Apologies, I need a better mail client.
On 17 September 2014 07:39, Ralph Eastwood wrote:
> Maxime Coste wrote:
>> That last one is by far the most interesting, Bartos being very familliar
>> with
>> C++. Note that its not C that is advocated, but haskell...
>
> I would advocate functional langu
Maxime Coste wrote:
> That last one is by far the most interesting, Bartos being very familliar with
> C++. Note that its not C that is advocated, but haskell...
I would advocate functional languages (not necessarily Haskell) over C++ any day
- although implementations of functional languages hav
Maxime Coste wrote:
> That is the complaint I mostly hear about Go, the lack of Generic. That and
> garbage collection.
Why would I want to apply the same algorithm to semantically different
arguments? Appart from different kinds of number representations no useful
example comes to mind.
--Markus
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
> I have been for the last several weeks (months) researching what language I
> want to use to implement a couple of apps I want to do.
What kind of apps are you planning to write?
> So I have this internal debate in me as to whether or not to learn C and/or
> C++. One one h
Greetings.
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:29:01 +0200 Maxime Coste wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:02:40PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > This is programming and not your playground. Avoid fancy code.
>
> I guess that is a matter of taste, I just know m1 + m2 calls
> operator+(Matrix, Matrix).
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:37:44AM -0700, Markus Teich wrote:
> M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> > [1] http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/linus
> > [2] http://gigamonkeys.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/coders-c-plus-plus/
>
> Heyho,
>
> also relevant for the (non-)topic:
> http://bartoszmilewski.com/2013/09/1
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:02:40PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > Ok, so what exactly is the sum of 3 lines and 2 bytes ? The whole point
> > is to catch at compilation code that is logically invalid, if you have
> > f(ByteCount, LineCount), you cannot call it with a (LineCount, ByteCount)
> >
Fixed typo breaking + functionality in tail:
diff --git a/tail.c b/tail.c
index 59e68ca..87a08b9 100644
--- a/tail.c
+++ b/tail.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ dropinit(FILE *fp, const char *str, long n)
ssize_t len;
unsigned long i = 0;
- while(i < n && ((len = agetline(&buf, &size, fp)
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:20:45PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> > Ok, so what exactly is the sum of 3 lines and 2 bytes ? The whole point
> > is to catch at compilation code that is logically invalid, if you have
> > f(ByteCount, LineCount), you cannot call it with a (LineCount, Byte
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:25:02 -0500
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
Hey Jimmie,
> Seeing how much C++ people complain about the C like stuff or the actual
> C stuff in C++. Why don't they just grow a pair and clean out all the
> stuff they complain about. Simplify the language and get on with it. As
> i
On 09/16/2014 02:37 AM, Markus Teich wrote:
M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
[1] http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/linus
[2] http://gigamonkeys.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/coders-c-plus-plus/
Heyho,
also relevant for the (non-)topic:
http://bartoszmilewski.com/2013/09/19/edward-chands/
--Markus
Thank
> No. Because the realloc that you have to do maybe has to move in the
> worst case n-1 elements in a new memory arena. So you have n (moving
> to the position) * n-1 (memcpy to new position in memory) = n^2. You
> can decrease the possibility of reallocation allocating
> more memory of needed, but
> Ok, so what exactly is the sum of 3 lines and 2 bytes ? The whole point
> is to catch at compilation code that is logically invalid, if you have
> f(ByteCount, LineCount), you cannot call it with a (LineCount, ByteCount)
> signature. In C you would be forced to use f(int, int), and long debugging
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:02:40 +0200
Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> No, civilisation ended when »C++« was mentioned. Code abstraction and
> bad design choices made from idiots relying on OOP are the reason why
> your local Windows machine is so slow in loading drivers, opening Wi
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:30:47 +0100
Maxime Coste wrote:
> Ok, so what exactly is the sum of 3 lines and 2 bytes ? The whole point
> is to catch at compilation code that is logically invalid, if you have
> f(ByteCount, LineCount), you cannot call it with a (LineCount, ByteCount)
> signature. In C y
Greetings.
