On 6/13/17, Cág wrote:
> So, to summarise:
>
> Browsers suck because web sucks
> C++ sucks
> Android sucks
> Python sucks
> Java sucks
> Javascript sucks
>
> In other news the sky is blue, water is wet and snow is white.
No, you suck.
> Now I reallize that I deeply lacked tact: that question was highly
> unapropriate.
You are unappropriate.
sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com:
> worst: it is an obvious troll.
>
> going to shorten it:
>
> He's right, computer systems are ultra-secure: viruses and hacks (software and
> hardware) are a very rare thing, they do not happen all the time, at best this
> is an illuminaty conspiracy to make us beli
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:56:46PM +0100, Cág wrote:
> So, to summarise:
>
> Browsers suck because web sucks
> C++ sucks
> Android sucks
> Python sucks
> Java sucks
> Javascript sucks
>
> In other news the sky is blue, water is wet and snow is white.
>
This is not obvious to many, especially if
>They both suck in their own, unique, horrible ways. Comparing them is
>like comparing turds and vomits.
It gets even worse when they are combined.
For example Android System WebView is almost 170mb of Java and C++
bloat used to run web bloat from the comfort of other bloated apps
On Linux, the performance of cat(1) can be doubled
when cat(1):ing from one pipe to another, by compiling
with -DBUFSIZ=(1<<16) (the default pipe capacity).
This is close to optimial for a read(3)/write(3)
implementation.
pgpKj3MyxJW0x.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
So, to summarise:
Browsers suck because web sucks
C++ sucks
Android sucks
Python sucks
Java sucks
Javascript sucks
In other news the sky is blue, water is wet and snow is white.
--
caóc
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:39:28PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> this is not a philosophy list, go back to school please.
worst: it is an obvious troll.
going to shorten it:
He's right, computer systems are ultra-secure: viruses and hacks (software and
hardware) are a very rare thing, they do not happen
On June 13, 2017 7:39:28 PM GMT+02:00, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> this is not a philosophy list, go back to school please.
You are right. I fooled myself into believing it was for some technical
reasons.
this is not a philosophy list, go back to school please.
On 6/13/17, Josuah Demangeon wrote:
>
>
> On June 13, 2017 7:29:14 PM GMT+02:00, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Only fools believe in computer security.
>> I'm not one of them.
>
> I am curious about the reasons as I am a total beginn
On June 13, 2017 7:29:14 PM GMT+02:00, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Only fools believe in computer security.
> I'm not one of them.
I am curious about the reasons as I am a total beginner
in that domain. Do you mind to develop about it ?
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:12:59PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > You are being unreasonable here: you are presuming that "computer security"
> > does exist... but it does not.
>
> Software does not exist either for that matter, it's j
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> You are being unreasonable here: you are presuming that "computer security"
> does exist... but it does not.
Software does not exist either for that matter, it's just a pattern of
arbitrarily encoded 0's and 1's.
"Today a young man on acid
https://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/
https://you-get.org/
Since when python3 is suckless?
To run those, you need that pile of sh*t which is python. Why not ruby? lua?
perl? js? php? haskell? squirel? etc... while we are it.
--
Sylvain
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 05:17:54PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > [...] android is doing the right thing: it separates processes by
> > running them as separate users. [...]
>
> Every respectable OS/distro packages daemons to run as separa
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:57:16AM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> Android is a moving target but this is 'suck-less' right?
Is this a joke? A basic troll attempt?
--
Sylvain
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...] android is doing the right thing: it separates processes by
> running them as separate users. [...]
Every respectable OS/distro packages daemons to run as separate users.
Every respectable piece of software separates privileges and uses
s
this is stupid. the reason i brought this up is to make clear that
android and linux don't need to be so different, you got it the wrong
way around, i.e. android is doing the right thing: it separates
processes by running them as separate users. the semantic was always
there, but it's something lin
On 13 June 2017 at 09:29, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> linux supports multiple users for permission management.
A hassle at best, quirky at worst. I'd rather have per process permissions.
> on android nothing works either. apps often require random libraries
> like google play services to be
linux supports multiple users for permission management.
on android nothing works either. apps often require random libraries
like google play services to be installed and are generally written by
comparatively incompetent programmers.
android is a moving target.
On 6/13/17, Calvin Morrison wrote
>> > For youtube, we agree 100%, but it seems that the javascript/modern web
>> > engine
>> > combo is used as a kind of DRM... namely the dependency by complexity is
>> > _on
>> > purpose_ (see the user agreement of youtube: you MUST use the
>> > javascript/modern
>> > web engine video player.
Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > When mentioning souldcloud, I usually refer to the "sound editing" feature.
>
> As a person that does most of his music making in plain old analog
> (including a tape recorder), I miss the point of having a web
> However not without labor on the part of the developer.
check the script i posted on this mailing list before that doesn't
require any labor on part of the developer since i posted it.
On 6/13/17, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> When mention
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> When mentioning souldcloud, I usually refer to the "sound editing" feature.
As a person that does most of his music making in plain old analog
(including a tape recorder), I miss the point of having a web service
doing audio stuff, i.e. what
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:06:38PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Ofc, some internet sites do provide services which are hard dependent
> > on a rich GUI (I usually mention soundcloud).
>
> Actually audio and video playback these days c
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ofc, some internet sites do provide services which are hard dependent
> on a rich GUI (I usually mention soundcloud).
Actually audio and video playback these days can be done with pure HTML
markup, which is sufficient for a completely bare-b
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 02:19:08PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Coming back to the real practical world: until then I try to keep my
> (personal)
> HTML pages simple[5] and use as little Javascript as possible (no jQuery!).
A noscript web portal should be mandatory for the web sites which the
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 01:30:12PM -0700, Louis Santillan wrote:
> base, I disagree with the choice of nodejs & Qt), could make web
> browsing . . . better, safer, more performant.
c++ only based components: it's not suckless then, by definition.
It's already game over before it even starts.
--
i will so install you guy's facebook app
29 matches
Mail list logo
