On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 08:27:48PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> https://releases.linaro.org/archive/13.05/components/toolchain/gcc-linaro/4.7/
It was based on 4.7.3 and included the arm64/aarch64 branch. There is gcc 4.7.4
and it seems the aarch64 branch is more recent.
--
Sylvain
wt., 21 maj 2019 o 20:12 napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 09:27:19AM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> > wt., 21 maj 2019 o 08:14 Michael Forney napisał(a):
> > >
> > > On 2019-05-20, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > Sadly, gcc-4.7 does not have an aarch64 backend and it's a
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 09:27:19AM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> wt., 21 maj 2019 o 08:14 Michael Forney napisał(a):
> >
> > On 2019-05-20, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > > Sadly, gcc-4.7 does not have an aarch64 backend and it's a pain to
> > > configure
> > > without breaking anyt
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:12:04PM -0700, Michael Forney wrote:
> Yes, I tested building gcc-9.1 with gcc-4.7.4 built by my compiler. I
> have not tried gcc-8.
It's very good news (actually less worse news than usual from the gcc world).
> At least gcc tracks the autotools-generated files in the
wt., 21 maj 2019 o 08:14 Michael Forney napisał(a):
>
> On 2019-05-20, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Sadly, gcc-4.7 does not have an aarch64 backend and it's a pain to
> > configure
> > without breaking anything.
>
> I wonder what the state of ARM/aarch64-4.7-branch is:
> https://gcc.gnu.
