On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 07:37:56PM +, fao_ wrote:
> > 9base is not intended for interactive use, so no, p does not really
> > belong into 9base. 9base is intended to be a scripting environment.
>
> Excuse me if this is a stupid question, but: What's the difference?
Interactive: things that use
When compiling 9base with
CC=musl-gcc
PREFIX=""
OBJTYPE=x86_64
I get the error:
../lib9/lib9.a(notify.o): In function `signotify`:
notify.c:(.text+0x9a): undefined reference to `sigsetjmp`
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Except:
$ grep -Rni "sigsetjmp" /usr/lib/musl/
/us
On 2017-08-24 1:50 pm, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
On 24 August 2017 at 13:33, Greg Reagle wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017, at 05:01, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
On 24 August 2017 at 01:59, fao_ wrote:
> Is the suckless project packing a replacement to my favorite pager,
> less(1)? Or is the advice to just u
Hi Laslo,
Thanks for the clarification. I have to say it's definitely a different
experience getting used to suckless code.
Dan
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017, at 06:13 AM, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 20:28:12 -0500
> Daniel Xu wrote:
>
> Hey Daniel,
>
> > I'm currently familiarizing mys
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:12:12AM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> - (optional) repo owners/maintainers should sign their future git tags
> for release creation by using their own private PGP key.
Optionally, for those who don't want to use OpenPGP, the author of libsodium
created Minisign back in
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:48:13 +0200
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Hi Mattias,
>
> On 25 August 2017 at 16:32, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:54:41 +0200
> > Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> >
> >> On 25 August 2017 at 12:56, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 08:12:12 +0200
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:54:41 +0200
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 25 August 2017 at 12:56, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 08:12:12 +0200
> > Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> >> - (optional) repo owners/maintainers should sign their future git tags
> >> for release creation by using their own
On 25 August 2017 at 12:56, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 08:12:12 +0200
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> - (optional) repo owners/maintainers should sign their future git tags
>> for release creation by using their own private PGP key.
>
> the public PGP-keys could be put on the
> http://
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 08:12:12 +0200
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Dear Anselm,
> - (optional) repo owners/maintainers should sign their future git tags
> for release creation by using their own private PGP key.
the public PGP-keys could be put on the
http://suckless.org/people/*-pages.
--
Laslo Hunhol
Quoth Joshua Haase:
> It's not so many work if git is configured to always sign and/or the
> package build system sign by default.
Configuring git to sign every commit is a pain if you have a
passphrase on your gpg key, or it's tied to a smartcard; entering
that every time you commit makes the
10 matches
Mail list logo