> I also see it a lot in scripts, along with using full options instead
> of short--perhaps to be more verbose? So, for compatibility, perhaps it
> is best to allow both.
If you mean GNU --long-options, then never in a million years :) If
you mean both dashed and non, that is likely what I will do.
Greetings.
In afgets() the size variable is never updated, which usually means it is always
zero, in which case it has no purpose at all. I believe it is supposed to be
updated on realloc? This way, calling afgets multiple times with the same
arguments will reuse the space if possible.
Also, the
>I would suggest a subset of POSIX tar options. It could be possibly
>amended with "z", "Z", "j" and "J" options, though using
>
>A $ tar c dirname | gzip -9c > filename.tar.gz
>
>or
>
>A $ tar cf - dirname | gzip -9c > filename.tar.gz
I usually use:
gunzip < fil
On 2013-07-06, at 12:15, David Galos wrote:
> In short, how do you fine folks invoke your tar?
My habit relays on compression scheme detection:
tar cf foo.txz ~/stuff
tar xf bar.tbz
-Truls
On Jul 6, 2013 5:04 PM, "Andrew Hills" wrote:
>
> So, for compatibility, perhaps it is best to allow both.
You mean the whole lot of GNU tar long options including filename rewriting
and masks? I don't see any way such implementation could fit "suckless"
principles.
I would suggest a subset of P
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 10:59:36 -0400 Alex Pilon wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 01:29:02PM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> > Apparently is there anybody who uses dashes in tar's keys?
>
> Yeah. Old habit.
I also see it a lot in scripts, along with using full options instead
of short--perhaps to b
On 2013-07-06 10:52, Adam Brand wrote:
> The problem ended up being that the Terminus font wasn't installed. Maybe a
> good add to the requirements for install (xfonts-terminus)?
There is no "requirements" file, what do you mean? If you are talking about
package dependencies, the package has nothi
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 01:29:02PM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> Apparently is there anybody who uses dashes in tar's keys?
Yeah. Old habit.
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 1:40 AM, sekret wrote:
> * Adam Brand [06.07.2013 01:12]:
> > It's only alt-shift-enter; if I do alt-p then run st (or lxterm or
> > whatever) things work fine.
>
> The question is: What's in your config.h for this key combination
> Alt-Shift-Enter?
>
>
Launching the termi
On 06/07/2013 8:30 PM, "Daniel Bryan" wrote:
>
> tar xzf filename.tar.gz ~/scratch/
Sorry, this should have been:
> tar xzf filename.tar.gz -C ~/scratch/
Apparently is there anybody who uses dashes in tar's keys?
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Also
$ tar cjf file.tar.bz2 folder
$ tar cJf file.tar.xz folder
and
$ tar xf filename.tar.
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 08:30:39PM +1000, Daniel Bryan wrote:
> tar xzf filename.tar.gz ~/scratch/
> On 06/07/2013 8:20 PM, "Dmitrij Czarkoff" wrote:
>
> > On Jul 6, 2013 12:16 PM, "Galos, David"
> > w
tar xzf filename.tar.gz ~/scratch/
On 06/07/2013 8:20 PM, "Dmitrij Czarkoff" wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2013 12:16 PM, "Galos, David"
> wrote:
> >
> > In short, how do you fine folks invoke your tar?
>
> $ tar czf filename.tar.gz foldername
> $ tar tzf filename.tar.gz
> $ tar xzf filename.tar.gz
>
> ---
On Jul 6, 2013 12:16 PM, "Galos, David" wrote:
>
> In short, how do you fine folks invoke your tar?
$ tar czf filename.tar.gz foldername
$ tar tzf filename.tar.gz
$ tar xzf filename.tar.gz
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
The attached patch shows my current work on adapting sltar
to sbase. It is functional, but, there are still open questions
regarding tar. The big deal is the argument parsing: I would
like to use the ARG macros in tar, but I'm not sure how that
fits with the average tar invocation.
In short, how
15 matches
Mail list logo
