On 12 September 2011 23:17, Roman Z. wrote:
> I've deactivated the "focus follows mouse" feature. I did this by
> commenting out the enternotify event handler:
>
> static void (*handler[LASTEvent]) (XEvent *) = {
> /* [EnterNotify] = enternotify, */
>
> But now I'm experiencing this problem: Whe
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:05:16PM +0100, Rob wrote:
> I don't think this would be worth it, suckless tools are supposed to be
> lightweight, even someone who hasn't seen the code before can make
> changes, they don't have to be an expert at C, so merging a few lines
> here and there is no big deal
Hello!
I've deactivated the "focus follows mouse" feature. I did this by
commenting out the enternotify event handler:
static void (*handler[LASTEvent]) (XEvent *) = {
/* [EnterNotify] = enternotify, */
But now I'm experiencing this problem: Whenever I click into an
unfocused window, it is no
On 12 September 2011 14:26, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> I wonder if we could restructure the code a bit in such a way, that
> all patches can be independent again and user can combine the patches
> they want without hitting conflicts.
I don't think this would be worth it, suckless tools are suppose
> > > How do people feel about tok in mainline? Might be worth discussing.
I also like it. It is useful for filenames: zathura $(find *.pdf | dmenu -t)
Peter
--
sic dicit magister P
University of Toronto / Fordham University
Collins Hall B06; Office Hours TF10-12
http://individual.utoronto.ca/
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:34:04 +0200
sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> * Connor Lane Smith [2011-09-12 15:52]:
> > How do people feel about tok in mainline? Might be worth discussing.
>
> token matching? almost meaningless for program names. very helpful for
> natural language, structured entries (d
* Connor Lane Smith [2011-09-12 15:52]:
> How do people feel about tok in mainline? Might be worth discussing.
token matching? almost meaningless for program names. very helpful for
natural language, structured entries (directory tree, URIs). So:
+1
--
stanio_
On 12 September 2011 14:26, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> pushed where?
http://hg.suckless.org/sites
Anyone can commit, but we pull it to the actual site manually. (And I
don't have my key atm.) So feel free to add stuff yourself. :]
> I wonder if we could restructure the code a bit in such a way,
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:51:48 +0100
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 12 September 2011 10:20, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > Thank you for that bloat patch!
> > I didn't realise it could be this simple.
>
> dmenu is very easy to hack. ;)
>
> > I did see a bug:
> > when using token matching, it seem
On 12 September 2011 10:20, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> Thank you for that bloat patch!
> I didn't realise it could be this simple.
dmenu is very easy to hack. ;)
> I did see a bug:
> when using token matching, it seems dmenu will always do stable sort, even
> when -s is not given.
Yeah, that's
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:49:38 +0100
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Attached are two diffs, my token patch updated to 4.4, and a bloat
> patch ;) which provides everything you wanted.
>
> cls
Thank you for that bloat patch!
I didn't realise it could be this simple.
I did see a bug:
when using token m
11 matches
Mail list logo
