Hi,
* Troy Sankey [2015-01-29 04:12]:
> On 2015-01-28 14:44:52 -0500, Nico Golde wrote:
> > What I think may be better would be to only set nick after a successful
> > NICK
> > message was received from the network as Truls suggests.
> > Would you mind testing the attached patch?
>
> Tested, wo
Greetings.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:28:12 +0100 Matthew of Boswell
wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:26:28 +0100
> Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> > I consider e‐mail to be more suckless than the web, that’s why I’d
> > pro‐ pose a mail solution.
>
> I don't think that I'd want paste
El Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:28:12 +0100, Christoph Lohmann escribió:
> Two different views on how to communicate clash here:
>
> 1.) The web view is to have some URI and it's always available.
> 2.) The mail view of having your private mailbox you take care of.
>
>
3) Have a distributed or federated
My response is a bit long, but I think the idea deserves some good
discussion.
On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:28:12 +0100
Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> > I don't think that I'd want pastebin to email me with everyone's
> > paste; my hard drive would fill up so fast I'd have to quit email.