Since we are creating a utmp entry, it is logical to create a login
shell
---
utmp.c | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utmp.c b/utmp.c
index f551f9d..75c35f5 100644
--- a/utmp.c
+++ b/utmp.c
@@ -38,8 +38,10 @@ int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
It is idiomatic the use of the simple pw instead of pass for
variables of type struct pass.
---
bsd.c | 8
posix.c | 8
utmp.c | 14 +++---
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsd.c b/bsd.c
index cb455a2..754d1d0 100644
--- a/bsd.c
+++ b/
This part of the code is identicall to the code of st, and st does
better tests that utmp was doing, so we take the code of st.
---
utmp.c | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utmp.c b/utmp.c
index bda11d3..f551f9d 100644
--- a/utmp.c
+++ b/utmp.c
@@ -46,9
On 15/09/2014, Maxime Coste wrote:
> And for C++, well, I know there is some vocal individuals against it on the
> sl mailing list, but I think most members are sensible, we do not need to
> stay frozen with C89, C++ is bigger than C, more complex, but provides a lot
> of abstraction features that
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:12:58 +0100
Maxime Coste wrote:
> Hard to resist talking about a project I spent most of my spare coding time
> on for the last 3 years.
Fair point.
> I agree 18000 is not small, but not that big either, clearly reasonable
> for the amount of things Kakoune does (and nope
Hi
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:50:52PM +0300, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
> On September 15, 2014 6:41:29 PM EEST, q...@c9x.me wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:21:25PM +0100, Maxime Coste wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> [...]
> >> Maxime Coste.
> >
> >I like your advertisement man, keep it up :).
> >I also
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:02:19PM -0400, Lee Fallat wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>> >> I want to code a text editor that is suckless and actually matters. If
>> >> your implementation is bette
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:02:19PM -0400, Lee Fallat wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> >> I want to code a text editor that is suckless and actually matters. If
> >> your implementation is better, we better code for your project.
> >
> > FWIW, the only reason
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>> I want to code a text editor that is suckless and actually matters. If your
>> implementation is better, we better code for your project.
>
> FWIW, the only reason I liked sandy was because it was not yet another
> vi clone.
>
> A nic
> I want to code a text editor that is suckless and actually matters. If your
> implementation is better, we better code for your project.
FWIW, the only reason I liked sandy was because it was not yet another
vi clone.
A nice experimental and in-development editor is edit[0]
[0] http://c9x.me/
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:37:31PM +0300, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
> I'm not telling it "in a bad way", but your project seems (from the
comments, I haven't tried it yet) very promising and more worth coding than
sandy.
> Is that right? (question to sandy users too).
> I want to code a text editor
>I don't think so, try to edit something like this:
>
> コンニチハ
>
>or this:
>
> printf "Hello\0World" > TEST && sandy TEST
>
>or this (not recommended):
>
> seq 1000 > TEST && sandy TEST
>
>Last time I looked the vim bindings weren't that powerful, for example
>text object are not supported? As a
On September 15, 2014 6:41:29 PM EEST, q...@c9x.me wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:21:25PM +0100, Maxime Coste wrote:
>> Hello,
>> [...]
>> Maxime Coste.
>
>I like your advertisement man, keep it up :).
>I also like advocating for change rather than
>flavorless copy.
>
>- Q.
Yes, I agree.
I also
On 9/15/14, 3:03 PM, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> This is true to some degree. The problem is that most people are already
> familiar with vi(m) (myself included). Therefore the hope is that by sticking
> to the vim conventions more contributors will be attracted. As for my personal
> needs they are
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:21:25PM +0100, Maxime Coste wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here are a few thought on your design, based on my own experience with
> Kakoune.
Thanks for sharing them! Kakoune looks interesting. At some later point
I will take a closer look.
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 04:01:15PM +
Thanks Marc,
I still have much to learn, but I already love vis.
Regards,
Claudio
2014-09-15 17:06 GMT+00:00 Amadeus Folego :
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:52:07PM +0200, Marc André Tanner wrote:
>> Hi Caudio,
>>
>> Thanks, will incorporate your requested functionality.
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 14, 201
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:49:09AM +0300, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
> On September 13, 2014 5:01:15 PM EEST, "Marc André Tanner"
> wrote:
> >TLDR: I'm writing an experimental but (hopefully) highly efficient vim
> >like text editor based on a piece chain data structure. You will find
> >an url to a
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:52:07PM +0200, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> Hi Caudio,
>
> Thanks, will incorporate your requested functionality.
>
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 06:25:30PM +0200, Claudio wrote:
> > @@ -93,8 +93,10 @@ static KeyBinding basic_movement[] = {
> > { { KEY(SRIGHT)
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:02:30PM -0500, M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> On 13/09/2014, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> > The default interface is a vim clone called vis.
>
> Name clash on BSD [1][2][3]
This is somewhat unfortunate but the opportunity was too good
not to make a reference to vis[0] (due to th
Hi Caudio,
Thanks, will incorporate your requested functionality.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 06:25:30PM +0200, Claudio wrote:
> @@ -93,8 +93,10 @@ static KeyBinding basic_movement[] = {
> { { KEY(SRIGHT) }, movement, { .i = MOVE_WORD_START_NEXT
> } },
> { { KEY(UP)
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:21:25PM +0100, Maxime Coste wrote:
> Hello,
> [...]
> Maxime Coste.
I like your advertisement man, keep it up :).
I also like advocating for change rather than
flavorless copy.
- Q.
Marc André Tanner said:
> Editor Frontends
>
>
> The editor core is written in a library like fashion which should make
> it possible to write multiple frontends with possibly different user
> interfaces/paradigms.
>
> At the moment there exists a barely functional, non-modal n
Hello,
Here are a few thought on your design, based on my own experience with Kakoune.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> Text management using a piece table/chain
> =
>
> [...]
While this looks like a nice data structure
Dimitris Zervas on Mon, 2014/09/15 10:49:
> On September 13, 2014 5:01:15 PM EEST, "Marc André Tanner"
> wrote:
> >TLDR: I'm writing an experimental but (hopefully) highly efficient vim
> >like text editor based on a piece chain data structure. You will find
> >an url to a git repository at the
On September 13, 2014 5:01:15 PM EEST, "Marc André Tanner"
wrote:
>TLDR: I'm writing an experimental but (hopefully) highly efficient vim
>like text editor based on a piece chain data structure. You will find
>an url to a git repository at the end of this rather long mail.
Take a look at sandy [
25 matches
Mail list logo
