On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
Panels are a part of a different interface paradigm. dwm does not
have desktops. This is another example of software that shouldn't be
crammed into dwm.
Yet dwm sports a half-assed status bar that works as an
On 17/10/2011, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
a half-assed status bar that works as an application launcher
dmenu != dwm
cls
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius
svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
Yet dwm sports a half-assed status bar that works as an application
launcher and clock. This could be implemented more modularily by
XEmbedding... although it would probably wind more complicated than
necessary.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
On 17/10/2011, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
dmenu != dwm
Try clicking the title (selmon-bar IIRC). Wait for a terminal
emulator to spawn.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius
svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
Try clicking the title (selmon-bar IIRC). Wait for a terminal
emulator to spawn.
What? No. What code do you see that's supposed to do that? Did you
put that into your config.h?
--
# Kurt H Maier
On 17/10/2011, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
What? No. What code do you see that's supposed to do that? Did you
put that into your config.h?
config.def.h:93
On 17/10/2011, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
Try clicking the title (selmon-bar IIRC). Wait for a terminal
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:08:04AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius
svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
Try clicking the title (selmon-bar IIRC). Wait for a terminal
emulator to spawn.
What? No. What code do you see that's supposed to do that? Did
That's not exactly what I'd describe as an application launcher, but I
still don't understand what you're complaining about. If you want to
change dwm's status bar, customise your buttons[]. (And a clock?
That's just the root window title.)
I'm really not convinced a generic status bar
On 2011-10-16, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
First, docking is generally useful for panels. Dwm sucks as a status
bar. Should the information displayed in the status bar not be
properties on the root
On 17/10/2011, Peter John Hartman peterjohnhart...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I care about statusbars and dockbars--I just want dwm to play nice
with onscreen keyboards---I think, that said, that his point is that there's
no conceptual tension between dwm and a statusbar *since dwm has a
Somebody claiming to be Peter John Hartman wrote:
I'm really not convinced a generic status bar would work better than
dwm's does now.
Not that I care about statusbars and dockbars--I just want dwm to play nice
with onscreen keyboards---I think, that said, that his point is that there's
no
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
their status bar without a bunch of garish icons; text will suffice.
Yes, but using fancy fonts. Thankfully, patching is possible. Thus my
point is moot.
Robert Pansom wrote:
I would think you'ld *like* setting _NET_NUMBER_OF_DESKTOPS to 2^10 by
Or 2^9-1. But your point
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Stephen Paul Weber
singpol...@singpolyma.net wrote:
Isn't docking really just another layout? One where most windows tile
below a window kept at the top/side?
Kinda, but it then it depends on recursive window management.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
It's in the default dwm config, line 93...
Woops. I guess I should probably glance at config.def.h once in a
while. I must have removed that so long ago that it was lost in the
mists of brain.
--
# Kurt H Maier
Great! Something I've been waiting for a ling time!
It would be nice on the wiki!
Le 00:57:33 le 17 oct. 2011 , Connor Lane Smith a écrit :
Hey all,
In case anyone's interested, here's a patch which adds some basic
mouse support to dmenu.
You can click things, click the paginators ( and
I've started using st and have some questions/issues:
1) To get the foreground colour I want, I changed index 7 of colorname[] to
grey -- will this have any strange site effects?
2) The foreground colour brightblack in mutt (which shows as a grey in
xterm/rxvt) shows as straight black, which
Invent the C programming language and UNIX, then die: nobody gives a shit.
Market other people's technologies to rich white kids, then die: HE WAS LIKE
FCUKING EINSTEIN ZOMG EDISON WTFBBQ.
--
Džen
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:44:19AM -0500, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:
3) How do I scroll up the scrollbuffer? The Shift+PageUp I'm used
to does not seem to work.
This isn't implemented in st yet, sadly. Some people are
happy having tmux manage scrollback stuff.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Somebody claiming to be Connor Lane Smith wrote:
On 17/10/2011, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.net wrote:
4) alt+leftarrow and alt+rightarrow, which I use in irssi to swich chats, do
not seem to work. Looking at st.c, it seems that
On Mon 17 Oct 2011 02:29:43 PM PDT, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
Separating the status bar from the window manager would require us
to fill root with atoms, or else invent our own IPC protocol, and
it would generally get quite messy.
That's what wmii does, where IPC is done via the 9P2000
A 5,000-line library to handle status bar IPC. Super.
--
# Kurt H Maier
A 5,000-line library to handle status bar IPC. Super.
It's not only used for the status bar
22 matches
Mail list logo
