Re: [dev] lisp

2013-06-29 Thread Andrew Hills
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 17:11:42 -0400 Jacob Todd wrote: > how is that good news? that's horrible news. (That's the joke.) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] lisp

2013-06-29 Thread Jacob Todd
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > but there is good news for those who think c is bad: there are > emerging platforms which may give rise to different languages: > jvm on mobile and enterprise systems and the web with js.. > how is that good news? that's horrible news.

Re: [dev] lisp

2013-06-29 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
* Louis-Guillaume Gagnon [2013-06-29 13:35:58 -0400]: > It's worth noting that the R5RS scheme standard is only ~50 pages > long: http://www.schemers.org/Documents/Standards/R5RS/ > In comparison, the C99 standard is ~550 pages. I would say that the > scheme dialect is pretty simple. r5rs is muc

Re: [dev] lisp

2013-06-29 Thread Louis-Guillaume Gagnon
2013/6/29 Andrew Gwozdziewycz : > I don't speak for the suckless community, but despite the fact that I love > it, Lisp is complicated and not very simple at all It's worth noting that the R5RS scheme standard is only ~50 pages long: http://www.schemers.org/Documents/Standards/R5RS/ In comparison,

Re: [dev] video player and torrent client that don't suck

2013-06-29 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
Somebody claiming to be oneofthem wrote: You're really saying that cryptography hasn't changed since 2007? The algorithms that library implements certainly have not. -- Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma See for how I prefer to be contacted edition right joseph signature

Re: [dev] lisp

2013-06-29 Thread Craig Brozefsky
Andrew Gwozdziewycz writes: >I don't speak for the suckless community, but despite the fact that I >love it, Lisp is complicated and not very simple at all, which I'm >guessing is why you don't hear about it. I'm currently playing around >with attempting to make a minimal, embedda

Re: [dev] lisp

2013-06-29 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
I don't speak for the suckless community, but despite the fact that I love it, Lisp is complicated and not very simple at all, which I'm guessing is why you don't hear about it. I'm currently playing around with attempting to make a minimal, embeddable, unix friendly, without complications dialect,

[dev] lisp

2013-06-29 Thread oneofthem
is there any reason why lisp isn't mentioned much in the suckless community? considered irrelevant, harmful or what?

Re: [dev] daemon for DWM

2013-06-29 Thread Markus Wichmann
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 08:18:50AM +0300, Edgaras wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:01:52PM +0200, Markus Wichmann wrote: > > The function you are looking for is called asprintf(). > > Isn't asprintf just GNU extension? An IIRC such things a kinda mostly frown > upon here? Though it sure sounds