On 2020-01-17, Quentin Rameau wrote:
>> Perhaps we should bring this up on the austin group list and get them
>> to clarify the text.
>
> Done, let's wait and see.
Thanks, Quentin!
For anyone following, the clarification request is at
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1319
> Perhaps we should bring this up on the austin group list and get them
> to clarify the text.
Done, let's wait and see.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:17 AM Michael Forney wrote:
>
> All the other implementations I looked at *do* insert the contents of the
> file.
I think that's the important point. We should also check how other
commands that "start the next cycle" behave in relation to r. E.g. I
could see the same p
> Hello,
Hi Michael,
> I recently ran into a package (dialog), which uses the following sed
> script to generate its dlg_config.h header:
>
> /@DEFS@/r conftest.frag
> /@DEFS@/d
>
> The intention is to replace @DEFS@ in the header template with the
> contents of a file. However, sbase sed skips
Hello,
I recently ran into a package (dialog), which uses the following sed
script to generate its dlg_config.h header:
/@DEFS@/r conftest.frag
/@DEFS@/d
The intention is to replace @DEFS@ in the header template with the
contents of a file. However, sbase sed skips writing the contents of
the fi
