> The problem is the complexity of writing a replacement and all the
> compatibility layers needed to make it usable in the productive world.
The "window to a framebuffer" thing appeals to me because it would be simple,
performant, easy to implement, easy to code for, easy to port libs and
apps to
Greetings.
On Thu, 02 May 2013 06:06:33 +0200 Sam Watkins wrote:
> Is it unacceptable to dis X11 here? Although we may have to live with it
I don’t get how what was said and the topic can be used to come up with
such an implication.
> and write code for it, X11 is very far from suckless.
The
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:21:32AM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> For now all the monkeys are jumping on the wayland train.
I don't much like the smell of wayland, although it might be simpler /
better than X11.
Is it unacceptable to dis X11 here? Although we may have to live with it
and
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 05:43:30PM +0200, KarlOskar Rik?s wrote:
> By replying to his comment you make yourself not just an idiot in his eyes.
By mocking me and/or calling me an idiot, without offering any relevant
comment on my topic, you disgrace yourself exceedingly in my eyes!
but whatever, wh
By replying to his comment you make yourself not just an idiot in his eyes.
On May 1, 2013 3:42 PM, "Sam Watkins" wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:43:06AM +0200, hiro wrote:
> > You could try
> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/03/how-to-easily-skin-ubuntus-unity-desktop/first?
>
> I'm guessing
wtf, 20h.
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:43:06AM +0200, hiro wrote:
> You could try
> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/03/how-to-easily-skin-ubuntus-unity-desktop/
> first?
I'm guessing that you are mocking my idiocy? (in your eyes)
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Carlos Torres wrote:
> this doesn't have to be in dwm, i don't think it does anyway.
fine, if you want to recompile dwm for a function you might want to
use with other window managers of similar type. I guess a stand-alone
program would do. :)
cheers!
mar77i
I forgot to say: when you send a message to channel or user, it prints the
message in red.
So, you can easily notice when you started a private conversation.
Best Regards
--
H.Mo.
Hi,
I installed sic and it's a great tiny software. I love it.
Here a patch, which includes colors. You can easily tweak colors yourself.
Maybe, you don't need colors, but it helps a lot and I wanted to share it.
Here the colors:
Channel: bold magenta
Date: bold cyan
JOIN/QUIT/NOTICE messages: bo
On 2013-05-01, at 07:30, Sam Watkins wrote:
> I don't love X11, and I'm wondering if anyone has ported or made anything
> in the sprit of rio / 9wm to run on top of Linux framebuffer.
Port drawterm to run on fb rather than x11? Then you can run the actual plan 9
desktop by
connecting to a 9vx pr
In addition to what Carlos said about using damage evens and transparent
overlays, you probably want some sort of notification of activity in windows
not currently displayed on screen. This is similar to urgency wm hints, but
triggered by window content change rather than explicit application re
Hi 20h,
On 29 April 2013 18:34, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> on my news mailbox something interesting appeared [0]. Applying such a
> »display diff« to a dwm tag would be interesting, to only show the new
> difference from the last time it was switched to that tag. Making it a
Do I get this right, you want to port a plan9 GUI to linux framebuffer
for performance and low security? And then you want a potential X
compatibility layer on top of it? And you want to trust your
applications more? Do you think they feel bad if you don't trust them
enough?
You could try
http://
Greetings.
On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:21:32 +0200 Sam Watkins wrote:
> I don't love X11, and I'm wondering if anyone has ported or made anything
> in the sprit of rio / 9wm to run on top of Linux framebuffer. I realise
> rio relies on Plan 9 dynamic namespaces and such, but we might be able to
> do
15 matches
Mail list logo
