closely: > To: "dev+unsubscr...@suckless.org" *LOL* meillo

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread Kris Maglione
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:02:56PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote: [2009-11-09 09:35] Kris Maglione On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:30:41AM -0500, Robert C Corsaro wrote: >dev+unsubscribe Annoying, isn't it? How many people do I have to manually unsubscribe? Aren't they able to take a look at the L

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-11-09 09:35] Kris Maglione > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:30:41AM -0500, Robert C Corsaro wrote: > >dev+unsubscribe > > Annoying, isn't it? How many people do I have to manually > unsubscribe? Aren't they able to take a look at the List-Unsubscribe header? meillo

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread Kris Maglione
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:30:41AM -0500, Robert C Corsaro wrote: dev+unsubscribe Annoying, isn't it? How many people do I have to manually unsubscribe? -- Kris Maglione For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. --H. L. Mencken

[dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread Robert C Corsaro
dev+unsubscribe

Re: [dev] Local vs global variables

2009-11-09 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 11/9/09, A.J. Gardner wrote: > Remember that every subscriber to this list receives your email when > you click send. Think hard about whether EVERYONE should have to read > your email. > i don't mind random discussions.. if they are technical anyway there are cases when mutable globals are u

Re: [dev] [st] a real (I think) feature request

2009-11-09 Thread Moritz Wilhelmy
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 11:46:31PM -0800, Mark Edgar wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Robert C Corsaro wrote: > > It reminds me of your typical IRC client.  transcript above and one line of > > command at the bottom. > > sirc's ssfe implements this in a standalone application: > http://ww