On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:59:40AM +0300, Amer wrote:
> I don't understand at all how you can apply this embedded-into-body
> patch with all tabs replaced by spaces and lines wrapped on 80.
> What magic I need for this?
It was unintentional. Normally, I send patches to the list as
attachments, but
I don't understand at all how you can apply this embedded-into-body
patch with all tabs replaced by spaces and lines wrapped on 80.
What magic I need for this?
Anyway, reformatted patch cleanly applying to 0.7 in the attachment.
diff --git a/config.def.h b/config.def.h
index b41747f..638c3c5 10064
I suppose this patch isn't mature enough, so you are welcome.
Content
* added -m/-M command line options to demand/ignore multiplexer
(using only -m option to toggle defaults isn't robust enough)
* config options to specify exec wrapper and finalizing commands
* sessions are named after
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:04:32 +0300
Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
Hey Ciprian,
> * Starting with the obvious `dcraw` (
> http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/ ), which although I'm sure
> will fail all of the "suckless" criteria, is among the few (if not the
> only?) open-source solution for ext
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Ben Woolley wrote:
>
> We now have very good automation tools that are not shells, like Python and
> Lua, so wouldn't it make sense to take a second look at shells that are more
> specific to command interpretation?
>
This looks fun to talk about.
I think any
Hi,
I noticed a crash in spawn(). It appears execvp() does not check whether
its first argument is NULL -- at least some implementations don't. They
happily try to dereference the NULL pointer and then segfault.
I've seen execvp() crash on Linux/glibc-2.24, FreeBSD 10.2, and NetBSD
7. "Of course"
python is not a "good automation tool".
