Re: [dev] Why use Mercurial?

2010-02-15 Thread Sebastian Goll
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:48:46 -0800 Chris Palmer wrote: > The key question this thread needs to answer is, is it stupider to argue > about programming languages, or about revision control systems? (For the > sake of argument, let's assume everyone already agrees that it is maximally > stupid to ar

Re: [dev] Why use Mercurial?

2010-02-15 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:52:09 +0100 Aurélien Aptel wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Kris Maglione > wrote: > > Ooh! Uriel 2.0! > > You mean, Uriel changeset 42 dead0beef15d ? > touche

Re: [dev] Why use Mercurial?

2010-02-15 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Kris Maglione wrote: > Ooh! Uriel 2.0! You mean, Uriel changeset 42 dead0beef15d ?

Re: [dev] Why use Mercurial?

2010-02-15 Thread Kris Maglione
On 2010-02-14, Jacob Todd wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 04:04:54PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote: >> So what is your point? Everything has to be written in C? This is >> mindbogglingly stupid. Not only is C; high maintenance, slow >> development cycle, insecure but also extremely low level. > > W