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:02:40 +0200 Maxime Coste wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:02:54PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> > > Well, I still rely a lot on having a proper type system to do checks at
> > > compile time. For example I have separate types for line counts, byt
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:02:54PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> > Well, I still rely a lot on having a proper type system to do checks at
> > compile time. For example I have separate types for line counts, byte
>
> Proper..., good word for saying a pain in the ass. One of the best
> Well, I still rely a lot on having a proper type system to do checks at
> compile time. For example I have separate types for line counts, byte
Proper..., good word for saying a pain in the ass. One of the best thing
of C (and C++ because they share this part) is automatic conversions
that remov
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:13:00AM +0100, Ralph Eastwood wrote:
> Maxime, I really like what you'e done with kakoune, although your code
> base doesn't
> seem to use C++'s features heavily, meaning that your could write
> equally clean code in C.
> Why does it have to be C89? C99 is nicer.
>
>
>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:31:05AM -0400, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote:
> I do think it would be nice if this line were in config.mk, as
> it seems to be system-specific.
I agree, will do.
--
Marc André Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: CF7D56C0
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:56:14PM +0200, Gregor Best wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've got two patches and three questions:
>
> First, the patches. The first fixes editing of length 0 files,
Thanks applied with some cosmetic changes. I'm not sure the perror call makes
that much sense and since the oth
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:55:40PM +0200, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> I have cleaned up the cursor handling code in window.[ch] and implemented
> the CTRL-{U,D,E,Y} functionality in normal mode. However I'm not sure it
> behaves the way you expect it. Please test, and report back.
CTRL-{U,D} is wor
> This was the first thing I missed when I tried, thanks for pulling it!
I have cleaned up the cursor handling code in window.[ch] and implemented
the CTRL-{U,D,E,Y} functionality in normal mode. However I'm not sure it
behaves the way you expect it. Please test, and report back.
Thanks
--
Mar
Quoth Claudio on Tue, Sep 16 2014 10:03 +0200:
I've just installed dvtm on Ubuntu Server and it looks like
the terminfo entry gets installed into the wrong place
(/usr/share/terminfo/, while the system looks for it in
/etc/terminfo/). So I just removed the -o flag from @tic which
allow the system
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:19 PM, M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> On 16/09/2014, Raphaël Proust wrote:
>> I am planning on making a filter for the sam language. I.e. something
>> like sed but that would accept sam expressions.
>
> http://swtch.com/plan9port/man/man1/ssam.html
Thanks, I didn't know about
Hi guys,
I've got two patches and three questions:
First, the patches. The first fixes editing of length 0 files, the second fixes
compilation on OpenBSD. Since _BSD_SOURCE was already present in other files
belonging to vis, I figured adding it to vis.c as well poses no harm.
The first question
On 16/09/2014, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> I am planning on making a filter for the sam language. I.e. something
> like sed but that would accept sam expressions.
http://swtch.com/plan9port/man/man1/ssam.html
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> A nice experimental and in-development editor is edit[0]
Really nice!
I am planning on making a filter for the sam language. I.e. something
like sed but that would accept sam expressions. That would make a
search and replace trivial
On 16 September 2014 00:23, FRIGN wrote:
>
> Some vocal individuals? I struggle to find anybody who isn't against C++.
> C++ does provide some abstraction features, yes, but every time I read
> C++ or even boost-code, my brain just shuts off and begs for C's
> simplicity and clarity.
In my opinio
Hi,
I've just installed dvtm on Ubuntu Server and it looks like the
terminfo entry gets installed into the wrong place
(/usr/share/terminfo/, while the system looks for it in
/etc/terminfo/). So I just removed the -o flag from @tic which allow
the system to place the files to the right directory.
M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> [1] http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/linus
> [2] http://gigamonkeys.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/coders-c-plus-plus/
Heyho,
also relevant for the (non-)topic:
http://bartoszmilewski.com/2013/09/19/edward-chands/
--Markus
31 matches
Mail list logo
