Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-04-09 Thread Łukasz Pankowski
Bjartur Thorlacius writes: > On 4/6/11, Hank D wrote: >> The problem is that mutt sucks, too. >> > True. It can be configured to suck even less, though. But I want a > minimalist alternative that's configured to suck less *at build time*. > >> If the default for a text-based MUA is not to just d

Re: [dev] onscreen keyboards (xvkbd), dwm, and dmenu (part II with a patch to dwm)

2011-02-02 Thread Łukasz Pankowski
Peter John Hartman writes: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:48:26AM +0100, Łukasz Pankowski wrote: >> Patch command refused to apply it with "Only garbage was found in the >> patch input." but with -n option (The patch is in normal diff format) >> the config.h part

Re: [dev] onscreen keyboards (xvkbd), dwm, and dmenu (part II with a patch to dwm)

2011-02-01 Thread Łukasz Pankowski
Peter John Hartman writes: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:36:30AM +0100, Łukasz Pankowski wrote: >> based hack but I went on with gestures patch found on dwm wiki. I use >> "l"/"r" gestures on a window title for focusing prev/next client and > > I tried tha

Re: [dev] onscreen keyboards (xvkbd), dwm, and dmenu (part II with a patch to dwm)

2011-02-01 Thread Łukasz Pankowski
Peter John Hartman writes: >> Another issue is to shrink the client area available to the managed >> clients so that the keyboard does not cover the clients. Instead of shrinking the client idea I added a key to my svkbd to switch between bottom/top placement of svkbd (bottom by default) [patch

Re: [dev] onscreen keyboards (xvkbd), dwm, and dmenu (part II with a patch to dwm)

2011-01-29 Thread Łukasz Pankowski
Peter John Hartman writes: > Hi folks, > > A few things: > > 1. Below is a very simple patch to dwm to make it play nice with onscreen > keyboards. It could be improved, and especially I want to implement > this: > > * If the osk (on screen keyboard, e.g., xvkbd) has the focus but it is > focus