Re: Regarding "make"-systems [Was: Re: [dev] Build system: redo]

2012-08-12 Thread Uriel
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote: > (I've changed the subject of the thread because I want to move the > discussion in a more "general" direction not specific to one build > system.) > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> The holy make rep

Re: Regarding "make"-systems [Was: Re: [dev] Build system: redo]

2012-08-12 Thread Uriel
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > (A) This suggests that we need a macro system. cpp(1) would bring us > #define, #ifdefs, and #include for free. This is good, because it > means we don't need to invent our own whole scripting subsystem. This is great because it shows yo

Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-12 Thread Uriel
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > I will transform this list to a moderated one, if the spamming and > trolling persists at current levels. The whining about the trolling is worse than the trolling itself. The original poster had a good point: the suckless name SUCKS. Sti