On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:24:38PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
Hoi,
at my university PAM is used for user login. They have slock installed
because they have the suckless-tools package (Ubuntu) installed.
If I run slock , X gets locked like it should. Unfortunately I'm not
able to unlock
Hi all
Two little patches for quark:
1. use strsignal()
2. clean up whitespace/indentation
If useful, you'd maybe want to apply them upstream.
Regards
--
Džen
diff -r d982c42802b4 quark.c
--- a/quark.c Wed Feb 16 20:29:55 2011 +
+++ b/quark.c Wed Apr 20 08:56:03 2011 +0200
@@ -472,14
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:09:03 +0200
emsee...@gmx.de wrote:
spec:
-latest, unpatched dwm
-gpu: radeon 5670, driver xf86-video-ati (radeon)
When I set an existing(!) font in config.h, moving around a floating window
works until it hits the statusbar and becomes very laggy.
It doesn't
Hi Everyone,
So I started using wmii a couple months ago. It was the first time I
wasn't using GNOME and it's default stuff and I did so because a friend
recommended wmii to me. So now I want to know what you all think. Why
are dwm and wmii better than other tiling WMs? Or not? And what are
For me dwm just works. I fiddled around with config.h for
maybe an hour after first getting dwm, and since then have
basically left it alone to do its wonders. It's reliable,
quick, and simple.
Plus it's well-written C, so I learn nicely as and when I
want to, poking around to see how things
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Eitan Goldshtrom
thesource...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are dwm and wmii better than other tiling WMs?
dwm is the only window manager that handles tagging properly.
wmii is not a window manager, it's an obscene object lesson in
unhinged kitchen-sink programming.
Hi,
attached is a patch for st-0.1.1 that will make the following changes:
- rewrote some of the drawing routines, should be faster now and allows to
draw the selection while selecting
- pressing ESC clears selection
- CTRL+left/right jumps words
I'm not sure it's implemented to your
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
wmii is not a window manager, it's an obscene object lesson in
unhinged kitchen-sink programming.
It's endlessly configurable while it's running, which is very convenient.
I prefer dwm/wmii to xmonad because I don't know
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Eitan Goldshtrom wrote:
Why are dwm and wmii better than other tiling WMs?
I like wmii because it (1) has dynamic tagging, views, and columns;
and (2) is configurable in any programming language (I use Ruby[1]).
I've been using wmii since 2005; occasionally
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Andrew Hills hills...@gmail.com wrote:
It's endlessly configurable while it's running, which is very convenient.
If a program requires endless configuration, it's a bad program.
--
# Kurt H Maier
I like dwm because of the simplicity of the product itself. It's essentially
the simplest example of what I think a tiling window manager should be. I
prefer the Master / Slave idea to Wmii's columns, and dwm implements it in
it's most basic form.
Excerpts from Suraj Kurapati's message of Wed Apr 20 19:39:00 +0200 2011:
wmii is not perfect, but it does more of what I want than other WMs
I've tried (perhaps I haven't tried enough of them). I hope Kris
returns someday to continue its development; I fear it's abandoned.
I also use wmii -
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
If a program requires endless configuration, it's a bad program.
The program doesn't require it; I do.
--Andrew Hills
Line buffer editing/positioning shouldn't be handled by st itself, it
should be delegated to an external tools (most likely the shell). Else
none of ^e, ^a, and such keystrokes should be available/hardcoded into
the terminal emulator. We should think in terms of shell container
rather than
Uhm... Maybe swk can benefit from this work.. This remembers me to libdraw..
On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Claudio smo...@gmail.com wrote:
Line buffer editing/positioning shouldn't be handled by st itself, it
should be delegated to an external tools (most likely the shell). Else
none of ^e,
Excerpts from Suraj Kurapati's message of Wed Apr 20 19:39:00 +0200 2011:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Eitan Goldshtrom wrote:
Why are dwm and wmii better than other tiling WMs?
I like wmii because it (1) has dynamic tagging,
+1
the /only/ way to do it, in my not so humble opinion ;)
On 04/20/2011 10:27 AM, Eitan Goldshtrom wrote:
Hi Everyone,
So I started using wmii a couple months ago. It was the first time I
wasn't using GNOME and it's default stuff and I did so because a
friend recommended wmii to me. So now I want to know what you all
think. Why are dwm and wmii
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:00 PM, dtk d@gmx.de wrote:
Excerpts from Suraj Kurapati's message:
is configurable in any programming language (I use Ruby[1]).
so do i, but it segfaults on me when i start wireshark -.- dunno,
maybe it's due to my modifications (added 'toggle last view' patch
18 matches
Mail list logo
