Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Marvin Vek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:33:00PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote: > slock was written for people who don't need to log in with a goddamn > retinal scanner, and I hope to god people one day stop cramming > 'features' into simple software. I'm talking to you, dmenu Oh, finally, for the last couple of w

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey, On 16 November 2010 17:33, Kurt H Maier wrote: > and I hope to god people one day stop cramming 'features' > into simple software.  I'm talking to you, dmenu If someone has a use case for something it makes sense to make a patch. One of the benefits of our simple software is that it's very

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Uriel wrote: > And Glenda bless Slackware and OpenBSD from standing against the > idiotic insanity that is PAM. For the record, OpenBSD looked at Slackware's solution and ported it to bsd_auth. it can't possibly be that hard to adapt slock to just about any auth

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > the slackware people peat on policykit unitl it worked without pam, > why are we moving the other direction Because I suspect 'suckless' should be renamed 'suckass'. The amount of totally retarded evil shit that gets proposed in this list is

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Kurt H Maier
the slackware people peat on policykit unitl it worked without pam, why are we moving the other direction -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread pancake
On 11/16/10 13:00, Petr Sabata wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:09:54PM +0100, pancake wrote: On 11/16/10 11:46, Petr Sabata wrote: Hey, this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try with Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't work everywhere :) Maybe it co

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Petr Sabata
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:09:54PM +0100, pancake wrote: > On 11/16/10 11:46, Petr Sabata wrote: > >Hey, > > > >this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try with > >Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't work everywhere :) Maybe > >it could be useful to some...

Re: [dev][st] multibyte patch

2010-11-16 Thread Damian Okrasa
2010/11/15, Aurélien Aptel : > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Damian Okrasa wrote: >> I removed the wchar_t completely, added some UTF-8 parsing functions. >> No support for combining, bidi, doublecolumn etc. Markus Kuhn's UTF-8 >> stress test file is not working 100% correctly (the decoder wo

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, pancake wrote: > On 11/16/10 11:46, Petr Sabata wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try >> with >> Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't work everywhere :) Maybe >> it could be useful to some...

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread pancake
On 11/16/10 11:46, Petr Sabata wrote: Hey, this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try with Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't work everywhere :) Maybe it could be useful to some... few time ago i send a patch adding support for user defined password,

[dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Petr Sabata
Hey, this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try with Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't work everywhere :) Maybe it could be useful to some... -- Petr 'contyk' Sabata, Red Hat, Brno () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.o