On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Lynx, while not being optimal, seems to decide to rather break the
> layout than do that. When I read “the web” it’s mostly information
> (as in: text) consumption, and for that, the layout is secondary.
This was the main reason behind my
markus schnalke dixit:
>you rather use w3m?
Is there anyone on earth having figured out how to *use* that,
as in navigate?
Fernando C.V. dixit:
>Also you can write rules for it that allow you to preprocess certain
>websites or handle some of them differently, like running external
>viewers for
I prefer w3m, because it reproduce vim keybindigs, si navigation is
easy.
The buffer system is also very useful.
--
,--.
: /` ) Xavier Cartron
| `-'http://yeuxdelibad.net
\_
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 05/28/13 at 03:43pm, v4hn wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:06:52PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> > these days, lynx was often mentioned when a text browser was meant.
> > Is there really someone (apart from mirabilos) who uses lynx?
>
I use elinks. I've never managed to get lynx to play we
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:06:52PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> these days, lynx was often mentioned when a text browser was meant.
> Is there really someone (apart from mirabilos) who uses lynx?
Yes, I routinely use it when looking for textual information:
wiki pages, software versions/package
On May 28, 2013 1:07 PM, "markus schnalke" wrote:
>
> Is there really someone (apart from mirabilos) who uses lynx?
I use lynx as my primary browser (and surf when lynx fails).
> Don't you rather use w3m?
w3m has some graphical capabilities, which makes it combine drawbacks of
both console and
* markus schnalke 2013-05-28 13:07
> these days, lynx was often mentioned when a text browser was meant.
> Is there really someone (apart from mirabilos) who uses lynx? Don't
> you rather use w3m?
me.
rarely intereactively, though. More with -dump. I do query dictionaries
or similar which happen
I use elinks.
It's not suckless, but it's the text browser that handles the web
better, from my experience.
Also you can write rules for it that allow you to preprocess certain
websites or handle some of them differently, like running external
viewers for images, using youtube-dl when you open you
I use lynx not infrequently. Sometimes to check that website work I
do is reasonable, and sometimes just because it is more restful.
w3m seems like a nicer idea, given that it appears to be built more
around the idea of a pager, but I never really learned how to
navigate in it properly.
A lot of
Hoi,
these days, lynx was often mentioned when a text browser was meant.
Is there really someone (apart from mirabilos) who uses lynx? Don't
you rather use w3m?
I am just wondering ...
meillo
Le 28-05-2013 06:21, Peter A. Shevtsov a écrit :
Greetings!
Hi
Is it just me or is there any problems with how WebKitGTK is built
from CRUX ports?
So, I build WebKitGTK from this Pkgfile[0] and surf[1] from this
one[2].
Did you try to compile WebKitGTK, without CRUX port?
--
H MoV.
11 matches
Mail list logo