On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:20:29AM +0100, Piotr Zalewa wrote:
Hi,
I want to create a script which will load my default setup (quite a
few programs).
How to run a program so it will be displayed on a desired tab?
(view, workspace - I always had a problem with that lingo)
In wmii, you can
Hey,
On 6 June 2011 09:35, Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
This is self-explanatory...
Applied, thanks.
Connor
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:52:32PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
Hey,
On 6 June 2011 09:35, Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
This is self-explanatory...
Applied, thanks.
Awesome.
While you're updating those small tools, any chance of getting this in?
On 06/06/11 11:40, ilf wrote:
On 06-06 11:20, Piotr Zalewa wrote:
I want to create a script which will load my default setup (quite a
few programs).
I use .xinitrc for this.
I don't want to do it every time
How to run a program so it will be displayed on a desired tab? (view,
workspace -
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:35:56 +0200
Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
+ @mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}${MANPREFIX}/man1
This is the sort of thing which has people symlinking man - share/man or vice
versa.
2011/6/6 Piotr Zalewa zal...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I want to create a script which will load my default setup (quite a few
programs).
How to run a program so it will be displayed on a desired tab? (view,
workspace - I always had a problem with that lingo)
I have used xdotool for this. I've been
On 06/06/11 15:41, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
Hey,
2011/6/6 Piotr Zalewazal...@gmail.com:
How to run a program so it will be displayed on a desired tab? (view,
workspace - I always had a problem with that lingo)
So are we talking about wmii or dwm or what?
wmii
zalun
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Piotr Zalewa zal...@gmail.com wrote:
wmii
The problem has become insoluble. Even locating all possible
solutions is NP-hard.
--
# Kurt H Maier
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Guilherme Lino guih.l...@gmail.com wrote:
whene you dont have your pc, read a book.. i think thats the most suckless
way
No, not really...
--Andrew Hills
a book about plan9?
--
Guilherme Lino
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Andrew Hills hills...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Guilherme Lino guih.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
whene you dont have your pc, read a book.. i think thats the most
suckless
way
No, not really...
non-electronic books suck because you can't easily search in, or
copypaste from them.
maybe you need a tablet or one of those ebook readers.
Dieter
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:42:29 +0100
Guilherme Lino guih.l...@gmail.com wrote:
a book about plan9?
--
Guilherme Lino
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Guilherme Lino guih.l...@gmail.com wrote:
i would recomend a cheap phone, that make calls and sends smSs..
whene you dont have your pc, read a book.. i think thats the most suckless
way
Amen.
--
Guilherme Lino
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:36:24PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:35:56 +0200
Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
+ @mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}${MANPREFIX}/man1
This is the sort of thing which has people symlinking man - share/man or
vice versa.
I really don't
On 6 June 2011 17:45, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
non-electronic books suck because you can't easily search in, or
copypaste from them.
Let's talk again in 40 years if you can still read your ebooks by then :)
I stay loyal to real books.
--garbeam
I was wondering about which way would be the easiest/simplest to
serialize data, f.e. being read via a file or stdin (data being a
table of x rows and y columns, each cell a string). I thought of
using NULL bytes as cell delimiters and newline characters as row
delimiters. This way it wouldn't be
I do, but only in phone, laptop/desktop/ebook screens sucks for reading.
On 06/06/11 19:24, Guilherme Lino wrote:
electronic books suck because you dont actually read them
--
Guilherme Lino
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be
mailto:die...@plaetinck.be
that's only because i have no ebook reader yet.
because they all suck.
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:24:16 +0100
Guilherme Lino guih.l...@gmail.com wrote:
electronic books suck because you dont actually read them
--
Guilherme Lino
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Dieter Plaetinck
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:19:56 +0200
Džen yvl...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering about which way would be the easiest/simplest to
serialize data, f.e. being read via a file or stdin (data being a
table of x rows and y columns, each cell a string). I thought of
using NULL bytes as cell
I agree with that. phone screens are the least sucky to read ebooks on.
Dieter
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:34:20 +0200
pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote:
I do, but only in phone, laptop/desktop/ebook screens sucks for
reading.
