2013/11/6, koneu :
> I agree with you on implicit "hi" and "bye" in mailing lists but please
> don't fucking bot quote. And if gmail's fucking online shit doesn't
> allow anything else then don't fucking use gmail's fucking online shit.
> Thanks.
+1 But can we write in less aggressive style withou
Mihail Zenkov wrote:
> 2013/11/6, koneu :
> > I agree with you on implicit "hi" and "bye" in mailing lists but please
> > don't fucking bot quote. And if gmail's fucking online shit doesn't
> > allow anything else then don't fucking use gmail's fucking online shit.
> > Thanks.
>
> +1 But can we wr
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:32:46 +0100
koneu wrote:
> Maybe suckless.org should host a netiquette mailing list to get all this
> off topic out of [dev] ...
>
ML-fragmentation has been discussed before (especially in regard to
stali) and dismissed.
For the sake of specificity though, I wouldn't have
2013/11/7 Szabolcs Nagy :
> * Alexander S. [2013-11-07 04:27:26 +0400]:
>> Seriously, simple parametric types wouldn't hurt C. Not at all. No
>> need for that automatic pointer conversion, additional parameters to
>> sort() and alike, and such. (I'm going to make a confession, I really
>> think C
"Asshole vs. reality" would be an appropriate subtitle for "suckless:
the movie".
Alas, the list smells ever of phosphorus and kerosene, as some would
rather flame than argue rationally. But slamming someone for an actual
fault, for example a bottom post, is no flame.
* Alexander S. [2013-11-07 16:55:35 +0400]:
> Context pointers for callbacks... well, they exist because of the
> limitations of the type system. I'd rather see
> ?A,[Types...].pthread_create(pthread_t*, A(*callback)(Types...), Types
> args...) (so, arbitrarily many additional args for callbacks).
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013, at 9:43, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> you don't have large file support,
The lack of large file support is entirely an artifact of the fact that
the "lseek" listed on that page uses an int instead of an off_t. The
existence of special APIs for large file support on e.g. Linux and
So
Why do I top post? yes i am lazy! After being with gmail since it was
in beta, I still don't have an option to god damned bottom-post by
default!!
On 7 November 2013 01:15, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> tldr
>
> On 11/6/13, Alexander Huemer wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:38:35PM +0100, A
hiro dixit:
>tldr
>
>On 11/6/13, Alexander Huemer wrote:
[…]
Can we please ban Googlemail from this mailing list?
(Funnily enough, recently I’ve started looking at From
headers more, and, sure enough, Googlemail users are
the biggest average idiots on other mailing lists as
well.)
bye,
//mirab
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013, at 11:42, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> Why do I top post? yes i am lazy! After being with gmail since it was
> in beta, I still don't have an option to god damned bottom-post by
> default!!
Top posting or bottom posting isn't an "option", it's determined by
_where you click the mo
Thorsten Glaser said:
> Can we please ban Googlemail from this mailing list?
Obviously I'm against this.
> (Funnily enough, recently I’ve started looking at From
> headers more, and, sure enough, Googlemail users are
> the biggest average idiots on other mailing lists as
> well.)
Thanks.
--
D
On 7 November 2013 11:45, wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013, at 11:42, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> Why do I top post? yes i am lazy! After being with gmail since it was
>> in beta, I still don't have an option to god damned bottom-post by
>> default!!
>
> Top posting or bottom posting isn't an "option",
Calvin Morrison said:
> Why do I top post? yes i am lazy! After being with gmail since it was
> in beta, I still don't have an option to god damned bottom-post by
> default!!
Then go and get any of the scripts to enable it. Or just install MUA.
Top-posting since Gmail beta has nothing to do with
random...@fastmail.us said:
> Top posting or bottom posting isn't an "option", it's determined by
> _where you click the mouse_. You're not supposed to just start typing
> where the cursor drops, you're supposed to edit out the bits of the
> quote that you're not replying to.
You probably didn't u
> You probably didn't use Gmail for a while - they now collapse quotes,
> and AFAIR don't allow typing below them.
>
You can type below, it's just a PiTA
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Thorsten Glaser said:
>> Can we please ban Googlemail from this mailing list?
>
> Obviously I'm against this.
>
Yeah, I'm against it too :)
--Carlos
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:10:49PM -0500, Carlos Torres wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
> wrote:
> > Thorsten Glaser said:
> >> Can we please ban Googlemail from this mailing list?
> >
> > Obviously I'm against this.
> >
>
> Yeah, I'm against it too :)
We didn't as
On 7 November 2013 12:12, sin wrote:
>> >
>>
>> Yeah, I'm against it too :)
>
> We didn't ask you.
Go die.
Thanks,
Calvin
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:13:33PM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 7 November 2013 12:12, sin wrote:
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yeah, I'm against it too :)
> >
> > We didn't ask you.
>
> Go die.
They don't have gmail in death.
> You can type below, it's just a PiTA
Not possible on the JavaScriptless web client.
On 07/11/2013, Ryan O’Hara wrote:
>> You can type below, it's just a PiTA
>
> Not possible on the JavaScriptless web client.
>
>
Yes it is, click "more reply options"
2013/11/7 Szabolcs Nagy :
> * Alexander S. [2013-11-07 16:55:35 +0400]:
>> Context pointers for callbacks... well, they exist because of the
>> limitations of the type system. I'd rather see
>> ?A,[Types...].pthread_create(pthread_t*, A(*callback)(Types...), Types
>> args...) (so, arbitrarily many
* Alexander S. [2013-11-08 02:10:49 +0400]:
> 2013/11/7 Szabolcs Nagy :
> > with a single pointer arg this assumes that all pointers have
> > the same representation or that you create a separate version
> > of pthread_create for every type used
> Pthread_create doesn't need to know anything about
2013/11/8 Szabolcs Nagy :
> * Alexander S. [2013-11-08 02:10:49 +0400]:
>> 2013/11/7 Szabolcs Nagy :
>> > with a single pointer arg this assumes that all pointers have
>> > the same representation or that you create a separate version
>> > of pthread_create for every type used
>> Pthread_create do
It is now safe to turn off this mailing list.
25 matches
Mail list logo
