On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 02:28:27 -0800
climbTheStairs wrote:
Dear climbTheStairs,
> I have used quark to host my static website for the past few months,
> and I've been amazed by how well it works.
> I want to try out the idea of keeping data processing
> and data presentation separate, described on
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:37:37 +0100
Teodoro Santoni wrote:
Dear Teodoro,
> A reverse proxy is vital only if your server can serve only HTTP(S)
> and little else. Otherwise it just prevents urls from looking ugly:
> you can serve your other process for input process on another port and
> put http:/
Hi
2022-02-09 11:28 GMT+01:00, climbTheStairs :
> Hello,
>
> I have used quark to host my static website for the past few months,
> and I've been amazed by how well it works.
> I want to try out the idea of keeping data processing
> and data presentation separate, described on quark's webpage:
>
>
Hello,
I have used quark to host my static website for the past few months,
and I've been amazed by how well it works.
I want to try out the idea of keeping data processing
and data presentation separate, described on quark's webpage:
> The solution is to rely on static regeneration independent
>
