> There shouldn’t be any reason for doing this
> manual hack, which is just a hack to work around a misdesign in
> fontconfig and xft.
I agree, this isn't the sort of thing that I'd like to see in the st
source, but for the poor souls suffering with a misbehaving
fontconfig, it might be a reasonab
Greetings.
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 06:43:57 +0100 "Galos, David"
wrote:
> > you know what sucks about this patch? there is no command line flag to
> > disable aa. whats up.
>
> It never occurred to me that anyone would want aa fonts. This patch
> just prevents FcFontMatch or its family from ever m
> you know what sucks about this patch? there is no command line flag to
> disable aa. whats up.
It never occurred to me that anyone would want aa fonts. This patch
just prevents FcFontMatch or its family from ever messing aa if it is
specified in the user pattern.
st-forcefully-respect-user-aa
you know what sucks about this patch? there is no command line flag to
disable aa. whats up.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Galos, David
wrote:
> I've attached a patch which forcefully prevents fonts from being antialiased.
>
> On some unfortunate configurations, simply adding "antialias=0" is
