dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
dash echo '\tshit'
shit
ash echo '\tshit'
\tshit
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Christian Neukirchen
chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Markus Teich markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de
pmarin pacog...@gmail.com writes:
dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
dash echo '\tshit'
shit
ash echo '\tshit'
\tshit
That is bad indeed. Know any other problems?
--
Christian Neukirchen
Quoth pmarin:
dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
Is it really broken? I got the impression from [0] that echo was so
badly specified that one shouldn't trust it to do much at all,
though I confess I haven't read
Chris Down dixit:
try mksh.
FWIW, mksh has three different “echo”; if invoked as mksh, it uses
a BSD echo by default which does interpret backslashes, but if one
uses set -o posix (or invokes it as sh or -sh and it is compiled
with -DMKSH_BINSHPOSIX (CVS HEAD)) it has an echo that only honours
Chris Down ch...@regentmarkets.com writes:
On 25 June 2013 18:01, Christian Neukirchen chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
pmarin pacog...@gmail.com writes:
dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
dash echo '\tshit'
What is your opinion on a shell for sbase?
The shell is a topic around which there is far too much religion.
Sbase should not include a shell.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Galos, David
galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
What is your opinion on a shell for sbase?
The shell is a topic around which there is far too much religion.
Sbase should not include a shell.
:) i like this answer
why not rc?
On 25 June 2013 10:10, Carlos Torres vlaadbr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Galos, David
galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
What is your opinion on a shell for sbase?
The shell is a topic around which there is far too much religion.
Sbase should not include
I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
that?
Jesse
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Calvin Morrison
mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
why not rc?
On 25 June 2013 10:10, Carlos Torres
On 25 June 2013 22:42, Jesse Ogle jesse.p.o...@gmail.com wrote:
I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
that?
GNU coreutils has no shell, it is packaged separately (as GNU bash).
On 25 June 2013 10:45, Chris Down ch...@chrisdown.name wrote:
On 25 June 2013 22:42, Jesse Ogle jesse.p.o...@gmail.com wrote:
I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
that?
GNU coreutils has no
Am 2013-06-25 16:42, schrieb Jesse Ogle:
I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
that?
I don't think „Everyone is doing it this way“ is a valid argument in
any discussion.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at
my votes are for at a minimum are for:
sponge
tee
pee
On 25 June 2013 10:54, Daniel Bryan danbr...@gmail.com wrote:
first of all, some things in moreutils would be awesome
Especially if they weren't written in Perl.
busybox ash.
Hi!
I wrote a sponge program, but I am not fully convinced of it yet. What
do you think?
Regards,
Jakob Kramer
commit 3565860b40ea4a8220d5029e3d74b437a9205cda
Author: Jakob Kramer jakob.kra...@gmx.de
Date: Tue Jun 25 19:55:37 2013 +0200
added sponge
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
so why keep it executable...
commit 8512381861878f2123a50a162a0d1ea550157da5
Author: Jakob Kramer jakob.kra...@gmx.de
Date: Tue Jun 25 20:10:39 2013 +0200
removed executable bits from chvt.c
diff --git a/chvt.c b/chvt.c
old mode 100755
new mode 100644
Isn't this just 'tee [file] /dev/null'?
On 25 June 2013 14:34, Galos, David galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
Isn't this just 'tee [file] /dev/null'?
No.
sponge sucks up stdin, waits till it is closed then puts it out to stdout
On 2013-06-25, at 20:39, Calvin Morrison wrote:
sponge sucks up stdin, waits till it is closed then puts it out to stdout
Except it does not actually sponge in the stdout case, only when writing to
file. Perhaps it would be better to drop support for stdout? Or cat temp
file to stdout at the
[2013-06-25 20:22] Jakob Kramer jakob.kra...@gmx.de
I wrote a sponge program, but I am not fully convinced of it yet. What
do you think?
I think you shouldn't rename(2). Renaming a file and replacing it's
contents are quite different things. Take for example:
$ mkdir a
$
Hello,
I wrote a patch to add a bar in dwm with a tab displayed for each window. It is
especially interesting in monocle mode, transforming this mode in a tab mode.
Navigating from window to window can be done by clicking on the window tabs or
using the usual Mod1-j/k keys. I am using this
Have you not heard of tabbed?
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:57:44 +0200 (CEST) philippe.g...@free.fr wrote:
If people are interested I can send the patch. Let me know if I
should post it directly to this mailing list.
You should post it to the wiki. That is the standard procedure for
sharing patches.
signature.asc
Description:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:00:27 -0400 Jacob Todd jaketodd...@gmail.com
wrote:
Have you not heard of tabbed?
Perhaps you should read his mail.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Thanks for your answer. I'll post it to the wiki,
Philippe.
- Mail original -
De: Andrew Hills ahi...@ednos.net
À: dev@suckless.org
Envoyé: Mardi 25 Juin 2013 22:00:06
Objet: Re: [dev] dwm: native window tabs
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:57:44 +0200 (CEST) philippe.g...@free.fr wrote:
If
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
my votes are for at a minimum are for:
sponge
tee
pee
And a cloth to clean up the mess...
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 08:24:08PM +0200, Jakob Kramer wrote:
so why keep it executable...
commit 8512381861878f2123a50a162a0d1ea550157da5
Author: Jakob Kramer jakob.kra...@gmx.de
Date: Tue Jun 25 20:10:39 2013 +0200
removed executable bits from chvt.c
diff --git a/chvt.c b/chvt.c
u...@netbeisser.de wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 08:24:08PM +0200, Jakob Kramer wrote:
so why keep it executable...
commit 8512381861878f2123a50a162a0d1ea550157da5
Author: Jakob Kramer jakob.kra...@gmx.de
Date: Tue Jun 25 20:10:39 2013 +0200
removed executable bits from chvt.c
diff
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:56:27PM +0200, Jakob Kramer wrote:
u...@netbeisser.de wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 08:24:08PM +0200, Jakob Kramer wrote:
so why keep it executable...
commit 8512381861878f2123a50a162a0d1ea550157da5
Author: Jakob Kramer jakob.kra...@gmx.de
Date: Tue Jun 25
Except it does not actually sponge in the stdout case, only when
writing to file. Perhaps it would be better to drop support for stdout?
Or cat temp file to stdout at the end? Why does it open a temp file
when not using it?
Definitely drop stdout support, its existence makes no sense.
To
On 25/06/2013, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com
wrote:
my votes are for at a minimum are for:
sponge
tee
pee
And a cloth to clean up the mess...
No, that's what sponge is for.
Hi, excuse me for the bad English... I created a simple gmail watcher
script/solution, because the gmail watcher extension to the Firefox no more
developed.
Gmail Watcher — without Firefox, from commandline!
Under Sabayon distro:
emerge fetchmail
To the $HOME/.fetchmailrc file:
poll
tcc can execute .c files
On Jun 26, 2013, at 0:43, u...@netbeisser.de wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:56:27PM +0200, Jakob Kramer wrote:
u...@netbeisser.de wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 08:24:08PM +0200, Jakob Kramer wrote:
so why keep it executable...
commit
33 matches
Mail list logo
