What about using pgf/tikz?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Charlie Murphy cmsmur...@gmail.com wrote:
Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
Unfortunately, the C toolkits over there are turning very bad:
GTK+ and the EFL do depend on harfbuzz for their font layout
computation which is an *really* ugly c++
* Džen 2014-06-23 11:14
What about using pgf/tikz?
do you mean as backend or as fileformat/syntax?
tikz is quite powerful but I wouldn't call it simple.
--s_
Markus Teich dixit:
[0] http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/software/tiny/teensy.html
Great read, thanks!
- Alex
* Džen 2014-06-23 13:09
As a back-end and syntax.
TikZ actually is quite simple.
The syntax is simple for simple things, true.
But then you need to through it to pgf and tex and whether they as
dependences make much sense…
A lot of people find it difficult to use, but practice makes
Hej Guys,
Some 5-7 years ago, we coded a lightweight vector graphic soft that
was based on Xlib. It used some key bindings of Adobe Illustrator, but
it was really too basic for anything.
We are coding a new one which is based on SDL, but project dvlpt is really slow.
Whatsoever I can use those
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:50 PM, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
But then you need to through it to pgf and tex and whether they as
dependences make much sense…
Indeed, that's a messy overhead.
I have used it several times for different purposes but not so often.
Every time I get back to it,
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:32:09 +0200
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero k...@shike2.com wrote:
For me it is ok to, but I think we are losing the point here. Why st has a
macro called CEIL instead of using ceil?, because it is used only with
integers, and in this case is faster use CEIL instead of
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:13:36 +0200
Džen yvl...@gmail.com wrote:
What about using pgf/tikz?
What about not top-posting?
--
FRIGN d...@frign.de
I think the code is probably horrendous, but I kind of like xfig, it has
a kind of brutal simplicity, but it can still handle complex drawings well.
Incidentally, I've used it to export postscript that was then templated
using the {{tags}} entered in xfig directly
cheers
aes
Oh, I guess the mailing list manager swallowed the subscribe message
---
Hello
The render- patches are independent of each other, but depend on the
first reorder-and-extend.
Move default-rows-cols to config is completely independent, and makes
sense on its own.
The fast-blink support involves
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:16:40 +0200
Anders Eurenius a...@spotify.com wrote:
Hey Anders,
impressive patch. I see that it probably has taken some time to write.
The fast-blink support involves a bit of mucking about in the main
loop, and is a bit more debatable. I'm not entirely happy with it,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 3:28 PM, grayfox gray...@outerhaven.de wrote:
Hey,
i used Arch for some years but changed to Gentoo this week. It's not
really BSD-equivalent by default but with some time you can do
everything you want very easily. Moreover I like the USE-flag concept
to compile just
void did a move to runit, which is pretty minimal compared to any other init
alternative
www.voidlinux.eu
On 23 Jun 2014, at 15:44, Andrew Gwozdziewycz w...@apgwoz.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 3:28 PM, grayfox gray...@outerhaven.de wrote:
Hey,
i used Arch for some years but changed
Hey Anders,
impressive patch. I see that it probably has taken some time to write.
Well, it was a lazy sunday afternoon, nothing serious.
The fast-blink support involves a bit of mucking about in the main
loop, and is a bit more debatable. I'm not entirely happy with it, but
it does
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:02:01 +0200
Anders Eurenius a...@spotify.com wrote:
Also, don't confuse low LOC count with simplicity. Splitting the main loop
has merit even without either fastblink or blink.
I'll take a closer look at what you did with the main loop and let you
know what I think.
In
This patch clarifies in the man page that the default key binding
Mod1-Shift-[1..n] removes the other tags from the focused window in
addition to adding the nth tag. May not be worth applying but this did
cause a bit of confusion for me.
Calebdiff --git a/dwm.1 b/dwm.1
index 6687011..29cf319
Hello everybody,
reading run(), I noticed gettimeofday() is being used to measure
time-differences.
This is not good practice[0], given gettimeofday is inaccurate for this
matter (take time-jumps for instance). POSIX.1-2008 even marks it as
obsolete!
This patch will move the entire timing-system
On 23/06/2014, Andrew Gwozdziewycz w...@apgwoz.com wrote:
Arch is pretty good, has great documentation and is quite lightweight.
I must complain about the use of systemd, which is, in my opinion, not
very suckless at all. No other complaints though.
Beware: Arch now deletes all static
I think removing static libraries for packages does not go against The
Arch Way, but rather contributes towards technical simplicity.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/The_Arch_Way
---
Alexander Rødseth / xyproto
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:17:58 +0200
Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
I think removing static libraries for packages does not go against The
Arch Way, but rather contributes towards technical simplicity.
Read this[0], this[1] and this[2]. Then you'll know The Arch Way(R)
leads straight
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 05:23:02PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
[0]: http://sta.li/faq
[1]: http://dl.suckless.org/stali/clt2010/stali.html
[2]: http://www.catonmat.net/blog/ldd-arbitrary-code-execution/
BTW, regarding a static linux kernel for desktops:
- was including as built-ins *all* desktop
Hey Markus,
On 6/21/14, Markus Teich markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de wrote:
tabbed.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
...
diff --git a/tabbed.c b/tabbed.c
index ba22f9a..cbdaa1f 100644
--- a/tabbed.c
+++ b/tabbed.c
good thing your text mentioned tabbed, though i think subjects and
22 matches
Mail list logo
