On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius
svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
if the task is 'waste a bunch of screen real estate' then no, ranger
is a far better choice
The current combination of a shell and a terminal emulator is
horrible. I've found myself doing stuff like:
exec
On 24.10.2011 00:10, pancake wrote:
Use sloccount. It doesnt matters how do you indent with this tool..
Well, some syntaxes are not handled at all like if().. And if()\n..
But you get proper loccount
Thanks for the info. I've used sloccount before but never tried to
understand how it computes
On 21.10.2011 00:00, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
Hi,
I know st rendering is slow. I'm currently trying out different
solutions but I can tell you profiling X calls is no fun.
tip now uses a simple dirty flag per line algorithm.
Each modified line has the flag set to 1. Only dirty lines are
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:35:00 +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
[...]
So I think the necessary next step would be to have a strongly typed
shell. To pretty-print you'd need to add a polymorphic à la carte
(multiple dispatch) pretty-printing function for the given data type.
The type inference would
On 10/24/11 at 10:30am, Kurt H Maier wrote:
users don't give a shit about software licensing
I do.
--
# Kurt H Maier
--
Somebody claiming to be mikshaw wrote:
From: Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com
only an idiot compares a software license to slavery.
As far as the cc-nd license RMS apparently prefers for his own audio, I
fully agree this is hypocritical and wrong.
Not to wade into a flametroll war, but for
So I guess that means no auto-tuned Richard Stallman huh?
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Stephen Paul Weber
singpol...@singpolyma.net wrote:
Somebody claiming to be mikshaw wrote:
From: Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com
only an idiot compares a software license to slavery.
As far as
On 24 October 2011 12:52, Florian Limberger f...@snakeoilproductions.net
wrote:
Are you talking about Windows PowerShell? It's even object oriented!111
Object orientation is what happens when people who don't understand
higher-order functions or multiple dispatch try to invent a
programming
The GPL is nothing more than Richard Stallman's highly encumbered
temper-tantrum against propriety software, it has almost nothing to do
with true freedom.
Eloquently sums up my issue with the GPL itself as well as the FSF in
general.
- Original Message -
From: Al Gest
In the real world a person's freedoms are very much decided by their
ability to obtain those freedoms. That might not fall in line with
your moralistic ideologies, but it is reality.
The GPL is nothing more than Richard Stallman's highly
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:54:18 +0200
Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at wrote:
Primarily, the GPL balances freedom towards the agenda of the FSF and
their specific interpretation of the term freedom.
-ak
Copyleft or not? This is never ending discussion, mostly ideological.
GPL has many
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:00 PM, mikshaw mrb...@yahoo.com wrote:
If you're stifling another person's freedoms, you're doing something bad.
Not giving you stuff is not stifling your freedom.
They're free only up to the point when a dev decides to turn the code
into a proprietary product...
At
On 24 October 2011 14:00, mikshaw mrb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Unrestricted freedom is impossible
And there's no such thing as restricted freedom.
I just disagree with people who support those licenses while rabidly
claiming the GPL to be some kind of evil cancer.
But the GPL is *designed*
Greetings comrades.
On 24.10.2011 20:10, Corey Thomasson wrote:
On 24 October 2011 14:00, mikshaw mrb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Unrestricted freedom is impossible
And there's no such thing as restricted freedom.
There is positive discrimination too.
I just disagree with people who support
On 10 October 2011 20:53, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
On 10/10/2011, Matthew Phillips ma...@cpan.org wrote:
I stumbled on an odd dwm X11 bug yesterday. Resize any window (a terminal
works) to 4-5 times the width of your screens resolution, and at some point
the floating superwide
On 24 October 2011 00:05, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, how's sta.li progressing?
Still paused.
Cheers,
Anselm
On 23/10/2011 23:43, Kurt H Maier wrote:
[...]
ls /usr/bin/ ls /usr/local/bin
Your one-liner sucks. Talking about CLI tools, most of all we should be
precise at how to use them correctly; otherwise how would we be able to
decide whether they are useful or not? How about
ls /usr/bin
Hey,
On 24/10/2011, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Unmapping proved to be a bit slower, which is why I used the window
moving trick. I guess the best is to move the windows into negative x
land to have a proper fix.
I suspect we'd have the same problem if we were to move the windows
On 24 October 2011 22:46, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
On 24/10/2011, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Unmapping proved to be a bit slower, which is why I used the window
moving trick. I guess the best is to move the windows into negative x
land to have a proper fix.
I
Is wmii relocated to a different domain/host now?
Cheers,
Anselm
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Džen yvl...@gmail.com wrote:
ls /usr/bin /usr/local/bin
why bother listing /usr/local/bin if /usr/bin isn't around?
(actually I started with a much more complicated (and complete)
version and edited it down to that. no optimization passes were
- Original Message -
From: Džen yvl...@gmail.com
On 23/10/2011 23:43, Kurt H Maier wrote:
[...]
ls /usr/bin/ ls /usr/local/bin
Your one-liner sucks. Talking about CLI tools, most of all we should be
precise at how to use them correctly; otherwise how would we be able to
;)
On 24/10/2011 22:59, Kurt H Maier wrote:
why bother listing /usr/local/bin if /usr/bin isn't around?
Why not?
(actually I started with a much more complicated (and complete)
version and edited it down to that. no optimization passes were
performed.)
Something like
ls `IFS=:;
On 24/10/2011 23:13, mikshaw wrote:
What about
ls /usr/{,local}/bin
OK, regarding information density in a one-liner you win.
--
Džen
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Džen
OK, regarding information density in a one-liner you win.
can be extended:
ls /{,usr/{,local/}}{,s}bin
(at least it works in ksh)
well, I'm glad we at least got something useful out of this thread.
--
# Kurt H Maier
On 24/10/2011, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
How come? The negative land is not mapped.
I would have expected the window to reach the same invisible limit as
it does when moved to the right. But according to Matt on IRC it works
fine if you patch dwm to move the window left instead of
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Unmapping proved to be a bit slower, which is why I used the window
moving trick. I guess the best is to move the windows into negative x
land to have a proper fix.
How much slower? Unmapping would seem to be more
Something like
ls `IFS=:; echo $PATH`
no no, just
IFS=:; ls $PATH
-Evan
Something like
ls `IFS=:; echo $PATH`
no no, just
IFS=:; ls $PATH
-Evan
Really wish I had an undo send feature...
(IFS=:; ls $PATH)
-Evan
29 matches
Mail list logo
