Greetings.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:54:01 +0100 Hiltjo Posthuma hil...@codemadness.org
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
Anyone has done the wget/curl scripts together to handle referer, cook‐
ies and whatever else is needed to fool websites, so
Greetings comrades,
I have been thinking of adding some easy way of adblocking to surf. My
conclusion is, that it is not needed.
By changing the default parameters of surf to »‐ips«, which will disable
all the scripts, the images and plugins by default, nothing wrong is
loaded when some
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 01:27:39PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
I have been thinking of adding some easy way of adblocking to surf. My
conclusion is, that it is not needed.
[...]
What are you comrades thinking of this?
I don't need adblocking inside the browser. I'm using a hosts
file
I block only in my DNS. I think it's the most important feature of my
home network. Not only because it blocks ads, but also because it
block fads.
On 11/20/12, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
Greetings comrades,
I have been thinking of adding some easy way of adblocking to surf. My
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
Hosts filtering re‐
quires some callback to filter on a specific hosts file with 15k
lines on every request.
Would it be possible to disable requests made by the page to any
address outside the page's domain?
I want web pages and pdfs to be rendered in the cloud, because my fan
is running hot.
also never forget:
if most web sites suck, use less web sites.
sorry if you consider this off-topic.
Hello,
I have problems with return key in configuration but haven't found anyone
with similar problem. I tried default combinations and also custom one but
the problem remains.
The problem is that, although key combinations with return key like
Mod-Shift-Return or Mod-Return work for a few minutes
does everyone write his mail in openoffice nowadays?
Yeah, I agree with the general feeling that adblocking shouldn't be
done in the browser. I prefer privoxy, though it's rather complex.
adsuck is another thing that probably does the job well. /etc/hosts
can do a reasonable job too, as others have mentioned.
Also, there is the fact that adblocking
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:53 PM, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
does everyone write his mail in openoffice nowadays?
How did you come up with that conclusion?
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:20:31PM +0100, Igor Blažević wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:53 PM, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
does everyone write his mail in openoffice nowadays?
How did you come up with that conclusion?
The HTML email you're sending, no doubt.
Sorry, I wrote it from gmail, not from within MUA since I cannot do that
momentarily. Does it create any problems for others?
When you write from GMail, please click the « Plain Text button
under the formatting bar.
--Andrew Hills
Dnia 20 listopada 2012 15:26 Igor Blažević ibla...@gmail.com napisał(a):
Sorry, I wrote it from gmail, not from within MUA since I cannot do
that momentarily. Does it create any problems for others?
Now gmail does not allow text emails?
Wow. We are truly living in future.
On the side note,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Dnia 20 listopada 2012 15:26 Igor Blažević ibla...@gmail.com napisał(a):
Now gmail does not allow text emails?
My fault:) Forgot about plain text option since not using gmail
through webmail that much:/
For easy reading - repost:
Hello,
I have problems with return key in configuration but haven't found
anyone with similar problem. I tried default combinations and also
custom one but the problem remains.
The problem is that, although key combinations with return key like
Mod-Shift-Return or
thanks, perhaps other gmail users can learn from this experience, too.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:08:01PM +, Nick wrote:
Yeah, I agree with the general feeling that adblocking shouldn't be
done in the browser.
wtf? the ads are DISPLAYED in the browser. it's stupid to blackhole
dns and let requests time out rather than just not making the request in
the first
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:15AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
wtf? the ads are DISPLAYED in the browser. it's stupid to blackhole
dns and let requests time out rather than just not making the request in
the first place.
The way I do it with a local proxy means that said requests are
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:30:38PM +, Nick wrote:
The way I do it with a local proxy means that said requests are
stripped out of the HTML before reaching the browser. DNS based
things will presumably fail immediately with /etc/hosts, rather
than time out.
But you're still wasting the
What about something like pixelserv (written in perl[1] or C[2]) with
something like hostsblock[3]?
It's a DNS solution, but the timeouts aren't a problem
1: http://proxytunnel.sourceforge.net/pixelserv.php
2:
Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in writes:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:30:38PM +, Nick wrote:
The way I do it with a local proxy means that said requests are
stripped out of the HTML before reaching the browser. DNS based
things will presumably fail immediately with /etc/hosts, rather
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 04:33:20PM +0100, Troels Henriksen wrote:
Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in writes:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:30:38PM +, Nick wrote:
The way I do it with a local proxy means that said requests are
stripped out of the HTML before reaching the browser. DNS
On 11-20 08:08, Andrew Hills wrote:
Would it be possible to disable requests made by the page to any
address outside the page's domain?
I do exactly this in Firefox with the RequestPolicy. It needs a little
whitelisting (like CDNs), but I really love it.
It doesn't really solve the ad
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:42:34PM +, Nick wrote:
What I meant is that privoxy will strip out e.g. img
src=badthing.png from the HTML it delivers to the browser, so the
browser will not request it. I think it does the same with scripts
etc.
So that makes more sense. It seems to have
so that i don't have to set it up on all my fucking pcs. for me
personally it was easier this way since I already have a dns server
anyway.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:37:09PM +0100, hiro wrote:
so that i don't have to set it up on all my fucking pcs. for me
personally it was easier this way since I already have a dns server
anyway.
sorry I didn't know you lived in a fucking computer lab
On 11-20 08:08, Andrew Hills wrote:
Would it be possible to disable requests made by the page to any
address outside the page's domain?
This is a worthwhile option for the browser.
It can block many ads, and also block cross-site request forgery exploits.
CSRF exploits take advantage of a
27 matches
Mail list logo
