Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> [...] and I hate busybox!
Why?
Actually, if a Linux kernel can be compiled without GNU bc, it's a
step forward. Next would be getting rid of gcc-isms, and, finally,
making a new build system.
--
caóc
On 2018-03-13, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:44:08 -0600
> Gavin Howard wrote:
>> About GNU extensions: this was originally implemented for toybox
>> (http://landley.net/toybox/), and the maintainer specifically asked
>> that my bc be able to run
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/
I submitted my bc because someone thought I should. I am sorry for
taking your time.
GH
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:44:08 -0600
> Gavin Howard wrote:
>
> Dear Gavin,
>
>> I am not so good with Makefiles, so I can see your point on that.
>
> it's
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:44:08 -0600
Gavin Howard wrote:
Dear Gavin,
> I am not so good with Makefiles, so I can see your point on that.
it's not too drastic, but it makes sense to investigate that a bit.
> As far as dc, technically dc is not a standard, so if you
> standards-conformant behavior
Laslo,
I am not so good with Makefiles, so I can see your point on that.
As far as dc, technically dc is not a standard, so if you
standards-conformant behavior, you need to write a bc that can operate
without dc. However, I will also be implementing dc in the same repo
someday. The question is w
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:30:40 -0600
Gavin Howard wrote:
Hey Gavin,
> I was told that I should submit submit a link to my bc on this mailing
> list. It's in alpha stage.
based on the first look, it looks good. However, there are multiple
things I have an issue with:
- GNU extensions: This is a
Hello,
I was told that I should submit submit a link to my bc on this mailing
list. It's in alpha stage.
https://github.com/gavinhoward/bc
Gavin Howard
Hi
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:52 AM, hp.g wrote:
> Not sure, whether this observed behavior is intended or whether it is a bug;
> anyway it irritates (at least) me greatly, because I would expect:
> - if the focus is on master and I close that master then
> - the new master should have the focus i
situation:
I have 3 windows open (1 on the left as master, 2 on the right, vertically
arranged as stacked window)
like so:
-
|A |B |
|
||C |
-
I then do the following:
1. I focus C, then A (without windows rearrangement)
2. I close A
--> then B will get mast
