Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Ben Woolley
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 23, 2015, at 1:03 PM, mpu wrote: > > quen...@c9x.me (mpu) wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I wrote some tools to design bitmap fonts. Maybe you'll >> be interested. >> >> http://github.com/mpu/fnt/ > > I feel bad that this whole discussion ended up being about > lega

[dev] Z-ordering in dwm based on size

2015-12-23 Thread Eric Pruitt
When using dwm, I sometimes "lose" windows in floating mode because they're hidden behind another window. I am thinking about writing a patch that adjusts the z-order of windows based on the size of the windows relative to one another to prevent this. Is anyone sitting on patch that already does th

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Mattias Andrée
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 23:08:37 +0100 FRIGN wrote: > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:59:08 -0200 > Marcel Rodrigues wrote: > > > Genuine question: does anyone know of any actual > > instance where some code released as "public domain" > > caused trouble for citizens (from whatever country) who > > copied i

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Mattias Andrée
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:04:12 + Ammar James wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:06:35PM +0100, Mattias Andrée > wrote: > > Sorry, it would be a douche move in rank with > > patenting maths, and then enforce it. > > > > Algorithms can be patented in the US. I know. Other elements of maths

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Ammar James
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 05:04:11PM +, Ammar James wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:06:35PM +0100, Mattias Andrée wrote: > > Sorry, it would be a douche move in rank with > > patenting maths, and then enforce it. > > > > Algorithms can be patented in the US. > > PageRank is a good example

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Ammar James
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:06:35PM +0100, Mattias Andrée wrote: > Sorry, it would be a douche move in rank with > patenting maths, and then enforce it. > Algorithms can be patented in the US. PageRank is a good example: https://www.google.com/patents/US628 Best, Ammar. > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread FRIGN
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:59:08 -0200 Marcel Rodrigues wrote: > Genuine question: does anyone know of any actual instance where some > code released as "public domain" caused trouble for citizens (from > whatever country) who copied it? I actually knew somebody who got into trouble because he didn'

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Mattias Andrée
Sorry, it would be a douche move in rank with patenting maths, and then enforce it. On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 23:05:01 +0100 Mattias Andrée wrote: > Probably not. It would be a douche move in rank with > patent trolling, and you would probably be less like > to win. More likely is that people make pro

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Mattias Andrée
Probably not. It would be a douche move in rank with patent trolling, and you would probably be less like to win. More likely is that people make proprietary forks and do not release the source code. On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:59:08 -0200 Marcel Rodrigues wrote: > Genuine question: does anyone know

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Marcel Rodrigues
Genuine question: does anyone know of any actual instance where some code released as "public domain" caused trouble for citizens (from whatever country) who copied it? 2015-12-23 19:51 GMT-02:00 Marcel Rodrigues : > Genuine question: does anyone know of any actual instance where some code > relea

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Mattias Andrée
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 21:03:11 + mpu wrote: > quen...@c9x.me (mpu) wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I wrote some tools to design bitmap fonts. Maybe you'll > > be interested. > > > > http://github.com/mpu/fnt/ > > I feel bad that this whole discussion ended up being about > legal matters. Be

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread mpu
quen...@c9x.me (mpu) wrote: > Hi folks, > > I wrote some tools to design bitmap fonts. Maybe you'll > be interested. > > http://github.com/mpu/fnt/ I feel bad that this whole discussion ended up being about legal matters. Because some people seem unable to simply copy-paste 200 lines of code w

Re: [dev] Re: Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Mattias Andrée
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:49:15 -0800 Louis Santillan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Mattias Andrée > wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:06:12 +0100 > > Christian Neukirchen wrote: > > > >> quen...@c9x.me (mpu) writes: > >> > >> > Ben Woolley wrote: > >> >> What licenses are the t

Re: [dev] Re: Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Louis Santillan
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Mattias Andrée wrote: > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:06:12 +0100 > Christian Neukirchen wrote: > >> quen...@c9x.me (mpu) writes: >> >> > Ben Woolley wrote: >> >> What licenses are the tools and the font? There doesn't >> >> seem to be a copyright statement or license a

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Greg Reagle
On 12/23/2015 09:54 AM, Mattias Andrée wrote: > I would argue you not to use public domain because > of its legal status. In most non-English speaking > countries you cannot release something as public > domain. I agree. I suggest a simple permissive license such as the one used for X11 [1] or E

Re: [dev] Re: Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Mattias Andrée
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:06:12 +0100 Christian Neukirchen wrote: > quen...@c9x.me (mpu) writes: > > > Ben Woolley wrote: > >> What licenses are the tools and the font? There doesn't > >> seem to be a copyright statement or license anywhere. > >> Maybe > >>I am missing something obvious... > >

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Mattias Andrée
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:01:30 +0100 FRIGN wrote: > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:54:17 +0100 > Mattias Andrée wrote: > > > I would argue you not to use public domain because > > of its legal status. In most non-English speaking > > countries you cannot release something as public > > domain. This means

[dev] Re: Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Christian Neukirchen
quen...@c9x.me (mpu) writes: > Ben Woolley wrote: >> What licenses are the tools and the font? There doesn't >> seem to be a copyright statement or license anywhere. Maybe >>I am missing something obvious... > > The license and the font are now public domain, maybe I'll > put a BSD license on the

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread FRIGN
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:54:17 +0100 Mattias Andrée wrote: > I would argue you not to use public domain because > of its legal status. In most non-English speaking > countries you cannot release something as public > domain. This means that contributors from such > countries cannot contribute code

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread Mattias Andrée
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:59:37 + mpu wrote: > Ben Woolley wrote: > > What licenses are the tools and the font? There doesn't > > seem to be a copyright statement or license anywhere. > > Maybe > >I am missing something obvious... > > The license and the font are now public domain, maybe I'l

Re: [dev] Font edition tooling

2015-12-23 Thread mpu
Ben Woolley wrote: > What licenses are the tools and the font? There doesn't > seem to be a copyright statement or license anywhere. Maybe >I am missing something obvious... The license and the font are now public domain, maybe I'll put a BSD license on the font some day, when I judge the quality