I posted about Starch earlier [1]; to remind, it's static-linked
Arch-based Linux distro built against musl. The basic system now works
with a few small glitches. So far, packages for x86_64 are available.
http://starchlinux.org/
[1] http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1210/13050.html
Raphaël Proust dixit:
>On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Alexander S. wrote:
>> Uh, cannot this be achieved by piping output to tac?
>
>At which points someone asks why is there a sorted order at all in ls
>output… cannot this be achieved by piping output to sort?
Only if you pipe it through rs¹
Alexander S. wrote:
> If we want to retain this patch, I'd suggest reversing array after
> sorting, not multiplying by `sortorder' in comparison functions. This
> avoids code duplication.
Good suggestion. I will implement it tonight.
--Markus
Alexander S. wrote:
> Uh, cannot this be achieved by piping output to tac?
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> Yes, but tac it is no a standard posix tool, and sbase also hasn't it.
> I have an awk script in my machine for it:
Both solutions mean iterating over the list once more to reverse the
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:40:57PM +0100, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Alexander S. wrote:
> > Uh, cannot this be achieved by piping output to tac?
>
> At which points someone asks why is there a sorted order at all in ls
> output… cannot this be achieved by piping out
2013/10/4 Raphaël Proust :
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Alexander S. wrote:
>> Uh, cannot this be achieved by piping output to tac?
>
> At which points someone asks why is there a sorted order at all in ls
> output… cannot this be achieved by piping output to sort?
sort(1) can only sort by n
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Alexander S. wrote:
> Uh, cannot this be achieved by piping output to tac?
At which points someone asks why is there a sorted order at all in ls
output… cannot this be achieved by piping output to sort?
--
__
Raphaël Proust
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:32:23PM +0400, Alexander S. wrote:
> Uh, cannot this be achieved by piping output to tac?
Yes, but tac it is no a standard posix tool, and sbase also hasn't it.
I have an awk script in my machine for it:
#!/usr/bin/awk -f
{line[last++] = $0;}
END {
for (
Uh, cannot this be achieved by piping output to tac?
