On Jul 17, 2013 7:39 PM, "Calvin Morrison" wrote:
>
> What was the last time you used the reverse polish notation calculator
> that precedes the invention of C?
It is the calculator I always use.
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Jul 16, 2013 9:58 AM, "Nick" wrote:
>
> Going back to the workflow question, then, who here always checks
> the list of all files in an archive to check that there's nothing
> with a suspicious path?
I always check to see whether content is going to be placed into separate
directory.
Dmi
On Jul 6, 2013 5:04 PM, "Andrew Hills" wrote:
>
> So, for compatibility, perhaps it is best to allow both.
You mean the whole lot of GNU tar long options including filename rewriting
and masks? I don't see any way such implementation could fit "suckless"
principles.
I would suggest a subset of P
Apparently is there anybody who uses dashes in tar's keys?
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Jul 6, 2013 12:16 PM, "Galos, David" wrote:
>
> In short, how do you fine folks invoke your tar?
$ tar czf filename.tar.gz foldername
$ tar tzf filename.tar.gz
$ tar xzf filename.tar.gz
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
OFF TOPIC
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:33 AM, David wrote:
> If you have e.g. python, I'd use wx and if I really need advanced
> controls and a highly dynamic GUI, Qt.
I once wrote a rather small utility in python using Tkinter. My
co-workers wanted to use it, but they had Windows, and I wanted to
Tk?
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Jun 11, 2013 5:30 PM, "hiro" <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just because I do indeed have empathy with this stupid planet's
> population I'd rather have people stop writing software commonly made
> for other people or for another greater good. Nobody needs software to
> fuck up their lives that muc
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> I thought nmh's inc command would be able to convert maildir into the
> nmh format and save it to a mail directory of your choosing for use
> with nmh. If that's not the case I will have to rethink my approach.
I'm not sure whether inc indeed
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Nick wrote:
> I use mbsync in several places and it works very well, and is a good
> deal simpler and more reasonable than offlineimap or isync.
>From what I gather isync is a wrapper around mbsync, which is only
used to provide configuration file stability.
--
D
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> I think I may try to use it with nmh/mmh next and see whether that
> combination is even better.
Isync only supports Maildir for local storage, while nmh uses mh
format, so they are incompatible.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Jun 11, 2013 3:20 PM, "Alex Pilon" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:35:33PM +0300, Edgaras wrote:
> > Well mutt is niceish, but not suckless. (well at something like 20MB
> > of ram
>
> In what state? Stripped, idle and no configuration (~5mb
> shared+resident)? With a connection (let's ad
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Markus Teich
wrote:
> * When symlinking files i get problems when moving/backing up the
> configfiles in $HOME since it will move the symlink and maybe write an
> actual file to $HOME instead.
Hardlinks?
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Lynx, while not being optimal, seems to decide to rather break the
> layout than do that. When I read “the web” it’s mostly information
> (as in: text) consumption, and for that, the layout is secondary.
This was the main reason behind my
On May 28, 2013 1:07 PM, "markus schnalke" wrote:
>
> Is there really someone (apart from mirabilos) who uses lynx?
I use lynx as my primary browser (and surf when lynx fails).
> Don't you rather use w3m?
w3m has some graphical capabilities, which makes it combine drawbacks of
both console and
On May 27, 2013 11:53 PM, "Hadrian Węgrzynowski" wrote:
>
> For example support only two fonts: monospace and proportional.
And have some sites broken because the idiots who made them did some
pixel-exact fine tuning based on some particular font's properties. I still
hit the occasions when the r
On May 27, 2013 11:13 PM, "Nick" wrote:
>
> Netsurf's rendering libraries are pretty suckless. But they don't
> have at all complete javascript / dom support yet, so it's only as
> useful as lynx (which is to say, rather useful, but not for
> everything that is convenient to do on the web).
NetSu
On May 27, 2013 8:25 PM, "Christoph Lohmann" <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> Surf is waiting for someone to write a suckless rendering engine. Then
> the HTTP transfer functions can be done through some filesystem.
I wouldn't bet on seeing suckless rendering engine anytime soon. Actually,
the amount
On May 27, 2013 12:12 PM, "Fernando C.V." wrote:
>
> Normally this means (for videos at least), the link is actually a html
> page with a flash plugin or a tag. Either that or you will
> need a video player that speaks http.
There can be a gentler solution similar to the way some network protoco
On May 27, 2013 12:23 PM, "Truls Becken" wrote:
>
> On 2013-05-27, at 12:12, Fernando C.V. wrote:
>
> Which they usually do. It's called streaming and has been popular for
roughly 15 years.
Ambiguous jargon: RTP, plain HTTP and flash are all called streaming in
different contexts.
Dmitrij D
On May 26, 2013 3:08 PM, "Random832" wrote:
> Why is the requirement that it conform to your IPC protocol* less onerous
than requiring it to conform to a particular in-process API that would make
it a "plug-in"?
May it owe to the fact that this particular IPC protocol is *the* protocol
used for n
On May 24, 2013 4:11 PM, "Christian Neukirchen"
wrote:
> > Types can't be declared properly in Gopher.
>
> Types can't be declared properly in Unix.
There is mime, which can be combined with mailcap in a useful way.
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On May 24, 2013 2:36 PM, "Nick" wrote:
> It's the web designers who are primarily responsible
> for ruining things. And those who pay them.
I sincerely believe that any technology lying between non-technical
consumers and goods/services providers is deemed to get abused all the
possi
On May 24, 2013 11:44 AM, "Nick" wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:04:16AM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> > Sanitized HTTP could do. 9p and gopher could do as well.
>
> No, gopher sucks a lot. Seriously. Look at how its menu / index
> system works. It's
On May 24, 2013 11:58 AM, "Prakhar Goel" wrote:
>
> Anybody take a look at the /browser idea?
>
> Site:http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/10/get-browser-exe/
To me it sounds like "let's make the web so unusable that people will have
to abandon it".
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Sam Watkins wrote:
> What do you suggest is better than HTML? troff? TeX? docbook? markdown?
Better for what? IMO a well-designed cross-platform networked RPC
coupled with TCL/Tk could render most of JS and some of CSS3 useless,
so that the brain-damaged conce
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Sam Watkins wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:25:04AM +0200, Jens Nyberg wrote:
>> I have never tried rio but if I were to design one today I would have a
>> simple synthetic filesystem that for each window multiplexes the
>> framebuffer which is basically how ri
27 matches
Mail list logo
