Re: [dev] [dwm] merging bottom stack?

2011-09-26 Thread Bryan Bennett
Casting a vote in favor of merging this. Bstack is one patch I simply cannot live without on a 4:3 (1280x1024) monitor. Either Nmaster or the "regular" bstack patch would be fine in my book.

Re: [dev] Re: Suckless sh [Was: Re: New utility]

2011-09-26 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:47:58 + Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > >> rc's redirection syntax is remarkably clean and powerful, but it > >> shouldn't be very hard to hack "2>&1" support in there if you don't want > >> to use ">[2=1]". > > > > Actually I find rc's way less annoying than bash's but the

Re: [dev] [dwm] merging bottom stack?

2011-09-26 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 26 September 2011 23:29, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > On 26 September 2011 21:43, Nick wrote: >> Just wondering what people think about the idea of merging the >> bstack layout patch to the plain vanilla dwm? It's pretty >> non-intrusive, and a very useful layout for small screens (where the >>

[dev] [surf] Tiny patch

2011-09-26 Thread Nick
Attached is a patch updating the surf manpage to reflect the correct keybinding for find. diff -r 2533f186089d surf.1 --- a/surf.1Thu Mar 31 12:52:35 2011 +0200 +++ b/surf.1Mon Sep 26 22:48:44 2011 +0100 @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ .B Ctrl\-Shift\-i Resets Zoom .TP -.B Ctrl\-/ +.B Ctrl\-f Opens

Re: [dev] [dwm] merging bottom stack?

2011-09-26 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey, On 26 September 2011 21:43, Nick wrote: > Just wondering what people think about the idea of merging the > bstack layout patch to the plain vanilla dwm? It's pretty > non-intrusive, and a very useful layout for small screens (where the > regular tiled layout results in excess line wrapping).

Re: [dev] [dwm] merging bottom stack?

2011-09-26 Thread Justin Pogue
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:52 PM, G David Modica wrote: > On 21:43 Mon 26 Sep     , Nick wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Just wondering what people think about the idea of merging the >> bstack layout patch to the plain vanilla dwm? It's pretty >> non-intrusive, and a very useful layout for small screens

Re: [dev] [dwm] merging bottom stack?

2011-09-26 Thread G David Modica
On 21:43 Mon 26 Sep , Nick wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just wondering what people think about the idea of merging the > bstack layout patch to the plain vanilla dwm? It's pretty > non-intrusive, and a very useful layout for small screens (where the > regular tiled layout results in excess line w

[dev] [dwm] merging bottom stack?

2011-09-26 Thread Nick
Hi folks, Just wondering what people think about the idea of merging the bstack layout patch to the plain vanilla dwm? It's pretty non-intrusive, and a very useful layout for small screens (where the regular tiled layout results in excess line wrapping). The patch I refer to is http://dwm.suck

Re: [dev] Re: Suckless sh [Was: Re: New utility]

2011-09-26 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:17:23 +0200 > Christian Neukirchen wrote: > >> Ethan Grammatikidis writes: >> > Shell language in general, as a tool to use. It's not just cp & mv, > there are other things. > cp -r and mv -r should be split int

[dev] Fwd: Not subscribed to dev@suckless.org

2011-09-26 Thread Alain Greppin
Hello, I'm still receiving messages from this list. It seems that I'm not subscribed. Please, remove me/unsubscribe me from this list. Regards, agrep...@chilibi.org Original Message Subject: Not subscribed to dev@suckless.org Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:30:55 +0200 From: dev+h...