On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:48:46 -0800
Chris Palmer wrote:
> The key question this thread needs to answer is, is it stupider to argue
> about programming languages, or about revision control systems? (For the
> sake of argument, let's assume everyone already agrees that it is maximally
> stupid to ar
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:52:09 +0100
Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Kris Maglione
> wrote:
> > Ooh! Uriel 2.0!
>
> You mean, Uriel changeset 42 dead0beef15d ?
>
touche
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> Ooh! Uriel 2.0!
You mean, Uriel changeset 42 dead0beef15d ?
On 2010-02-14, Jacob Todd wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 04:04:54PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
>> So what is your point? Everything has to be written in C? This is
>> mindbogglingly stupid. Not only is C; high maintenance, slow
>> development cycle, insecure but also extremely low level.
>
> W