Object orientation is downloading flash to participate in off-topic
meta discussions.
And here are the super fancy slides in OpenOffice format.
Stopped here. This guy is not qualified to rant.
I guess no wmii guy will take your freedom to delete. But please also
remember potential new user's freedoms.
I reserve my rights to sue anybody involved in this megafuckup with
the help of net neutrality laws. I guess I'll also call RMS and ask
him to create a poll or so.
that guy is wrong in so many ways I won't even bother to mention any specifics.
Sure, the stuff he mentions is somewhat correlated to the real problems with
spare time open source software, but his interpretations and solutions, oh
my. He doesn't really know what he's talking about.
Dieter
On 26 Oct 2011, at 17:12, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jimmy Tang jt...@tchpc.tcd.ie wrote:
just showed this to a friend of mine and he cooked this up
ls ${PATH//:/ }
shit only works in bash
oddly it worked in mksh which is the main shell that i tend to use.
On 10/27/11, Jimmy Tang jt...@tchpc.tcd.ie wrote:
On 26 Oct 2011, at 17:12, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jimmy Tang jt...@tchpc.tcd.ie wrote:
just showed this to a friend of mine and he cooked this up
ls ${PATH//:/ }
shit only works in bash
oddly it worked in
[2011-10-27 09:05] Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com
Directory names are a sequence of arbitrary nonzero bytes. Parsing a
concatenation of arbitrary strings sucks. Directories can only be
separated by zero bytes.
That's actually a bug in Unix, discovered too late.
meillo
I just returned back to dwm after long time and I miss monocle mode. I
was searching in mailing list and commit messages, but I couldn't find
any mention of monocle mode being stripped out. Also, website of dwm
says, there are three modes (tiled, monocle, floating). Did I miss
something?
current dwm version is 5.9 try again
--
# Kurt H Maier
that explains few things..
thank you
On 10/27/2011 02:40 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
current dwm version is 5.9 try again
I watched this last night and raged pretty hard for 45 minutes. The
guy has somevalid points, but proposes absolutely no viable solution
for it. His pointregarding video editors requiring significant
dedicated development time andtheir non-existance for Linux, for
instance, is valid. Asking that
this video is not available sucks
You guys are so stupid if you think ./configure is great
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 16:04 +0200, hiro wrote:
You guys are so stupid if you think ./configure is great
beat me to it
I don't think anyone here actually feels that the monolith that most configure
scripts become is a good thing. However, that's not within the scope of what's
going on here - the idea being that ./configure is a necessary part of compiling
a sizable portion of software. Saying that we need a
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:02:46 +0200, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
this video is not available sucks
Don't worry, you're not missing out on anything, besides the guy
making a total fool of himself in front of a totally oblivious
audience (which is just annoying; no comical value
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:04:21 +0200, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
You guys are so stupid if you think ./configure is great
Nobody said anything of the like.
Are you projecting or something? ;)
Peace
--
Pieter
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Bryan Bennett bbenn...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think anyone here actually feels that the monolith that most configure
scripts become is a good thing. However, that's not within the scope of what's
going on here - the idea being that ./configure is a necessary
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:36:20 -, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
wrote:
That's actually a bug in Unix, discovered too late.
Yeah, and SQL injection attacks are PEBKAC problems. Tokenization by
insertion of whitespace into arbitrary strings is plain harmful. The bug
in Unix is caused by
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662862
On 10/26/11 00:22, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:52 PM, pancakepanc...@youterm.com wrote:
1) gtk3 apps when resized by using the corner widget (see gedit for example)
got hanged an capture the mouse. Only solution is to go to
Greetings.
On 27.10.2011 02:04, Guilherme Lino wrote:
yo
fund this.. it kind of old, but it rise some questions
http://lunduke.com/?p=429
how do you feel about this?
At least he is able to setup a website.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
Am 27.10.2011 17:57, schrieb Christoph Lohmann:
Greetings.
On 27.10.2011 02:04, Guilherme Lino wrote:
yo
fund this.. it kind of old, but it rise some questions
http://lunduke.com/?p=429
how do you feel about this?
At least he is able to setup a website.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
Hello,
After some discussion in #suckless here is a patch that allows
multiselect in dmenu. Ctrl+enter prints the selected item without
exiting dmenu, and changes its color.
Enjoy,
-emg
diff -r bebcf140b8a9 dmenu.1
--- a/dmenu.1 Wed Oct 26 14:16:12 2011 +0100
+++ b/dmenu.1 Thu Oct 27 12:56:43
yeah but the true is that a linux desktop is almost useless for a normal
person
i remember first time i used ubuntu. i started a openoffice presentation on
the 4th slide the system was already unusable. And wet back to windows, even
google docs was better for the job.
of course latex is cool,
I beg to differ.
beamer for my slideshows.
ledpar/ledmac for critical editions. (http://www.djdekker.net/)
latex for publications.
perl for searches (stanford encyclopedia of philosophy)
git for collaboration (buridanica.net)
antiword to read student papers
and i work in the HUMANITIES, baby.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Guilherme Lino guih.l...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah but the true is that a linux desktop is almost useless for a normal
person
i remember first time i used ubuntu. i started a openoffice presentation on
the 4th slide the system was already unusable. And wet back to
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Guilherme Lino guih.l...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah but the true is that a linux desktop is almost useless for a normal
person
who the fuck cares about normal people?
--
# Kurt H Maier
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:33:18 +0100, Guilherme Lino guih.l...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah but the true is that a linux desktop is almost useless for a normal
person
s/normal/uninformed
Also, see Kurt Maier's response [1].
i remember first time i used ubuntu. i started a openoffice presentation on
28 matches
Mail list logo
