On 2013-04-25 20:05, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> while trying to copy some stuff from iotop I came to the idea of having
> some ??halt?? function in st. This is like the ??halt?? in 9term, where ev???
> erything will stand still but the terminal is working on the output in
> the background.
Why
2013/4/25, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> Greetings.
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:15:37 +0200 Nimrod Omer
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Anyone has ever needed such a function and considers it worth to
>> > be
>> > added to s
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013, at 14:15, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Nice joke. Try to implement a scrollback buffer without bugs and flaw‐
> lessly.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Christoph Lohmann
The buffer's the easy part. What's hard is actually implementing
scrolling.
I've been tempted to hack in a way to
Greetings.
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:15:37 +0200 Nimrod Omer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> > Anyone has ever needed such a function and considers it worth to be
> > added to st?
> >
>
> Oh, I've needed such a function--but I've also ne
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Anyone has ever needed such a function and considers it worth to be
> added to st?
>
Oh, I've needed such a function--but I've also needed a scroll-back buffer.
Greetings comrades,
while trying to copy some stuff from iotop I came to the idea of having
some »halt« function in st. This is like the »halt« in 9term, where ev‐
erything will stand still but the terminal is working on the output in
the background.
Anyone has ever needed such a functio
Greetings.
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:58:17 +0200 Carlos Torres wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Alexander Sedov
> wrote:
> > Code should look compact to keep people from adding bloat. Multiple
> > files by themselves add nothing to understanding, other than need to
> > constantly switch c
2013/4/25 Roberto E. Vargas Caballero :
> When you want pass it any type of data? (of course, without using typeof)
Do you already want it?
Also, you can have multiple functions, as math.h does.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Alexander Sedov wrote:
> 2013/4/25 Kent Overstreet :
>> So, to restate - code should be harder to understand to keep people
>> from contributing?
> Code should look compact to keep people from adding bloat. Multiple
> files by themselves add nothing to understandin
[2013-04-25 14:27] Markus Teich
>
> I have just added the link to the "Related discussion" paragraph.
Thanks. That was exactly what I wanted (and not wanted to do myself).
meillo
I have just added the link to the "Related discussion" paragraph.
--Markus
Am 25.04.2013 13:40, schrieb Martti Kühne:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Raphaël Proust wrote:
[0]: http://www.wongdev.com/blog/2013/01/24/dwm-tags-are-not-workspaces/
I'd suggest you add only a link, that would
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Raphaël Proust wrote:
>>> [0]: http://www.wongdev.com/blog/2013/01/24/dwm-tags-are-not-workspaces/
I'd suggest you add only a link, that would honor the writer and his
blog most. ;-)
cheers!
mar77i
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:51 AM, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2013-04-23 20:34] Markus Teich
>>
>> [0]: http://www.wongdev.com/blog/2013/01/24/dwm-tags-are-not-workspaces/
>
> I like this text a lot. Please add it to the website.
I like it too.
If you want it added to the website, use http://suck
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:38:02PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2013-04-24 17:14] random...@fastmail.us
> >
> > A) Why do min and max need to be macros at all?
>
> That's the point, IMO. All the problems are introduced by performance
> optimizations that might not even necessary. If you write i
[2013-04-23 20:34] Markus Teich
>
> [0]: http://www.wongdev.com/blog/2013/01/24/dwm-tags-are-not-workspaces/
I like this text a lot. Please add it to the website.
meillo
[2013-04-24 17:14] random...@fastmail.us
>
> A) Why do min and max need to be macros at all?
That's the point, IMO. All the problems are introduced by performance
optimizations that might not even necessary. If you write it as a
function you simply don't need to care for double-evaluation. It wil
one liners -> one filers ?
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Alexander Sedov wrote:
> 2013/4/25 Kent Overstreet :
>> So, to restate - code should be harder to understand to keep people
>> from contributing?
> Code should look compact to keep people from adding bloat. Multiple
> files by themselves add nothing to understandi
18 matches
Mail list logo
