Hi Greg,
On 2024-03-09 15:34, Greg Reagle wrote:
I have an epub ebook. It is a novel, but when I get this process working, I
want to repeat it for any epub ebook.
I want to read it, with formatting (such as underline or italics), with less.
I am happy to use any software that exists in the
Hello Spenser,
You could just install e.g. runit and use it to run quark.
With Debian it would be the 'runit-run' package.
Best Regards,
Georg
On 5/30/23 04:37, Spenser Truex wrote:
My $10/yr VPS host Racknerd ungraciously requires that I'd make a support
ticket in order to get a custom IS
Hi LM,
Monitoring always sucks 8-]
I settled on collectd[1], which ".. has been reported as working on .. AIX".
To "unsuck" it a little bit, I compile from sources and leave out every
plugin I do not need. My sample "./configure" is below, you might want
to leave out even more (chrony, sensor
Hi,
The topic of header dependency tracking is already addressed since the
inception of redo by DJB.
The Appenwarr documentation offers a fairly simple answer in the form of
an "implicit" .do file for object files.
---
cat > default.o.do <2. build the object file and generate a make-style
Hello,
Does nobuf(1) help?
http://jdebp.uk/Softwares/djbwares/guide/nobuf.html
Note: it tackles exactly the POSIX feature to line buffer output to
tty's by providing one to the program in the pipeline, but without using
any shared-object magic.
Have not used it (yet) though.
Best Regards
Just a heads up,
I tampered around with redo-c. Find it at
https://github.com/jorge-leon/redo-c
It:
- Captures stdout of do files in the target file.
- Does not create an empty target if $3 is empty. This allows for
"phony" targets and protects against silly mistakes.
- Truncates targets
Hi Sergey,
You might have overlooked, that jdebp not only did a documentation of
redo, but also provides a C++ implementation:
http://jdebp.eu/Softwares/redo/
Best Regards,
Georg
On 12/17/20 7:44 PM, Sergey Matveev wrote:
Greetings!
I see that redo subject was already there before:
ht
On 4/5/20 2:58 PM, Greg Reagle wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020, at 06:57, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:11:09 +0200
Georg Lehner wrote:
A question: why is the scrollback-patch not included in `st` already
exactly my point. I see no reason why there can't at least be a
scrol
On 4/3/20 9:17 AM, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 21:14:11 +0200
Georg Lehner wrote:
Dear Georg,
...
at this point, why not just use the scrollback-patch?
With best regards
Laslo
Finally I felt nudged to test the scrollback patches. Nice work!
Two of the patches failed - the
I just figured out, that `st` already has an unlimited scrollback buffer
- kind of.
Run `st -o /tmp/unlimited_scrollbackbuffer`.
Than inside the `st` terminal, you can `less`, `vi` ... whatever you want.
For a starter try: `less -r +G /tmp/unlimited_scrollbackbuffer`
Of course it makes sense
10 matches
Mail list logo