On 06/06/11 19:24, Guilherme Lino wrote:
electronic books suck
In the ASCII table there's a record separator character (0x1E). At
least I think is better than using '\0'.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Džen yvl...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering about which way would be the easiest/simplest to
serialize data, f.e. being read via a file or stdin (data
i mostly do this when i'm at bed (before waking up and when going to
sleep), the phone/pda/itt/...
screen size is the best one for this situation, and it's usually more
comfortable than any other
gadget, it brights on the dark, it's small and you can manage it with
just one finger without pain.
On 06/06/2011 19:36, Douglas S. Bregolin wrote:
In the ASCII table there's a record separator character (0x1E). At
least I think is better than using '\0'.
On 06/06/2011 19:42, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
then why wasn't \x1C-\x1F used before for a data exchange format?
To be honest, I've
Hey,
On 6 June 2011 18:19, Džen yvl...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering about which way would be the easiest/simplest to
serialize data, f.e. being read via a file or stdin (data being a
table of x rows and y columns, each cell a string). I thought of
using NULL bytes as cell delimiters and
On 6 June 2011 19:22, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
0x000d 0x0006 hello\0 0x0007 world!\0
I made a mistake here, I meant to say...
0x0011 0x0006 hello\0 0x0007 world!\0
... including two 2-byte cell widths in the row width.
hello,
if you were referring to dwm rather than wmii...
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:49:57PM +0100, Piotr Zalewa wrote:
I want to create a script which will load my default setup (quite a
few programs).
I use .xinitrc for this.
... or .xsession
I don't want to do it every time
then create
Hey,
On 6 June 2011 19:25, David Tweed david.tw...@gmail.com wrote:
(In general, I'm always a bit surprised how it seems to be perceived
to be suckless to proscribe the user-level tasks that are allowed. How
those are implemented yes, but saying that classes of activity are not
acceptable?)
Pretty much answers my question. In my use case it'd be easier to use
delimiters like \0 or \n, due to the data not being binary. However now
I wonder, which method would need more cpu time? I suppose that when
using delimiters there isn't a easier way than using fgetc(), reading
through the
On 6 June 2011 20:07, Džen yvl...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder, which method would need more cpu time? I suppose that when
using delimiters there isn't a easier way than using fgetc(), reading
through the whole data stream. Hard-coded field lengths would be faster
if the fields contain a lot of
Hey,
On 6 June 2011 22:10, Troels Henriksen at...@sigkill.dk wrote:
If . is part of your PATH (leaving aside questions of whether this is a
good idea), dmenu_path can be very slow, as it searches the entire tree
from the working directory for binaries, despite the fact that only
those
On 6 June 2011 14:05, Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
While you're updating those small tools, any chance of getting this in?
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1105/8047.html
As I just discovered, lsx doesn't appear to have its own repo. I'm
unsure why. But no, I apparently can't. ;)
cls
On 06/06/11 12:20, Piotr Zalewa wrote:
Hi,
I want to create a script which will load my default setup (quite a few
programs).
How to run a program so it will be displayed on a desired tab? (view,
workspace - I always had a problem with that lingo)
thanks,
zalun
Assuming you are using sh
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:16:49 +
Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
It's just that I believe spawning processes and creating windows
should be dirt cheap operations. Optimally, almost nothing should be
done in those functions.
With Gtk+ 2.OMGWANTMOARBLOAT invading computers
On Mon 06 Jun 2011 06:16:22 PM PDT, garbeam wrote:
On 6 June 2011 17:45, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
non-electronic books suck because you can't easily search in, or
copypaste from them.
Let's talk again in 40 years if you can still read your ebooks by
then :) I stay loyal to real books.
+1
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:42:20 +0200
Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:36:24PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:35:56 +0200
Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
+ @mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}${MANPREFIX}/man1
This is the sort of thing
Reason why I'm asking is because I was wondering how a dmenu-alike
utility would read data, where each items has multiple values, not
just one. Kinda like a search utility for table-structured data.
Interesting, you seem to be on the right track.
The problem has become insoluble. Even locating all possible
solutions is NP-hard.
I don't get it.
36 matches
Mail list logo
