Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 15:25:05 +0100 Jakub Lach wrote: Hey Jakub, > I'm grateful for maintaining this software, however my upgrade from 6.0->1 > brought me nothing but grumpiness unfortunately. > It has xft that I don't want, my terminus font doesn't work (or I haven't

Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

Dnia 7 grudnia 2015 16:16 FRIGN napisał(a): > ... Yeah, thanks. I'm aware of differences, I've rewrote config.h, I've anticipated such response and I'm (partially) okay with it. I've reverted to 6.0 too. What I'm trying to say, is that 6.1 is a little more POLA violating, than

Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

Dnia 9 listopada 2015 0:45 Hiltjo Posthuma napisał(a): > After a long time (dwm 6.0 was released on 2011-12-19) it is time for a new > dwm release. I'm grateful for maintaining this software, however my upgrade from 6.0->1 brought me nothing but grumpiness

Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:10 +0100 "G.H." wrote: > I also have problems with 6.1; it won't compile because of a lack of xft > fonts on my machine, or, I think that's my problem. Huh? What OS/distro are you guys using that you don't already have libxft? I have so many

Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

I also have problems with 6.1; it won't compile because of a lack of xft fonts on my machine, or, I think that's my problem. I appreciate that DWM is a developer's tool and, in using it I should have sufficient knowledge to address this issue, but.. I do like DWM and I'd would like to

Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

Hello, For xft Terminus, I simply use "Terminus:bold:size=9", that seems to work best, you should check "fc-list | grep Terminus" to see if Terminus is in fontconfig fontpath (or whatever its called) or else add it, like so "xset +fp ~/.fonts/terminus" or where ever you have yours, with .xinitrc

Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:51:55 +0100 Jakub Lach wrote: > [...]than dwm releases used to be. I'm curious now... how long have you been using dwm? The last release before this was in 2011. -- Matt Boswell

Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

On 7 December 2015 at 15:51, Jakub Lach wrote: > What I'm trying to say, is that 6.1 is a little more > POLA violating, than dwm releases used to be. I do think it a little unfortunate that dwm release numbering means essentially nothing. The jump from 6.0 to 6.1 was far

Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

Dnia 7 grudnia 2015 17:15 Matthew of Boswell napisał(a): > On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:51:55 +0100 > Jakub Lach wrote: > > [...]than dwm releases used to be. > > I'm curious now... how long have you been using dwm? The last release >

Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Jakub Lach wrote: > It has xft that I don't want, my terminus font doesn't work (or I haven't > figured the syntax), had to rewrite config.h Your terminus font settings might not work out-of-the-box, but now everyone that wants to use dwm with languages